Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Science of Superheroes

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New Zealand (Once known as Godzone)
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,277
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    40760
    Actually,the reason that superheroes don't "Bulk Up" as you suggest is that their MASS wouldn't increase in proportion to their increased volume.The Hulk would end up like Bouncing Boy from the LSH.
    Besides while "other dimensions" exist according to string theory,it seems highly unlikely that they have the properties in real life that they have in comic books.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
    Age
    42
    Posts
    50
    Rep Power
    296214

    Science of Superheroes

    I bought the book, read the exact scientific reason for why Superman couldn't possibly exist, and then realised that I'd wasted my money. Do I really need a science book to tell me what every ten-year-old already knows?

    I was hoping for a book that would give me an idea of what aspects of superheroes could reasonably exist or what they would be like if they did exist. Instead I got an in-depth explanation of why the Fantastic Four are impossible. Stupid.

    For an idea of how to build superheroes using modified science check out Wild Cards volume 1.

    Way better.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    1800 WilliamsBurg RD,apt#31C Durham NC27707
    Age
    49
    Posts
    472
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    63351

    Re: Science of Superheroes

    Better yet Try the latest Wild Cards novel,Dueces Wild It may bring some light to the Wild Cards world sinces the events of the Black Trump trilogy.
    Have You also read the Science of Superman yet? If not check it out and compare it with the previous book.
    "I AM IMMORTAL! I HAVE INSIDE ME BLOOD OF KINGS![yeah yeah!]I HAVE NO RIVALS NO MAN CAN BE MY EQUAL!
    Queen "PRINCES OF THE UNIVERSE"
    Spookfully yours,
    The Phantom GameMaster

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    detroit, mi
    Posts
    234
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Science of Superheroes

    Quote Originally Posted by PhantomGM6101
    I've just checked out a book called THE SCIENCE OF SUPERHEROES
    If by any chance you see this book in a bookstore or a library,check it out, it might give you a laugh or couple of groans.
    saw the special on THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL--was not impressed....

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    55
    Posts
    383
    Rep Power
    1892

    Re: Science of Superheroes

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_A
    For an idea of how to build superheroes using [I
    modified[/I] science check out Wild Cards volume 1.
    Maybe. I am a HUGE fan of the Wild Cards series. It's my favorite set of stories. At first, I was really impressed with that "everything is psi-based" explanation.

    Now I'm not so sure it's all that much of an improvement.

    All they really did was use the same rubber-science buzzword for all powers. It doesn't really link to anything in the real world (Dr. Rhine notwithstanding).

    Think of it this way: if you took the word "psi" and replaced it with the word "witchcraft" or "balonium", would it really make any difference in terms of a real-world explanation? Introducing one fictional concept to explain many fictional concepts doesn't really accomplish much, now does it?

    However, as I said, I LOVED the Wild Cards books. Still do. If I could stay in one place long enough to justify a fiction collection again, it would be on top of my list.
    "I'm willing to suspend my disbelief, not hang it by the neck until dead"

    - Arthur Samuels

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    1800 WilliamsBurg RD,apt#31C Durham NC27707
    Age
    49
    Posts
    472
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    63351

    Rolleyes Re: Science of Superheroes

    I've also read about the Hulk and their explanation is totally short of ludicris. According to their thoeries there is only one way that a man can imitate the Hulks transformations and that is with steriods and something called GFP or something,never even once examining the effects of adrenilin .
    to qoute directly from this chapter:'Gamma rays are like light a form of electromagnetic radiation. Gamma rays are emitted by radioactive substances like Cesium137,cobalt60 and Uranium235. along with alpha and beta rays,gamma rays are emttied when a nuclear explosion takes place."
    "Hard radiation doesn't transform living cells.Nor does it cause certain glands to overreact and mutate human bodies. Hard radiation in large doses does one thing and it does that well: it kills. The Hulk just doesn't make sense according to his origin story. Niether do the Fantastic 4. Marvel's earliest heroes just are'nt possible and they never were."
    according to this the only way Bruce Banner can hulk out would to take a 'super steroid' and a chemical call GFP. Any ideas on what a character that would create? or the dangers of what drug use can do?
    Opinions every one[read Chapter three]
    Last edited by PhantomGM6101; May 9th, '04 at 12:20 PM.
    "I AM IMMORTAL! I HAVE INSIDE ME BLOOD OF KINGS![yeah yeah!]I HAVE NO RIVALS NO MAN CAN BE MY EQUAL!
    Queen "PRINCES OF THE UNIVERSE"
    Spookfully yours,
    The Phantom GameMaster

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    The moment.
    Age
    42
    Posts
    143
    Rep Power
    3898

    Re: Science of Superheroes

    [QUOTE=Lupus] I hated the Official Handbooks to the Marvel Universe. Its...
    100-ton strength limitation was ludicrous - totally blown out of the water by the comics themselves....
    QUOTE]

    Well, actually, it wasn't a limitation. "Class 100" strength specifically referred to being able to "lift (press) in excess of 100 tons". They never defined an upper limit to how much Class 100 characters could lift, like they did with anyone who could lift less than or equal to 100 tons. Basically, it just meant, "Strength Level: Really ****ing Strong".

    As far as books about scientific explanations of superpowers go, I see several ways to look at it; you can use real world science to show why they can't work (the Atom can't breathe if his lungs are too small to take in oxygen molecules, if you're exposed to radiation you'll get a painful blood disease and die, etc...), you can use pseudoscience to at least make it sound plausible (a la TOHOTMU DE), or you can use real world science to explore theories of what might be possible (check out The Physics of Star Trek by Lawrence M. Krauss for an example of this approach). I always think it's more fun to look at what is possible, rather than what isn't.

    Anyway, we know it's possible because the Superheroes can do it. I'm reminded of the episode of Futurama where Professor Farnsworth clones himself, and the young clone runs around explaining how the Professor's Smell-O-Scope and FTL Starship are impossible , ignoring the fact that, well, there they are.

    What? Superheroes aren't what? Aren't real?
    Are you sure?
    .................................................. ................

    I'm going to go lie down now.
    "Get real! I have no powers! I have no powers whatsoever!!" - Mr. Furious

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. My take on the Light Sabre
    By MisterVimes in forum Star Hero
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: Sep 9th, '11, 12:38 PM
  2. Superheroes and Endorsements
    By Blue in forum Champions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Jun 4th, '03, 06:51 AM
  3. What do you like in a science fiction setting?
    By Herolover in forum Star Hero
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May 12th, '03, 09:51 PM
  4. Wacky science skills
    By Tetsuyama in forum Champions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Mar 27th, '03, 01:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •