View Full Version : Comic Books VS. Graphic Novels/Collections
FenrisUlf
Oct 16th, '06, 02:27 PM
Which do you buy, and why?
For myself, I've gone to almost exclusively to graphic novels for my superhero fix. They're cheaper than buying every issue of the original series/story-line, and you can read the whole story through at once.
Right now I'm enjoying Essential Thor Volume 1, for instance.
Sketchpad
Oct 16th, '06, 02:44 PM
I'd say buy whatcha like :) There's some great Essential and Showcase volumes out there, as well as some great stories that have been collected in trade format.
RDU Neil
Oct 16th, '06, 03:17 PM
I was buying all Marvels in GN format... but I've honestly run out of shelf space. I actually have more space in my 75 long boxes for comics.
Actually, I've begun to really stop buying comics, really, but when I do, GN format is appealing.
Captain Emu
Oct 16th, '06, 04:58 PM
Personally,
I buy individual issues for ongoing series and more obscure limited series. The big "event" limited series I wait for the compilations to come out.
OddHat
Oct 16th, '06, 05:58 PM
I only buy graphic novels these days, and then only if I know and like the writer or hear very good things about the story arc. I got out of comics almost completely in the early 1990s (continued to buy the Sandman TPBs and a few others), and really only started picking up TPBs again two or three years ago based on reccomendations on these boards.
keithcurtis
Oct 16th, '06, 06:07 PM
Seeing as the nearest comic shop is either two and a half hours or another country away (ferry trip either way), I get my comic fix through GN's borrowed from the public library. There are lots, check it out if you never have.
Keith "sigh. So remote." Curtis
secretID
Oct 16th, '06, 08:15 PM
All GNs - especially as many things these days seem to be written with that format in mind.
I never thought of trying the library - thanks for the idea.
transmetahuman
Oct 16th, '06, 10:13 PM
I'm another TPB-through-libraries reader. Stopped buying comics years ago, but you'd be amazed how many graphic novels & collections you can get through interlibrary loan these days. I was also pretty suprised at the mature content in some of what's available, since I assumed it was mostly kids checking them out - but now that I think about it, all of the titles from Superman to the rustiest iron age stuff *are* in the adult section.
It's a bit tough to read a series in order and without gaps sometimes, but you can't beat the price. And I don't have to get mad at myself for wasting my money when the writers do something reeeeeally stupid.
Teflon Billy
Oct 16th, '06, 10:54 PM
I would completely go over to TPB if I knew for a fact that Marvel would produce TPBs for all of their stuff.
As it is it's a crap shoot as to whether everything that I want to read will come out as a TPB (or if it'll come out in any reasonable timeline) so I get single issues for stuff that I like now.
If I was TPB only, I'd be more than a year behind on The Ultimates 2 and a few other series that I really enjoy.
I do however only get TPB for Ultimate Spiderman and Ultimate X-Men. And have only kept up with the Decimation of House of M by TPB as well.
TB
Spidey88
Oct 17th, '06, 02:06 AM
I have to say, Teflon Billy, I often wish I could read Ultimate Spider-Man (as well as many other books) in TPB format (I'm too much of a Spidey fanboy in general to wait, and buy the issues each month) - Bendis seems to pace stories veeeerrrrrrryyyy sssslllloooowwwwlllyyy. Then again, it may not be his fault a single conversation can take up half a stinkin' issue.
On that note, is it just me, or has pacing slowed down across the board comic-wise? Am I just getting more impatient as I get older, or is everything really taking that much longer to resolve? Perhaps I'm used to more overall action? Maybe I'm just getting a little too jaded with the medium...
Anyway, back on topic: I have to say, as an absolutely voracious reader, I really do like TPB's. Last week, I read the first six volumes of "Fables" in about three hours (while watching TV). Very satisfying to get all that at once! Ditto for "Invincible" a few weeks before.
The problem is, in addition to being too fast a reader for my own good sometimes, I'm also kind of a cheapskate when it comes to TPBs. I tend not to buy many, as most of the comics I'm interested in, I buy issue by issue - despite the fact that it's less cost-effective that way. I plan on expanding my classic Spidey collection via TPBs, though - those Essentials are probably a little cheaper than getting Amazing Spider-Man #21-40 individually. Of course, if I finish the time machine, I could save a bundle...
Wha - oh! Ummm, forget you read that. Yeah. Nothing to see here, move along...:ugly:
Bloodstone
Oct 17th, '06, 02:23 AM
I buy both, though I buy way more comics then I do TPB's.
wrestlinggeek
Oct 17th, '06, 04:58 AM
All TPB/Graphic Novels for me. I can't afford to buy comics every week. And I also get them from the library whenever I can. Which has actually gotten me to read a few things I otherwise wouldn't have.
teh bunneh
Oct 17th, '06, 06:50 AM
I've been slowly buying fewer and fewer monthly titles and more and more trade paperbacks. I like getting the whole story at once, but I don't like waiting months and months to get it. Trade-offs, I suppose. :)
FenrisUlf
Oct 17th, '06, 06:52 AM
Seeing as the nearest comic shop is either two and a half hours or another country away (ferry trip either way), I get my comic fix through GN's borrowed from the public library. There are lots, check it out if you never have.
Keith "sigh. So remote." Curtis
I read what I can find in local libraries too, though they don't have quite as much superhero/action-adventure as I like. Locally, one is overflowing with Dragonball Z and Ranma; but then, they have some of the Busiek Astro City and Marvels. They also have something titled Spyboy, which I like more than I thought I would.
But thanks for the recommendation.
bigdamnhero
Oct 17th, '06, 09:26 AM
More TPBs than actual comics. I don't read a lot of comics these days, generally only those recommended by friends. As a result, by the time I'm ready to check out a series it's usually out in TPB anyway. Once I get "caught up" I sometimes switch to picking up individual issues, depending on how much I'm into the story.
Vondy
Oct 17th, '06, 09:37 AM
I stopped reading comics for the most part, so I have nothing relevant to say, but that won't stop me from saying it anyways... :D
I think comics suffer from the open-ended format. I think they would do better to have planned arcs with beginnings, middles, and ends. Popular characters can be recurrent, as can themes, and minor threads from before could grow into a coming arcs major plot, but comic authors today have little sense of the art of storytelling. Its about skimpier costumes, bigger fights, and pushing sales for 300 issues. I don't think that's a realistic artistic, literary, or quality-focused model. As a result, I think graphic novels, and comics that have actual story structure are preferable. I know it wasn't intentional from a planning point of view, but Ruse had a strong beginning, middle, and satisfying end because, when they found out the company was going under, they started thinking about structure and plot and a good finale. And Planetary was saved, and remained good through its run, by the fact that it was never intended to go on forever. I think the iconics and popular teams would be well served by such a model as well: a planned arc of 6-18 issues; followed by a brief planning period and another planned arc. Time to think, and time to keep the structure and story clean.
bigdamnhero
Oct 17th, '06, 10:21 AM
I think comics suffer from the open-ended format. I think they would do better to have planned arcs with beginnings, middles, and ends. Popular characters can be recurrent, as can themes, and minor threads from before could grow into a coming arcs major plot, but comic authors today have little sense of the art of storytelling. Its about skimpier costumes, bigger fights, and pushing sales for 300 issues. I don't think that's a realistic artistic, literary, or quality-focused model. As a result, I think graphic novels, and comics that have actual story structure are preferable. I know it wasn't intentional from a planning point of view, but Ruse had a strong beginning, middle, and satisfying end because, when they found out the company was going under, they started thinking about structure and plot and a good finale. And Planetary was saved, and remained good through its run, by the fact that it was never intended to go on forever. I think the iconics and popular teams would be well served by such a model as well: a planned arc of 6-18 issues; followed by a brief planning period and another planned arc. Time to think, and time to keep the structure and story clean.
In general, I agree. Tho ironically, the industry seems to be already going that direction to a degree. The popularity of TPBs has led to many (if not most) series being plotted out in 6-issue arcs that can subsequently be neatly bundled into a TPB. Of course, that incurs its own set of problems: some storylines wind up being rushed to meet the arbitrary 6-issue limit, while other that could've/should've been wrapped up in 3 or 4 issues get stretched out longer than they need to be. But overall it seems to lead to tighter writing. (At least in the titles I read, which may not be a representative sampling.)
FenrisUlf
Oct 17th, '06, 02:19 PM
I think comics suffer from the open-ended format. I think they would do better to have planned arcs with beginnings, middles, and ends. Popular characters can be recurrent, as can themes, and minor threads from before could grow into a coming arcs major plot, but comic authors today have little sense of the art of storytelling. Its about skimpier costumes, bigger fights, and pushing sales for 300 issues. I don't think that's a realistic artistic, literary, or quality-focused model. As a result, I think graphic novels, and comics that have actual story structure are preferable. I know it wasn't intentional from a planning point of view, but Ruse had a strong beginning, middle, and satisfying end because, when they found out the company was going under, they started thinking about structure and plot and a good finale. And Planetary was saved, and remained good through its run, by the fact that it was never intended to go on forever. I think the iconics and popular teams would be well served by such a model as well: a planned arc of 6-18 issues; followed by a brief planning period and another planned arc. Time to think, and time to keep the structure and story clean.
I agree with this myself.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.