Jump to content

Wonder Woman


Greywind

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 846
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, quite frankly, I'd rather watch a hottie like Gadot over a giantess like Chyna any day. I don't care that Gadot isn't as physically intimidating as "the real Wonder Woman" (ha!). She's smokin' hot and looks great as WW. That's good enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general I believe there are many things that Hollywood fails at regularly. I have gone on record repeatedly expressing the opinion that Hollywood writers are mostly lazy, sloppy, mediocre hacks that don't deserve to be called writers. However, there are many things which are legitimately difficult to do in the realm of filmmaking. Casting humans as superheroes is one of them.

Having met a few screenwriters and talked with a number of people in the biz, it seems like the problem is less that Hollywood writers are hacks than that filmmaking is a collaborative art form where the scriptwriter has less clout than the key grip. The original script may well have been brilliant, or at least coherent. But then the producer brings in his re-writer to make it "30% funnier." And the Director insists there has to be a Giant Spider in Act 3 so he brings in his re-writer. Then the stars come on board with their own re-writers as part of the deal. Etc etc. Not saying all screenwriters are geniuses, but the more I hear about how Hollywood works, blaming screenwriters for bad movies is akin to blaming the engineer who designed your car's engine for the bad paint job.

 

TV is of course a different situation, where writers have much more input & control. There the big enemy is just the speed of cranking out a new 60-minute script every week,

 

As for casting people who look like superheroes (ie bodybuilders), that's one of the things that made 80s superhero movies so...distinctive. Gadot may not look like my ideal picture WW, but I'll happily overlook that if she can act the part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a fair point about film screenwriters. In that realm, I agree with you that the problem is the interference from people who imagine themselves to be far more adept at storytelling than they are, or who whole-heartedly believe in placing commercial concerns ahead of creative ones no matter how ruinous it is to the quality of the results.

 

In television, however, you have writing teams headed up by a showrunner. These teams are large because they are writing scripts in parallel to keep up with the schedule, which by the way isn't really weekly. Episodes are written in chunks, produced in chunks, and then rolled out months later on a vaguely weekly schedule (with plenty of interruptions for holidays, awards shows, sporting events, and all manner of other unexplained "hiatuses"). The only reason why the quality of writing is often so low on shows is because dramatic writing is hard (almost as hard as comedic writing), and the number of truly gifted writers who can produce on a deadline is small. The vast majority are writer wannabes, each with their own, um, interesting story as to how they got onto a writing team in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you body shaming Gal Gadot? Absolutely not.

 

Can any woman who has ever existed play a great actress, who is 6 feet with huge breasts and has the body of an incredibly powerful fighter? NO. OBVIOUSLY.

 

Gal Gadot is fine...until she proves she cannot act.

She doesnt have to have huge breasts. That was just what Linda Carter brought to the table that comic artists picked up and ran with. She just needs to appear as the pinnacle of an Amazonian warrior princess, which Gadot simply doesnt fit to me. I thought she did fairly well with what little we saw in bvs, at this juncture, the only problem I have with her is the lack of muscle mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She doesnt have to have huge breasts. That was just what Linda Carter brought to the table that comic artists picked up and ran with. She just needs to appear as the pinnacle of an Amazonian warrior princess, which Gadot simply doesnt fit to me. I thought she did fairly well with what little we saw in bvs, at this juncture, the only problem I have with her is the lack of muscle mass.

 

I think the issue is that while Gadot is tall, she is slim rather than athletic. She is, despite her height, a bit "waifish." Wondy should be athletic without crossing the line into "bodybuilder ripitude." Finding a woman who is tall enough, and has the right chassis and fitness level, isn't easy. Taller women tend towards slimness or thickness. Tall female athletes who aren't basket-ball players (lanky) are few. There are women out there who have the right combination of athleticism and height, but how many are actresses?

 

It would be far easier to find a female athlete standing 5'6"-5'8" who had the right overall physique, but people would complain she was too short. That's the problem with trying to cast characters of Homeric proportion: you have to find performers to meet those proportions. Wondy is a very hard bill to fill. As a result, I'm fine "settling" for an actress who is a "reasonable" approximation. For me, tall and slim, or mid-height and athletic, are both acceptable choices. And, I agree about Wondy's breasts. There was nothing wrong with Linda Carter's Wondy, but its not essential to the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She doesnt have to have huge breasts. That was just what Linda Carter brought to the table that comic artists picked up and ran with. She just needs to appear as the pinnacle of an Amazonian warrior princess, which Gadot simply doesnt fit to me. I thought she did fairly well with what little we saw in bvs, at this juncture, the only problem I have with her is the lack of muscle mass.

 

Fair enough, I was speaking more to the fan who has completely written her off for the part and won't even give her or the movie a chance due to unrealistic expectations.  That is nonsensical to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue is that while Gadot is tall, she is slim rather than athletic. She is, despite her height, a bit "waifish." Wondy should be athletic without crossing the line into "bodybuilder ripitude." Finding a woman who is tall enough, and has the right chassis and fitness level, isn't easy. Taller women tend towards slimness or thickness. Tall female athletes who aren't basket-ball players (lanky) are few. There are women out there who have the right combination of athleticism and height, but how many are actresses?

 

It would be far easier to find a female athlete standing 5'6"-5'8" who had the right overall physique, but people would complain she was too short. That's the problem with trying to cast characters of Homeric proportion: you have to find performers to meet those proportions. Wondy is a very hard bill to fill. As a result, I'm fine "settling" for an actress who is a "reasonable" approximation. For me, tall and slim, or mid-height and athletic, are both acceptable choices. And, I agree with the breasts comment.

 

There was nothing wrong with Linda Carter's busty Wondy, but its not strictly necessary to do the character justice.

 

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I was speaking more to the fan who has completely written her off for the part and won't even give her or the movie a chance due to unrealistic expectations.  That is nonsensical to me.

Ugh, I just had a conversation with such a fan a little while ago in a chatroom.  I eventually had to put him on ignore to get away from the stupid.  He lost me when he declared this casting destroyed everything Wonder Woman stood for as a character, then claimed that Wonder Woman is meant to be six foot two and two hundred thirty pounds.  :stupid:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...