In the response to a clarification request, you wrote "While we're certainly not perfect here, we do make an effort to follow the rules as closely as we can, and to note exceptions where relevant."
I think the larger issue is that Hero Designer is pretty explicit about NOT making exceptions. The issue here is how flexible HD should be or not be. Practically speaking, those tolerable exceptions that are relevant I (and a few others anyway) feel should be reflected with warnings as opposed to errors BECAUSE (and to be on topic in this forum) THAT IS HOW THE RULES ARE - um, I think? An advantage not normally applied to something but granted once in a blue moon is...by the book? That is the crux of the question to me. And that is the real question - are the exceptions specifically indicated in the rules, well, for lack of a better word, rules themselves?
That then leads to the corollary they ought to be reflected in HD - though that is a separate conversation. Admittedly, I am setting up, as it were, the basis for that discussion which in and of itself does not apply to this forum.
To be clear, I am getting (temporarily) off my other soapbox and I am NOT talking about anything fundamental, such as changing algorithms or embedding frameworks inside frameworks. Rather, this is all about "is it publishable?".
Feel free to send this to a different forum, but, Steve, either way I'd be interested in your response. Thank you.




). We're not perfect, as I freely admit, and we'll correct any problems, oversights, or errors that arise as circumstances permit.

Bookmarks