Mad Fnorder
Mar 27th, '06, 05:57 PM
I know a valid construction is
6d6 EB (Real 30, Active 30)
+3d6 EB, Increased endurance, x2 (-1/2) (Real 10, Active 15)
Where the character can shoot the 6d6 version as normal, but the 9d6 version is limited by that chunk costing more END.
Now, is it reasonable to have, say....
Multiform (200 Character Points in the most expensive form) (x4 Number Of Forms) (50 Active, 50 Real)
+Multiform(+70 Character Points in the most expensive form), 1 Charge(-2)(14 Active, 5 Real)
(Assuming 270 wasn't breaking the upper bounds of the character's points, for argument's sake)
To simulate a person with a certain set of forms, plus an enchanced 270 point form with a significant limitation on its use?
Also, my sincerest Interweb apologies for the double post- the Edit button seems to have vanished for me, for some reason.
6d6 EB (Real 30, Active 30)
+3d6 EB, Increased endurance, x2 (-1/2) (Real 10, Active 15)
Where the character can shoot the 6d6 version as normal, but the 9d6 version is limited by that chunk costing more END.
Now, is it reasonable to have, say....
Multiform (200 Character Points in the most expensive form) (x4 Number Of Forms) (50 Active, 50 Real)
+Multiform(+70 Character Points in the most expensive form), 1 Charge(-2)(14 Active, 5 Real)
(Assuming 270 wasn't breaking the upper bounds of the character's points, for argument's sake)
To simulate a person with a certain set of forms, plus an enchanced 270 point form with a significant limitation on its use?
Also, my sincerest Interweb apologies for the double post- the Edit button seems to have vanished for me, for some reason.