Silbeg
Mar 19th, '05, 10:06 PM
On 5E 311, it refers to the tripling of cost for automaton defenses (with the Takes No Stun power) but this happens right after the sentance detailing the reducing to 1/3 for the base defenses.
HD also assumes that this reduction (increase) takes place on all defenses (Mental DEF, Force Wall, Flash DEF, Lack of Weakness, Power DEF)... which I am not so sure is implied in this rule.
Granted, there may need to be discussion with Steve Long on this, but I don't see why it should cost 3X for a automaton's Flash DEF.
Thanks!
HD also assumes that this reduction (increase) takes place on all defenses (Mental DEF, Force Wall, Flash DEF, Lack of Weakness, Power DEF)... which I am not so sure is implied in this rule.
Granted, there may need to be discussion with Steve Long on this, but I don't see why it should cost 3X for a automaton's Flash DEF.
Thanks!