Agent 537
May 5th, '03, 11:23 AM
Our group is working up a House Rule for Duplication that I'd like to run by you all to see what you think. Here's some relevant campaign details:
For starting characters, the Active Point cap for non-attack powers (of which we consider Duplication to be) is 75 points. Basic points are 250 + 100.
We have a PC who can split into 5 bodies. Taking the 75 point max, and subtracting the +10 needed to get 4 extra bodies, we find that the Base form is restricted to 325 points (5 x 65 = 325). Taking from that 325 the 75, we have a Base form who has 250 points of other Powers, CHAs, etc. The 4 duplicates, in order to be identical to the base, are also comprised of 250 points, even tho the 65 points would allow them to be 325 points. In that case, however, the duplicates would each have 75 points of stuff that the Base form did not have.
Looking thru FREd and the FAQ doesn't seem to provide a solid solution to the problem. Duplication may well have to be rebuilt from the ground up someday, but that's not what we're trying to do here today.
Our proposed House Rule: since the supporting of the CONCEPT calls for the duplicates to be identical to the base form MINUS the Duplication power itself, the Duplicates are then OWED points (the 65 points, equalling 325, were paid, but only 50, equalling 250, were actually used). As the Base form advances, purchasing or buying off things with experience points, no points need be spent for the Duplicates' identical advancement UNTIL they reach the level of points for which they paid in the first place. Using the above example, the Duplicates would be allowed to advance another 75 points worth without spending another XP (they of course would keep pace with the Base form), until they reach 325 points. Thereafter, they would spend 1 point and advance 5 points, as per other established rules.
It may not be a perfect solution, and it certainly addresses only part of 'the problem' that Duplication proposes. Hell, it may not even be workable. What I welcome is your opinion on this. Have you thought of doing something like this? Did it work out okay? Is it just a bad idea, and if so, why? Lemme hear from you guys!
EDIT: It snuck up on me! I didn't realize that this was my 100th post! Yay for a 3-digit monkey!
For starting characters, the Active Point cap for non-attack powers (of which we consider Duplication to be) is 75 points. Basic points are 250 + 100.
We have a PC who can split into 5 bodies. Taking the 75 point max, and subtracting the +10 needed to get 4 extra bodies, we find that the Base form is restricted to 325 points (5 x 65 = 325). Taking from that 325 the 75, we have a Base form who has 250 points of other Powers, CHAs, etc. The 4 duplicates, in order to be identical to the base, are also comprised of 250 points, even tho the 65 points would allow them to be 325 points. In that case, however, the duplicates would each have 75 points of stuff that the Base form did not have.
Looking thru FREd and the FAQ doesn't seem to provide a solid solution to the problem. Duplication may well have to be rebuilt from the ground up someday, but that's not what we're trying to do here today.
Our proposed House Rule: since the supporting of the CONCEPT calls for the duplicates to be identical to the base form MINUS the Duplication power itself, the Duplicates are then OWED points (the 65 points, equalling 325, were paid, but only 50, equalling 250, were actually used). As the Base form advances, purchasing or buying off things with experience points, no points need be spent for the Duplicates' identical advancement UNTIL they reach the level of points for which they paid in the first place. Using the above example, the Duplicates would be allowed to advance another 75 points worth without spending another XP (they of course would keep pace with the Base form), until they reach 325 points. Thereafter, they would spend 1 point and advance 5 points, as per other established rules.
It may not be a perfect solution, and it certainly addresses only part of 'the problem' that Duplication proposes. Hell, it may not even be workable. What I welcome is your opinion on this. Have you thought of doing something like this? Did it work out okay? Is it just a bad idea, and if so, why? Lemme hear from you guys!
EDIT: It snuck up on me! I didn't realize that this was my 100th post! Yay for a 3-digit monkey!