PDA

View Full Version : .50 Calibur Revolver


Super Squirrel
Feb 14th, '03, 05:06 PM
I read in the paper today that a new 5 shot revolver is on the market now for $980. It is different, because it is the first firearm to feature a .50 Calibur round. I'd quote the article if I hadn't misplaced it but it is said to have the stopping power to take down a charging bear. Any idea what the write up for that would be?

My initial guess would be 2d6 RKA, Double Knockback, Charges 5, Real Weapon.

Aroooo
Feb 14th, '03, 05:14 PM
Originally posted by Super Squirrel
I read in the paper today that a new 5 shot revolver is on the market now for $980. It is different, because it is the first firearm to feature a .50 Calibur round. I'd quote the article if I hadn't misplaced it but it is said to have the stopping power to take down a charging bear. Any idea what the write up for that would be?

I don't follow the gun world to closely, but there ave been .50 cal revolvers before. My uninformed guess would be this is a new production gun, rather than a custom job.

Originally posted by Super Squirrel
My initial guess would be 2d6 RKA, Double Knockback, Charges 5, Real Weapon.

I would think a high STR min too, possibly even the 1 1/2 hands limitation (probably two hands to compensate for the monster recoil).

Aroooo

Gary
Feb 14th, '03, 05:32 PM
Originally posted by Super Squirrel
I read in the paper today that a new 5 shot revolver is on the market now for $980. It is different, because it is the first firearm to feature a .50 Calibur round. I'd quote the article if I hadn't misplaced it but it is said to have the stopping power to take down a charging bear. Any idea what the write up for that would be?

My initial guess would be 2d6 RKA, Double Knockback, Charges 5, Real Weapon.

I wouldn't give it double knockback. The machine gun version which is much more powerful doesn't have it. A +1 stun multiple would work though.

AlHazred
Feb 14th, '03, 05:35 PM
Bah, there've been .50 caliber handguns before; the .50 Desert Eagle springs to mind. This is all marketing. I mean, who really thinks a slightly bigger gun is a "new order of threat to law enforcement"? Where'd they find this guy? Has he ever heard of this Bin Laden guy and the nukes he's trying to buy? How's that for a "new order of threat"?

Anyway, it's probably a 2d6+1 RKA, +1 STUN, 5 Charges. For superhero-level games, I might be convinced to go to 2 1/2d6, but that's as far as I go.

Super Squirrel
Feb 14th, '03, 06:27 PM
:rolleyes: You can see how much I follow the gun world. The most I know about it comes from watching the History channel. I suppose there are .50 caliburs out there. This one is designed to be one handed. I'd imagine the wrist would hurt afterwards but it is definitely one handed.

Fitz
Feb 14th, '03, 06:35 PM
Back in the days of the Raj in India there was a relatively common large-bore pistol in use generally called a "howdah pistol". The intended function of the weapon was twofold: first, to blow out the brains of your elephant if it ran wild, and second, to blow out the brains of a tiger if it jumped up on to your elephant. It was a double-barrelled break action (like a shotgun) and loaded .577 Express elephant gun rounds.

At first, the same rounds as those used in the rifle were used, but it was soon found that their recoil was far too great for a handgun, and cut-down versions of the cartridge were produced specifically for the pistols.

Old Man
Feb 14th, '03, 07:25 PM
I think the distinction with the new S&W .50 is that it's a .50 magnum. I don't see how a normal human could fire one without snapping their wrist, but whatever.

The same article mentioned that they're also producing an alloy .44 magnum revolver that weighs 1.5 pounds. See my wrist snapping comment above.

Edsel
Feb 14th, '03, 08:08 PM
Originally posted by Old Man
I think the distinction with the new S&W .50 is that it's a .50 magnum. I don't see how a normal human could fire one without snapping their wrist, but whatever.

The same article mentioned that they're also producing an alloy .44 magnum revolver that weighs 1.5 pounds. See my wrist snapping comment above.

I have a Colt Anaconda .44 magnum revolver and I can control it one-handed with +P ammo. I don't really consider myself to be of more than average strength so I think a .50 .magnum would be controllable with a two-handed stance.

AlHazred
Feb 14th, '03, 08:18 PM
There's an article on the 500 S&W Magnum round here (http://www.sskindustries.com/500S&W.html). The guy doesn't seem to have had that much trouble, and doesn't look to be above a 13 or 14 STR. You could set the STR Min there with no argument from me.

cboscari
Feb 15th, '03, 05:44 PM
I am not a gun guy, which is why I bought Guns! Guns! Guns! from BTRC. With this amazing book, you can figure out how real guns would rate in several game systems, including HERO. You can also build guns don't really exist (like laser) and figure those out too, but from what I understand, there is a lot more at issue than caliber, such as muzzle length, and other factors. MAybe someone with a copy of GGG can give us an answer...
Chris

Agent X
Feb 15th, '03, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by AlHazred
There's an article on the 500 S&W Magnum round here (http://www.sskindustries.com/500S&W.html). The guy doesn't seem to have had that much trouble, and doesn't look to be above a 13 or 14 STR. You could set the STR Min there with no argument from me.

Dude! You are mighty when you can measure actual people's strength in Hero stats from memory. Just for the sake of balance, close FRED and move away from the book for say, 5 minutes. Everybody needs a break once in a while.:D

Toadmaster
Feb 15th, '03, 08:16 PM
Ok, first of all I find many see .50 cal and start thinking of the M2HB .50 machinegun. If you look at the picture at the bottom of the page of the link you will see that the bullet alone from the machinegun is larger than the entire .500 S&W cartridge.

The .500 S&W is listed as a 325 grain bullet at 2000fps, this computes as 2886 Ft/lbs of muzzle energy. This compares to the power of a .30-06 rifle or several of the large magnum handguns like the .454 Casull. It is much more powerful than the .44 magnum which has about 1200 ft/lbs of energy. The .50 cal M2HB machinegun on the other hand has in the neighborhood of 13,000 ft/lbs.

Off the top of my head I'd say 2d6+1 with a +2 stun mod sounds about right (a 325 grain bullet is heavy, almost 50% heavier than the bullet of the .44 magnum) Strmin 14 or 15 seems fair, there currently is no method more scientific than taking a SWAG at this time. It is probably a very heavy revolver so could be fired one handed but I wouldn't try it, 1 1/2 handed does not seem unreasonable.

As to other .50's
The Desert Eagle .50AE is probably the most available since it is regular production. Not a .50 but the .454 Casull revolver is in the same power range and is also a production weapon.

The rest are semi-custom and would be more difficult to get.
.500 Linebaugh and .475 Linebaugh (the .475 is actually the more powerful of the two)
Century's "The mother load" in .50-70 is probably the most powerful of the .50's (about 3000 ft/lbs) although I heard they were working on an even larger revolver in .50-110. The .50-70 version has a 10" barrel and weighs 6 lbs, I've seen a picture of this revolver being fired and lets just say it look odd and completely out of proportion to the shooter.

Thanks for the link, I hadn't heard of the .500 S&W yet, seems like there is a new cartridge coming out each month lately.

Monolith
Feb 15th, '03, 08:22 PM
Nightwind uses a .50 Desert Eagle. There is a nice write-up for it in the Millennium City supplement. I'd post the stats here but I think that might violate the confidentiality agreement. It will be out soon though. ;)

cboscari
Feb 15th, '03, 08:28 PM
Toadmaster-

As I mentioned, don't know much about guns except for what I read in Guns, Guns Guns! but with the stats you gave, they gave 2d6+1 killing damage as well. I'm glad we have that settled ;)
Chris

BasilDrag
Feb 15th, '03, 08:46 PM
Originally posted by Toadmaster
Ok, first of all I find many see .50 cal and start thinking of the M2HB .50 machinegun. If you look at the picture at the bottom of the page of the link you will see that the bullet alone from the machinegun is larger than the entire .500 S&W cartridge.

The .500 S&W is listed as a 325 grain bullet at 2000fps, this computes as 2886 Ft/lbs of muzzle energy. This compares to the power of a .30-06 rifle or several of the large magnum handguns like the .454 Casull. It is much more powerful than the .44 magnum which has about 1200 ft/lbs of energy. The .50 cal M2HB machinegun on the other hand has in the neighborhood of 13,000 ft/lbs.

Off the top of my head I'd say 2d6+1 with a +2 stun mod sounds about right (a 325 grain bullet is heavy, almost 50% heavier than the bullet of the .44 magnum) Strmin 14 or 15 seems fair, there currently is no method more scientific than taking a SWAG at this time. It is probably a very heavy revolver so could be fired one handed but I wouldn't try it, 1 1/2 handed does not seem unreasonable.

As to other .50's
The Desert Eagle .50AE is probably the most available since it is regular production. Not a .50 but the .454 Casull revolver is in the same power range and is also a production weapon.

The rest are semi-custom and would be more difficult to get.
.500 Linebaugh and .475 Linebaugh (the .475 is actually the more powerful of the two)
Century's "The mother load" in .50-70 is probably the most powerful of the .50's (about 3000 ft/lbs) although I heard they were working on an even larger revolver in .50-110. The .50-70 version has a 10" barrel and weighs 6 lbs, I've seen a picture of this revolver being fired and lets just say it look odd and completely out of proportion to the shooter.

Thanks for the link, I hadn't heard of the .500 S&W yet, seems like there is a new cartridge coming out each month lately.

{This is also in response to cboscari}

I've got "Guns! Guns! Guns!" 3rd edition (aka 3G3), and the companion book "More Guns!" because I'm not that much of a gun person either. ;)

Using the sited webpage, and those books, it looks like the 500 S&W is in the .50AE/.454 Casull range.

BTW, what's shown on the webpage is not a revolver, but a single-shot bolt-action handgun. Most really, really powerful handguns are single-shot bolt-actions.

Someone pointed out a written-up character with .5oAE's; I'd use them for the 500 S&W. It doesn't look like there'd be enough difference to matter, in game-rules terms.

Tom
Feb 16th, '03, 04:46 PM
Originally posted by BasilDrag

<...snip...>

BTW, what's shown on the webpage is not a revolver, but a single-shot bolt-action handgun. Most really, really powerful handguns are single-shot bolt-actions.

<...snip...>

I hate to be too picky, but I am... ;) :p :rolleyes:

The weapon pictured is a break-action handgun. A modified TC Encore.

BasilDrag
Feb 16th, '03, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by Tom
I hate to be too picky, but I am... ;) :p :rolleyes:

The weapon pictured is a break-action handgun. A modified TC Encore.

Having double checked the site, I must stand (1) corrected. :/



(1) Stand in the corner, that is.

gewing
Feb 16th, '03, 11:39 PM
I have to disagree. The .50 AE has about 1300 footlounds of energy witha 325 grain bullet at 1300 fps.

The .500 s&W has 2500 footlbs with a 440gr (one 0unce) bullet at 1625 fps. THis is far more difference than between the .44 magnum and the .50 AE.


Originally posted by BasilDrag
{This is also in response to cboscari}

I've got "Guns! Guns! Guns!" 3rd edition (aka 3G3), and the companion book "More Guns!" because I'm not that much of a gun person either. ;)

Using the sited webpage, and those books, it looks like the 500 S&W is in the .50AE/.454 Casull range.

BTW, what's shown on the webpage is not a revolver, but a single-shot bolt-action handgun. Most really, really powerful handguns are single-shot bolt-actions.

Someone pointed out a written-up character with .5oAE's; I'd use them for the 500 S&W. It doesn't look like there'd be enough difference to matter, in game-rules terms.

Dr. Anomaly
Feb 17th, '03, 02:35 AM
Now, this is strictly from memory, so please feel free to point out where (if?) I'm wrong, but I thought the British had a .50 cal revolver used by naval officers during the latter years of the 19th century / first years of the 20th.

(As it's currently 4:34 a.m. here and I haven't been to bed yet, I'm not gonna go and try and dig out the references right now. Besides, that shelf of the bookcase where those are stored is currently blocked by a mound of Transformers.)

gewing
Feb 17th, '03, 04:46 AM
I think you are right, but if it was like the .50 US one, it was a 350-300 grain bullet at 600 fps.

A whole different world in terms of power. Now some of the HOWDAH guns...



Originally posted by Dr. Anomaly
Now, this is strictly from memory, so please feel free to point out where (if?) I'm wrong, but I thought the British had a .50 cal revolver used by naval officers during the latter years of the 19th century / first years of the 20th.

(As it's currently 4:34 a.m. here and I haven't been to bed yet, I'm not gonna go and try and dig out the references right now. Besides, that shelf of the bookcase where those are stored is currently blocked by a mound of Transformers.)

Toadmaster
Feb 17th, '03, 03:12 PM
The SSK site showed 325 gr bullet at 2000 fps, which works out as 2886 ft/lbs, the S&W site shows 2600 ft/lbs but considering the loss of 1.5" of barrel compared to the T/C pistol that would explain the loss in energy. Either way it is far more powerful than the .44 Mag which has about 1200 ft/lbs or the .50 AE at around 1400 ft/lbs.

Gewing do you have any other sources for this cartridge, so far I have seen the SSK site with a 325 Grain bullet and CorBon with 275, 400 and 440 grain bullets.

BTW here is a link to the S&W site with a shot of the revolver for anyone interested.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/products/firearms/m500.htm

gewing
Feb 17th, '03, 07:02 PM
You could try the shooters.com discussion boards. Otherwise you have about all the info I have.

I'm looking for more on the 6.8mm SOCOM round, supposedly a120 grain 6.5 bullet at 2700 out of an M-16. I have heard it is based on a .30 remington with a rebated rim, uses same magazines, etc.

I want one as a light hunting rifle. :)

Originally posted by Toadmaster
The SSK site showed 325 gr bullet at 2000 fps, which works out as 2886 ft/lbs, the S&W site shows 2600 ft/lbs but considering the loss of 1.5" of barrel compared to the T/C pistol that would explain the loss in energy. Either way it is far more powerful than the .44 Mag which has about 1200 ft/lbs or the .50 AE at around 1400 ft/lbs.

Gewing do you have any other sources for this cartridge, so far I have seen the SSK site with a 325 Grain bullet and CorBon with 275, 400 and 440 grain bullets.

BTW here is a link to the S&W site with a shot of the revolver for anyone interested.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/products/firearms/m500.htm

Law Dog
Feb 17th, '03, 08:39 PM
Of course, the real meat of this subject is why are we quibbling over such minutae in a mainly superhero rpg. The size of the gun tends to pale severly in comparison with the guy shooting the electron stripping ray out of his nostrils.

I had one of my more urban heroes packing a .68 cal magnum, not because such a gun in the real world would take down anything the roams the planet, but because it sounded really big. I mean, it sounded really cool when Eastwood said it with a .44 magnum, can you imagine it updated for this weapon?

"This is a .68 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world. It can blow your head clean off and then still drop the elephant standing behind you and your grandma . . ."

It's all fun. :D

Toadmaster
Feb 17th, '03, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by Law Dog
Of course, the real meat of this subject is why are we quibbling over such minutae in a mainly superhero rpg. The size of the gun tends to pale severly in comparison with the guy shooting the electron stripping ray out of his nostrils.

I had one of my more urban heroes packing a .68 cal magnum, not because such a gun in the real world would take down anything the roams the planet, but because it sounded really big. I mean, it sounded really cool when Eastwood said it with a .44 magnum, can you imagine it updated for this weapon?

"This is a .68 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world. It can blow your head clean off and then still drop the elephant standing behind you and your grandma . . ."

It's all fun. :D

Probably because HERO is not primarily a superhero game anymore. Sure Champions claims the lions share of fans but I don't use it for supers at all, I primarily play post-apacalyse, modern, fantasy and sci-fi. Yes you can do "Gun, 1 ea", but some of us like a little more detail and despite comments to the contrary HERO does just fine with a fairly fine amount of detail. Besides I think some of us just like an excuse to talk about guns.

Gewing I haven't seen any info on the 6.8mm SOCOM if I do, I'll let you know.

Old Man
Feb 17th, '03, 09:38 PM
I've heard secondhand of a "hobbyist" out here who constructed a single-shot bolt-action .50 BMG pistol from scratch. From what I understand it performed reasonably well, although the muzzle flash was about as lethal as the round itself.

The story goes that the BATF came down and asked him a couple of pointed questions, e.g. "That's the last gun you're going to build in that caliber, ever. Right?"

I have no idea where he gets the ammo.

SuperPheemy
Feb 18th, '03, 12:52 PM
The Model 500 weighs in at 4.5 pounds, and incorporates a number of recoil-reducing and shock-absorbing properties thoughout the weapon. I'm pretty sure it could be fired accurately one handed, and so long as you have a firm grip, won't break your arm.

However, considering that this weapon is designed to be fired after careful aiming, you'd probably want to use a two handed, braced stance.

That being said, I'm certain that there will be plenty of characters showing up in campaigns worldwide blazing away with a S&W Mod 500 in each hand.

As to the grain/ delivered energy issue, the values of 440 grains and 2600 ft/lbs are taken from the HC Cast Performance round, the heaviest Cor-Bon offers in .500 Magnum. There are two other, lighter rounds available, which deliver correspondingly less energy to the target.

Super Squirrel
Feb 18th, '03, 02:01 PM
In that case what I would do is build it STR Min 8, 1-1/2 Handed, Real Weapon. That way you can use it with one hand if you are STR 10. I would also go so far as to give it a limitation -2 OCV if STR is less than 12 when shot one handed.

Earthson
Feb 18th, '03, 03:25 PM
The Danger International rules list pistols firing rounds of similar caliber as 2d6 with a 14 STR Min and I would assume that this round would probably be in the same leauge. I've found "pepping" up some of the numbers listed in the books to be helpful for reducing the number of low powered NPC's that manage to shoot back in segment 6 and to make PC's respect a thug who has the jump on them, although I try and keep the range limits of handguns in mind too. Handgun loads have a big heavy bullet being pushed by not as much powder for a shorter period of time (down a shorter barrel). Its the weight of the slug that gives a large caliber handgun its knockdown ability not the diameter, but this also give a slug a lot of drag. A .50 cal machine gun bullet has a lot more powder in the cartridge and a considerably longer barrel (heavier slug too if memory serves correctly but this increase in weight is more than offset by the powder load) hence why a .50 machine gun bullet is listed as 3d6 (+1) and can carry for a mile or so (add a few skill levels to hit anything though). That 5 round cylinder comes from the fat rounds too.

I'd be curious to see how much of the muzzle velocity is left after 50 hexes.

SuperPheemy
Feb 18th, '03, 04:15 PM
Depends on the length of the barrel. I'm confident that the Model 500 could reach out and touch someone at a respectable distance with a 14" barrel. ;)

Of course it IS only a pistol. It only delivers about two thirds of the energy generated by a .30 Winchester Magnum round fired from a rifle.

I'd lower some of the STR mins for modern handguns. Advances in materials and recoil-compensation since DI first hit the shelves have made big, heavy handguns surprisingly easy to shoot.

SuperPheemy
Feb 18th, '03, 04:17 PM
A thought just occurred to me, I wonder how big of a Presence Attack bonus a character would get pointing a Model 500 with a 14" barrel at someone.

I'm reminded of the movie "Dogma", "We call this model the fecolater, one look and the target shits himself."

Tom
Feb 18th, '03, 06:26 PM
Originally posted by Old Man
I've heard secondhand of a "hobbyist" out here who constructed a single-shot bolt-action .50 BMG pistol from scratch. From what I understand it performed reasonably well, although the muzzle flash was about as lethal as the round itself.

The story goes that the BATF came down and asked him a couple of pointed questions, e.g. "That's the last gun you're going to build in that caliber, ever. Right?"

I have no idea where he gets the ammo.

I'm not sure of the legality of a pistol in that calibre off hand, but it's certainly nothing I ever want to fire... :eek:

As a side note, .50BMG is available on the commercial market though it is probably special order in most places and I figure most people would seek it out at gun shows. There are a number of commercially produced rifles chambered for .50BMG, mostly for guys who want a REALLY big gun for plinking with.... :rolleyes: ;) :D

JohnathanChance
Feb 18th, '03, 06:36 PM
Originally posted by Tom
I'm not sure of the legality of a pistol in that calibre off hand, but it's certainly nothing I ever want to fire... :eek:

As a side note, .50BMG is available on the commercial market though it is probably special order in most places and I figure most people would seek it out at gun shows. There are a number of commercially produced rifles chambered for .50BMG, mostly for guys who want a REALLY big gun for plinking with.... :rolleyes: ;) :D

At last check a Barret M-82 .50BMG rifle was selling for about 3 grand.

A note on the .475 Linebaugh, according to an article I read about a year ago in a reputable gun magazine, when this round first started seeing use in beg game hunting in Africa it was found to be able to put an African bull elephant down, permanently, with a single head shot. I know you might be thinking "Of course, they shot the elephant in the head!"
But an elephant's skull is if I remember correctly about 6" thick. Supossedly after one such shot the hunter wanted to check where his bullet ended up and found it not in the skull but in about the fourth vertebrae. That is a lot of bone to punch through!!

Toadmaster
Feb 18th, '03, 07:01 PM
Originally posted by Tom
I'm not sure of the legality of a pistol in that calibre off hand, but it's certainly nothing I ever want to fire... :eek:

As a side note, .50BMG is available on the commercial market though it is probably special order in most places and I figure most people would seek it out at gun shows. There are a number of commercially produced rifles chambered for .50BMG, mostly for guys who want a REALLY big gun for plinking with.... :rolleyes: ;) :D

There wouldn't be anything illeagal about it in the US but I think it probably violates a few laws of nature :rolleyes:

As far as ammo, I think most people reload their own for .50 cal Browning. The ammo for the machineguns is not loaded to extreme tolerances since it is to be used in a machinegun. For target work a higher quality of ammo is desirable. You can easily buy the components through mail order gun supply shops. Its not cheap and few reloading presses can handle a round that size which is an extra cost since you need to buy a large press for it. Also I think the Barrett is up to $6,000 or so, it was $3,000 in the eighties before the rash of gun grabber policies under the Clinton administration.

JohnathanChance
Feb 18th, '03, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by Toadmaster
There wouldn't be anything illeagal about it in the US but I think it probably violates a few laws of nature :rolleyes:

As far as ammo, I think most people reload their own for .50 cal Browning. The ammo for the machineguns is not loaded to extreme tolerances since it is to be used in a machinegun. For target work a higher quality of ammo is desirable. You can easily buy the components through mail order gun supply shops. Its not cheap and few reloading presses can handle a round that size which is an extra cost since you need to buy a large press for it. Also I think the Barrett is up to $6,000 or so, it was $3,000 in the eighties before the rash of gun grabber policies under the Clinton administration.

Hmm.. I could have sworn that it was a Barrett for sale at the last gunshow, but maybe it was a different company's gun.. or maybe it was a well worn personal transfer..

Old Man
Feb 19th, '03, 01:09 AM
Originally posted by JohnathanChance
At last check a Barret M-82 .50BMG rifle was selling for about 3 grand.

That's a pretty good deal. An H&K PSG-1 costs somewhere in the realm of 10-12K$, last time I saw it listed, which would have been over a year ago, maybe two.

Supossedly after one such shot the hunter wanted to check where his bullet ended up and found it not in the skull but in about the fourth vertebrae. That is a lot of bone to punch through!!

Um, how do you go about checking something like that? Did the guy just happen to have his chainsaw with him?

Earthson
Feb 19th, '03, 04:26 AM
One of the best in game uses I have for the .50 BMG, in a custom load with a FMJ (3d6+1 APRKA) round is in what is affectionately referred to as a "Wizard Killer" used to take our renegade mages. (I have a campaign rule that limits the rPD/rED in any cast magic) Heck, you have to make "Watched by Guild" mean something as a disadvantage.

I had a GM that used a similar weapon as a device in a low power superhero game that tested a few 20 point "Code Against Killings."

Tom
Feb 19th, '03, 06:01 PM
Originally posted by Old Man
That's a pretty good deal. An H&K PSG-1 costs somewhere in the realm of 10-12K$, last time I saw it listed, which would have been over a year ago, maybe two.

<...snip...>




Last MSRP I saw on a PSG-1 was $10K, however, unless things have changed with the new administration, it is no longer legal to import it into the country (BATF ruled it to be an assualt weapon since it would accept the high capacity magazines of the German G-3 rifle). Keep in mind that this cost include a hard case, scope, and bunches of accessories.

The Barret M-82A1 (last I looked a couple of years ago), ran in the $3K range for the base rifle and went up to something like $6K for the cased and scoped version.

Toadmaster,

I recall reading an article on handloading for the .50BMG quite a few years back (maybe up to 10 years ago, I really can't remember for sure), at that time there was only one comercially available press which was big enough to handle the cartridge. I can't recall who the manufacturer was, only that it was an "O-frame" press (if that helps any).

JohnathanChance
Feb 19th, '03, 06:29 PM
Originally posted by Old Man
That's a pretty good deal. An H&K PSG-1 costs somewhere in the realm of 10-12K$, last time I saw it listed, which would have been over a year ago, maybe two.



Um, how do you go about checking something like that? Did the guy just happen to have his chainsaw with him?



I don't know, I just remember reading that in an article about the .475

Super Squirrel
Feb 19th, '03, 08:29 PM
We need to do a twin study on this weapon.

Take a known gun from the book. Shoot the first twin and record the damage. Take the new gun and shoot the other twin. Compare the damage and convert.

Old Man
Feb 20th, '03, 01:05 AM
You know that wouldn't work. Have you seen the way gun hobbyists argue about kinetic energy and wound ballistics and energy transfer and hydrostatic shock? It makes the nastiest arguments here look like an episode of Teletubbies. There is no test in the world that will stop those debates.

Earthson
Feb 20th, '03, 04:06 AM
I hear Saddam has all of these body doubles running around...

AlHazred
Feb 20th, '03, 05:20 AM
Originally posted by Super Squirrel
We need to do a twin study on this weapon.

Take a known gun from the book. Shoot the first twin and record the damage. Take the new gun and shoot the other twin. Compare the damage and convert.

I hear the weapon is better than other .50 caliber weapons because it's a Magnum round. I want to know how they fit him in there...

gewing
Feb 20th, '03, 11:18 PM
Maybe it was used, or the single shot not the semi-auto?


I think the .500 might actually qualify for 2.5 f6, +1 stun, but I think the .50 BMG should be 3d6 + 1 +1 stun or aP

Something about 12000 ftlbs of energy...



Originally posted by JohnathanChance
Hmm.. I could have sworn that it was a Barrett for sale at the last gunshow, but maybe it was a different company's gun.. or maybe it was a well worn personal transfer..

Peregrine
Feb 21st, '03, 12:05 PM
Originally posted by gewing
Maybe it was used, or the single shot not the semi-auto?


I think the .500 might actually qualify for 2.5 f6, +1 stun, but I think the .50 BMG should be 3d6 + 1 +1 stun or aP

Something about 12000 ftlbs of energy...

Well, back in 4th, the .50BMG did 3d6. I think the damage listed for it in FRED is a typo, because there's no way a .50BMG and a 7.62 NATO do the same damage.

Time to invoke the Grandfather Clause.

gewing
Feb 21st, '03, 08:37 PM
Check teh FAQ, Steve said he doesn't know how he mis-typed that, IIRC.



Originally posted by Peregrine
Well, back in 4th, the .50BMG did 3d6. I think the damage listed for it in FRED is a typo, because there's no way a .50BMG and a 7.62 NATO do the same damage.

Time to invoke the Grandfather Clause.

Peregrine
Feb 22nd, '03, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by gewing
Check teh FAQ, Steve said he doesn't know how he mis-typed that, IIRC.

Which goes to show how carefully I didn't read the FAQ!

Thanks!