Agent X
Jan 30th, '04, 05:21 PM
Lord Liaden asked you a question about adjacent hexes and the answer wasn't clear enough for my meager intellect.
You said, "1. No. Adjacent is adjacent — right next to the hex the character is standing in when he begins or launches the attack."
Here's the deal. For a move through, the first sentence in it's description describes that attack as a full move up to the target and then an attack: "Move Through allows a character to attack at the end of a Full Move by running right into his opponent."
So, in a move through, not stretching or the like, is the hex adjacent to you when you attack at the end of a full move considered adjacent? I really can't understand the rationale for a hand to hand attack against a person in the hex right beside you to be anything but an adjacent hex which means a area affect attack would be attacking DCV 0.
This came up concerning Viperia's affect a hex strength.
You said, "1. No. Adjacent is adjacent — right next to the hex the character is standing in when he begins or launches the attack."
Here's the deal. For a move through, the first sentence in it's description describes that attack as a full move up to the target and then an attack: "Move Through allows a character to attack at the end of a Full Move by running right into his opponent."
So, in a move through, not stretching or the like, is the hex adjacent to you when you attack at the end of a full move considered adjacent? I really can't understand the rationale for a hand to hand attack against a person in the hex right beside you to be anything but an adjacent hex which means a area affect attack would be attacking DCV 0.
This came up concerning Viperia's affect a hex strength.