nelay
Aug 23rd, '06, 09:52 AM
I am not sure how to word the questions without it becoming confusing, so I will provide an example to illustrate it.
In a Hero campaign where magic is restricted to INT/5 spells active at any given time we have a wizard with 20 INT (who can have 4 spells ready at any give time by the campaign rules).
The wizard decides to make all his spells delayed effect to take advantage of the ability rack the spells. He buys a firebolt spell (1d6 RKA, 3 charges per day, extra time 1 minute, delayed effect). If the wizard wants to prepare the fireball spell three times does it mean:
A. He uses three of his spell slots and each of those slots holds 3 firebolts.
B. He uses three of his spell slots, each one holding 1 firebolt?
As a followup, if the power wasn't delayed effect, does the 1 minute extra time only go to "activate" the whole power (He spends the 1 minute and can cast the 3 firebolts right away) or does each of those charges take a 1 minute?
I thought I knew the answers, but I have a player who is interpreting it differently than I do and he makes a compelling arguement.
Thanks for the great product and stellar support.
In a Hero campaign where magic is restricted to INT/5 spells active at any given time we have a wizard with 20 INT (who can have 4 spells ready at any give time by the campaign rules).
The wizard decides to make all his spells delayed effect to take advantage of the ability rack the spells. He buys a firebolt spell (1d6 RKA, 3 charges per day, extra time 1 minute, delayed effect). If the wizard wants to prepare the fireball spell three times does it mean:
A. He uses three of his spell slots and each of those slots holds 3 firebolts.
B. He uses three of his spell slots, each one holding 1 firebolt?
As a followup, if the power wasn't delayed effect, does the 1 minute extra time only go to "activate" the whole power (He spends the 1 minute and can cast the 3 firebolts right away) or does each of those charges take a 1 minute?
I thought I knew the answers, but I have a player who is interpreting it differently than I do and he makes a compelling arguement.
Thanks for the great product and stellar support.