Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: To gun fu or not gun fu?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Just past Chicagoland
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,005
    Rep Power
    43376

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    With a gun, in particular, I think it can be said that the extra damage represents accuracy.

    However, in the example I described above, of a baseball pitcher using his pitching techniques with a hurled attack, the extra damage (or lack thereof) could be force resulting from different pitching speeds.
    "Honey, did you feed the cat?" -- Anny Schrödinger, 31 June, 1934, 19:43

    "Maybe." -- Erwin Schrödinger, 31 June, 1934, 19:44

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Clifton.VA,USA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    2,165
    Rep Power
    315103

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hyper-Man View Post
    Ok, I'll concede to a point on the HTH Martial Arts. They can generate brute force as well as precision.

    But then why do the rules say subtract an additional 1d6 from the BODY of a Martial Arts attack when figuring Knockback?

    Also, how would a Ranged Martial Art maneuver cause a bullet to generate more damage from a gun if not precision?

    The main reason I can think off is not to get crazy knockback. You could make an argument for it being more en genre for MA attacks to deliver not equal knockback with bricks.

    Peregrine I'm afraid you'll never convince me a muay thai knee strike or spin kick does more damage because its more precise. Your point works for some attacks but not really for those sort of power attacks.

    Ranged MA would have to be precision but as we use hit locations, penalty levels and skill levels workk better for us.
    " Its not that there are too many fools on the Earth, its that the lightning isn't distributed properly" Mark Twain

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Clifton.VA,USA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    2,165
    Rep Power
    315103

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kenn View Post
    With a gun, in particular, I think it can be said that the extra damage represents accuracy.

    However, in the example I described above, of a baseball pitcher using his pitching techniques with a hurled attack, the extra damage (or lack thereof) could be force resulting from different pitching speeds.

    That makes sense to me.
    " Its not that there are too many fools on the Earth, its that the lightning isn't distributed properly" Mark Twain

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,759
    Rep Power
    222005

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    Quote Originally Posted by steamteck View Post
    The main reason I can think off is not to get crazy knockback. You could make an argument for it being more en genre for MA attacks to deliver not equal knockback with bricks.

    Peregrine I'm afraid you'll never convince me a muay thai knee strike or spin kick does more damage because its more precise. Your point works for some attacks but not really for those sort of power attacks.

    Ranged MA would have to be precision but as we use hit locations, penalty levels and skill levels workk better for us.
    Well, that's one of those little things called special effect. For a Muay Tai fighter, then calling it 'extra force' is perfectly appropriate. For an ancient master, it can be 'chi-power infusing the strike.' For a fencer, then 'expert precision' is entirely appropriate. It all depends on how you define the power...

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Clifton.VA,USA
    Age
    54
    Posts
    2,165
    Rep Power
    315103

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
    Well, that's one of those little things called special effect. For a Muay Tai fighter, then calling it 'extra force' is perfectly appropriate. For an ancient master, it can be 'chi-power infusing the strike.' For a fencer, then 'expert precision' is entirely appropriate. It all depends on how you define the power...

    I suppose you're right but being a fencer myself, I can definitely tell you a lunge, for example, has more real power than a thrust. Which is also a major part of my feeling about it since many strikes have more real power

    I guess my point is MA extra damage should not be exclusively defined by precision. Personally if it was I'd figure the extra damage was no good for most armor penetration unless one claims ones going for weak spots which in some cases just aren't conveniently were you'd like them to be.

    In the end we all go with what stays within our personal willing suspension of belief. I admit I tend to give guns less of a pass because they seem mundane and very unmystical.
    " Its not that there are too many fools on the Earth, its that the lightning isn't distributed properly" Mark Twain

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Trinity City
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,605
    Rep Power
    169560

    Re: To gun fu or not gun fu?

    Quote Originally Posted by steamteck View Post
    Peregrine I'm afraid you'll never convince me a muay thai knee strike or spin kick does more damage because its more precise. Your point works for some attacks but not really for those sort of power attacks.
    Nor was I trying to do so. Those are "hit with more force due to body mechanics+skill" examples. The "Precision"/NND stuff is nerve strikes, groin shots, joint locks, etc.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peregrine
    Civilization is a state of creative tension between barbarism and decadence. Any attempt to completely expunge either results in an inevitable and complete fall into the other - and thus the fall of civilization itself.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •