Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Christopher said:

Typical.

 

Republicans complained "Obama kileld more people with Drones". Trump already surpassed him in his first year.

 

"We have to take out their families." wasn't contested much. Or, at least, it wasn't contested enough to the point where the man who uttered that phrase had to recant his barbaric sentiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, assault said:


"I hate Illinois Nazis."

 

Actually, that scene from Blues Brothers is a bit weird today. Driving a car through a crowd is less of a joke.

I kind of feel bad for Illinois Republicans. I saw a quote from his opponent, that the Nazi does not represent the values of the District or State, but I don't think he even represents the Republicans of his District.  A party organizer was lamenting that it was hard to get anybody to run, because it was such a deep-blue district, what was the point? So they wind up with loons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Sociotard said:

I kind of feel bad for Illinois Republicans. I saw a quote from his opponent, that the Nazi does not represent the values of the District or State, but I don't think he even represents the Republicans of his District.  A party organizer was lamenting that it was hard to get anybody to run, because it was such a deep-blue district, what was the point? So they wind up with loons.

I doubt this will ever stop being such a Blue State, if they do not put up decent candidates.

If all I ever saw as Republican Candidate in my district was a holocaust denier, it says something about the party. And it is "look how normal and voteable we are".

 

A party is supposed to filter out such people, so they do not become the face of the party in a region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Christopher said:

A party is supposed to filter out such people, so they do not become the face of the party in a region.

 

I agree. Part of the problem is that in the US parties are weak. We gave up the "smoke filled back rooms" where party officials would decide who could and could not run with the party affiliation.  Were those rooms still around, they'd say "no holocaust deniers, even if this is all we could get. Better to let the democrat run unopposed than let our brand be damaged."

 

But we don't. We Americans cringed at the idea of those rooms, and thought things should be more democratic. So, if there isn't much Primary opposition to the Nazi, the Nazi gets to run with an (R) next to his name. We have thrown a baby out with its bathwater.

 

https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2016/11/3/13512362/weak-parties-strong-partisanship-bad-combination

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Christopher said:

A party is supposed to filter out such people, so they do not become the face of the party in a region.

 

Unless the party is comprised only of those people, and they don't have a reasonable-sounding dogwhistle guy they can elect to pretend they're normal and voteable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...