When would one need Power Defense that was resistant?
When would one need Power Defense that was resistant?
"Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."
—Rorschach
killing attacks with AVLD attacking power defense...
And that's Lord Roy the Ruthless to you!
"steady men, here come those leaping skeletons of doom!"
Thanks, Roy!
"Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."
—Rorschach
no problem, thanks for your thread about loop character generation
And that's Lord Roy the Ruthless to you!
"steady men, here come those leaping skeletons of doom!"
Hmmm... Resistant Power Defense sounds like it has very limited functionality, because it's so highly specialized.
Still, I'm glad I know the answer to this question.
Wouldn't an NND (vs. Power Defense) KA with the Does BODY advantage also require resistant Power Defense to resist?
Still playing/running 5ER in Oklahoma City.
Probably, now that you mention it. Took me a few seconds to absorb all the aspects of that description.Originally Posted by Edsel
yes it would, but that'd be +2 vs +1.5 either way, special attacks need rPower, as opposed to regular drains and transforms
And that's Lord Roy the Ruthless to you!
"steady men, here come those leaping skeletons of doom!"
Ah, I don't think so.
I've never even heard of 'resistant' power defense. Or Flash Defense. Or Presence Defense. (If presence defense still existed, at least)
a Killing AVLD 'Power Defense' treats all presence defense as if it were already resistant, unless I'm very much mistaken.
Sort of on the 'AVLD must use an existing special defense' therory. NO ONE has resistant Power Defense. Therefore, it's not a valid defense for an AVLD.
---
"Ha! I'm useless against your weapons!!"
5ER, p.215: "Power Defense is not Resistant, but characters may purchase Damage Resistance for it."Originally Posted by Ura-Maru
"Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."
—Rorschach
Well, what do you know. I never noticed that. It's under Flash Defense, too.
I'd put it down as an oversight. My argument still stands. If you assume that thier default state is 'nonresistant', AVLD killing attacks have no defense at all. Unless I'm mistaken, no published characters, and no personal character I've ever seen, has 'resistant' power defense.
Seems like a fair question to ask Steve in 'Rules Questions'.
---
"If you try to cut the mochi, you'll never be able to do it."
AVLD KAs don't have Defense, and... no other kinds of Attacks have DEF, either. Attacks don't have DEF. I don't understand what you mean by "AVLD killing attacks have no defense at all." Explain?Originally Posted by Ura-Maru
I meant that there would be no defesnse _against_ them.
No, actually AVLD Powers must be directed against Flash Defense, Mental Defense, Power Defense, etcetera. So if it's an AVLD KA, only Resistant Mental, Flash, or Power Defense (whichever one the AVLD is selected for) would protect against it.Originally Posted by Ura-Maru
Last edited by Black Lotus; Jul 17th, '05 at 03:50 PM.
-shrug-
I suppose, if you applied everything literally. If you ignore the fact that no one HAS resistant Power Defense.
That's my point. AVLDs require you to take a defense for them, as you say. (and so did I, though not very well, it seems) I would consider 'a defense that no one in the history of the game has ever purchased' to be functionally equivalent to 'no defense.'
It's not like AVLD Killing Attacks are getting screwed doing it my way. 3d6N AVLD Does Body costs 52.5 points, and does 3 body and 10.5 Stun on average. 1d6K AVLD Does Body costs 52.5 points, and does 3.5 body and 8.75 Stun on average.
Roughly equivalent, no?
---
So if I take an AVLD drain, bought with its defense as Flash Defense, does that mean I have to buy Flash Power Defense to protect against it?![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks