core "modes" of gameplay

[Omnigames]

[...]

[pinecone]

[...]

I agree!

[aylwin13]

[...]
I have nothing else to contribute to this discussion.

[SteveZilla]

[...]

I agree!

I disagree!

[Doc Democracy]

We could save this as a classic example of board discourse. :)

[SteveZilla]

... Or bored discourse. :D

[pinecone]

I disagree!

Oh yeah, any who disagree are a bunch of big Doofusi!

[Captain Obvious]

Oh yeah, any who disagree are a bunch of big Doofusi!

The bands you like all suck!

[schir1964]

I think there is room in the tent for both sides of this discussion.

What was the original question again?

- Christopher Mullins

[Psybolt]

I think the original question was [...]

[Doc Democracy]

I think the original question was [...]

Well put. Repped. :celebrate

[BobGreenwade]

I think this entire thread is time, well, spent.

[The Monster]

I think it depends on the situation. Sometimes [...] is sufficient, but there are times and places where it's just not enough. There's no real rules about this; it's something that pretty much has to be gleaned from experience. The people involved have to communicate: preferences and desires, as well as overall goals, need to be taken into account when deciding whether [...] is useful or not - how much [...] is appropriate, how it is best applied, or even if it's useful at all. I know in my experience there have been times when I ignored [...] entirely (not always on purpose!), and people still enjoyed themselves, so it is possible. All in all, however, it's usually easier to keep the [...] - people usually expect it and might be put off if they don't have enough [...].
That's my $0.01985117169 anyway.

[Kdansky]

Certainly.

[aylwin13]

I think it depends on the situation. Sometimes [...] is sufficient, but there are times and places where it's just not enough. There's no real rules about this; it's something that pretty much has to be gleaned from experience. The people involved have to communicate: preferences and desires, as well as overall goals, need to be taken into account when deciding whether [...] is useful or not - how much [...] is appropriate, how it is best applied, or even if it's useful at all. I know in my experience there have been times when I ignored [...] entirely (not always on purpose!), and people still enjoyed themselves, so it is possible. All in all, however, it's usually easier to keep the [...] - people usually expect it and might be put off if they don't have enough [...].
That's my $0.01985117169 anyway.
I'm curious at to how [!?!] would interact with [...].

[Tech]

I agree!

I disagree and think [....]. Much more thought out.

[Cancer]

But [....] implies a note of finality that the OP clearly intended to exclude!

[The Main Man]

But now the ball is in my court, and I disagree!

[Tonio]

But that's how <insert other RPG> does it, so it won't work.

[Sean Waters]

But that's how <insert other RPG> does it, so it won't work.


...and where would Sir like this other RPG inserted?

:sneaky:

[SteveZilla]

I think discussion about [...] has become equal to :dh: