Nivaurum
Jul 30th, '03, 07:29 PM
I looked at a lot of related posts, but none really answered my question, so here goes...
I purchased the following END Reserves with a 1/4 Lim on the END only:
44 END (-1/4), 0 REC => 5 Active => 3 Real
45 END (-1/4), 0 REC => 5 Active => 4 Real
Of course, I did the zero REC to isolate the issue. From what I see, it appears that the Lim is applied to the fractional cost BEFORE the cost is rounded. So...
4.4 x (.8) = 3.52 => truncated to 3.5 => rounded to 3
4.5 x (.8) = 3.60 => truncated to 3.6 => rounded to 4
Is this behavior actually intended? I'm guessing it is, but I just wanted to make sure.
BTW, I check the same thing with COM and it behaves in the same manner. The cost of my toupee (IAF) is:
+13 COM (-1/2) => 7 Active => 4 Real
+14 COM (-1/2) => 7 Active => 5 Real
That's one sexy hairpiece!
I purchased the following END Reserves with a 1/4 Lim on the END only:
44 END (-1/4), 0 REC => 5 Active => 3 Real
45 END (-1/4), 0 REC => 5 Active => 4 Real
Of course, I did the zero REC to isolate the issue. From what I see, it appears that the Lim is applied to the fractional cost BEFORE the cost is rounded. So...
4.4 x (.8) = 3.52 => truncated to 3.5 => rounded to 3
4.5 x (.8) = 3.60 => truncated to 3.6 => rounded to 4
Is this behavior actually intended? I'm guessing it is, but I just wanted to make sure.
BTW, I check the same thing with COM and it behaves in the same manner. The cost of my toupee (IAF) is:
+13 COM (-1/2) => 7 Active => 4 Real
+14 COM (-1/2) => 7 Active => 5 Real
That's one sexy hairpiece!