View Poll Results: Do you like it when a sourcebook uses optional rules it introduces

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes I do

    11 35.48%
  • Sometimes---Please Explain

    14 45.16%
  • No I do not

    6 19.35%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    7,769
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    644065

    Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Do you like it when a sourcebook uses optional rules it introduces?
    Come talk comics at http://www.kountrykomicsonline.com/forum/index.php

    The only thing common about common sense is the common lack of it

    ...'In this world, Elwood, you must be oh, so smart or oh, so pleasant.' For years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me."Harvey --- Thanks Hermit and BobGreenwade

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Antioch, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    4,796
    Rep Power
    1849025

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Shoot... I voted No, but realized afterward that I should have voted Sometimes. To me, it depends on what kind of supplement it is, what the rule is for, how it's used, etc. But by and large, I think they should be avoided if possible (substitute creative uses of the existing rules instead when you can), unless it's a main point of the supplement itself in some way. For example, I was fine with the Speed Zone being introduced in a book about speedsters, and I'm of course fine with anything in a book that's specifically about optional rules, like the APGs, etc.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    7,769
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    644065

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Well, I am sure most who have been following me know this is probably about the sourcebook I am working on, so if it helps to frame it: I am introducing an optional rule about everyman skills, and am debating if it should be included or not in the character section. It would be a campaign level rule, so it would effect all of the characters that are being designed to allow a group to start immediately, however the NPC's would be the only one effected, and other than some accounting oddities would not effect playability
    Come talk comics at http://www.kountrykomicsonline.com/forum/index.php

    The only thing common about common sense is the common lack of it

    ...'In this world, Elwood, you must be oh, so smart or oh, so pleasant.' For years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me."Harvey --- Thanks Hermit and BobGreenwade

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Antioch, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    4,796
    Rep Power
    1849025

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Personally, if it only affects costs, and not function, I couldn't care less. I wouldn't even consider it an "optional rule" or a "house rule" or whatever. I'd just see it as a suggested campaign ground rule, and call it good.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sedro-Woolley, WA.
    Age
    34
    Posts
    844
    Rep Power
    151991

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I voted "no". I do not like it when suplaments add new rules to the game I purchased as a complete game. I remember back when I played GURPS 3rd ed, it got to a point were I neeeded GURPS "The Complete Role-Playing Game", Compendium 1 and Compendium 2 just to have what are considered the basics. Personally, I like generic point based games for their completeness and I want my players to be able to invest ~$50 or so to have all the amunition they need not get stuck in the endless arms race like D&D were newer books release better or more options players with less money do not have the opertunity to access.

    PS. I personally buy suplaments for setting ideas and examples not extra rules.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    7,769
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    644065

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I want to thank you both for your comments,

    Ndreare, FYI-I plan on including a city, a section on characters (Heroic, Villains, and NPC's), and a section on the sub genre itself (not in that order). I also want to squeeze in a small adventure as well. Also all the rules added will be optional.
    Last edited by JmOz; Jan 16th, '12 at 07:06 PM.
    Come talk comics at http://www.kountrykomicsonline.com/forum/index.php

    The only thing common about common sense is the common lack of it

    ...'In this world, Elwood, you must be oh, so smart or oh, so pleasant.' For years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me."Harvey --- Thanks Hermit and BobGreenwade

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,233
    Rep Power
    892500

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I'm fine with it if.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Port Town
    Posts
    2,453
    Rep Power
    3327583

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I'm fine with it, in general.
    Systems I use: D&D 3.5, Pathfinder, Star Wars SAGA, Star Wars Revised Core Rules, GURPS 4th Edition, Shadowrun 4th Edition, Monte Cook's World of Darkness, New World of Darkness, Spycraft 2.0, d20 Modern, Alternity, Savage Worlds, HERO 6th Edition, and Mutants & Masterminds 2nd Edition.

    Quit bashing other systems: it isn't doing you any favors.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    460
    Rep Power
    56565

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I'm fine with it.
    What I don't like is when source books make use of rules (but don't include them) from sources other then the main (core) books.
    For example, if a source book referenced and required rules from either of the Hero Advanced Players Guides (but didn't include them in the supplement) I'd be pissed-off. Those are supposed to be optional rules, not required rules for running a game.
    "Where am I to go now that I have gone too far?"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    375
    Rep Power
    649808

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I'm fine with it, as long as they're genuinely optional.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Groombridge 34B, Marathon Free Station
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,658
    Blog Entries
    16
    Rep Power
    6174111

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I'm fine with it.

    OTOH, when a sourcebook includes optional rules and then doesn't use them, I'm left wondering "Why did they bother?"
    After the Terracide... 300 years from today, artificial space colonies orbit distant stars while terraformers labor to create new worlds for humanity. Bizarre aliens come to trade exotic goods unknown to Terran technology. And the lifeless, charred husk of mankind's homeworld slowly cools in the empty, silent void of a dead star system. Welcome to the rest of the Galaxy; It's Dark Out There.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sedro-Woolley, WA.
    Age
    34
    Posts
    844
    Rep Power
    151991

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I just reread my own post and realised how abrasive. It was. Sorry about that.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Pasadena Ca.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,450
    Rep Power
    567084

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    I see everyman skills as part of the setting description and not an optional rule
    Beast
    Yeoman Robert"Beast" Mitchell Yeoman of the Guard RPFS
    Vice Admiral Sir John Perrot Royal Order of the Tudor Rose NCRF
    Knotworking for a better tomorrow)
    Brutal Harmony (have no idea where that tenor came from I sing bass)
    Known superpower :Bodice Lacing

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bournemouth, UK
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,230
    Rep Power
    421497

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier Onassiss View Post
    I'm fine with it.

    OTOH, when a sourcebook includes optional rules and then doesn't use them, I'm left wondering "Why did they bother?"
    Absolutely - I would expect to see any new rules integrated into the sourcebook. If not, then they are probably not important to the material and, if they are not important to the material then why would you need a new rule anyway?

    OTOH it would be nice to have some guidance as to how to use the sourcebook WITHOUT the optional rules for those who want to integrate the material into an existing game where the new rule does not exist.
    ________________________________________

    The Ministry of Stupid Ideas

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    84
    Rep Power
    2742

    Re: Do you like it when a sourcebook...

    Sometimes, for me, the new and optional rules are the best part of a sourcebook. The good ones (rules) have the potential of making an appearance in my other games.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sourcebook artwork
    By MrAgdesh in forum Champions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Nov 30th, '09, 08:28 AM
  2. Which sourcebook will help me out the most?
    By Black_Hole_Wolf in forum Other Genres
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Aug 8th, '08, 02:13 AM
  3. Question: Sourcebook Inconsistancies?
    By crayadder in forum Fantasy Hero
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Feb 21st, '08, 04:38 PM
  4. China Sourcebook
    By Metaphysician in forum Champions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Aug 22nd, '05, 04:07 AM
  5. Viper sourcebook?
    By chariot in forum Online Store & Cafe Press Questions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Mar 24th, '05, 02:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •