GCMorris Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 Haven't seen this covered yet but I'm sure it has been. A player has a brick with 4 arms and he wants to be able to Grab and punch whilst doing Grab maneuver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netzilla Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 Extra Limbs for certain. Extra SPD, Only to Punch (-1) as a possible add-on. If you have them, check the Champions Villains books for the Grond write-up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
massey Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 Extra limbs will cover being able to grab someone, and then on a new phase punch them while they are still grabbed. This is just a special effect anyway, really. You can already squeeze for Str damage after you've grabbed someone. Punching them shouldn't really cost any more points. If you want something that is mechanically different than what you can already do for free, you may want to look at the Crush martial arts maneuver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 Extra limbs will cover being able to grab someone, and then on a new phase punch them while they are still grabbed. This is just a special effect anyway, really. You can already squeeze for Str damage after you've grabbed someone. Punching them shouldn't really cost any more points. If you want something that is mechanically different than what you can already do for free, you may want to look at the Crush martial arts maneuver. What if you want to add your HA to said punch? I've always treated this situation as Multiple Attack - two arms to grab (or maintain a grab), and then a punch. You technically get the -2 (? Can't remember the penalt) for a one hand hold, though - since the extra limbs write up basically spells out that it's a fluff power (hence 2 extra arms or a hundred costing the same) that might come up out of combat every once in a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 I think the idea of multiple attacks was made for this however if you want a mechanical solution though perhaps a linked attack? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
massey Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 What if you want to add your HA to said punch? You paid for extra limbs. You can use your hand attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfrunswithfox Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 I've had good luck using the trigger modifier to model characters who can do more than a normal person in a single action. In this case, adding a Trigger: When a grab maneuver succeeds to the character's hand attack would create the effect it sounds like you're looking for (plus extra limbs for the arms themselves, as others have stated). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 You paid for extra limbs. You can use your hand attack. Hmm. I suppose that's not much different than buying extra damage classes with martial attacks and taking crush (both 4 per d6 at base) - except for the HA can be advantaged. My knee jerk reaction was 'no' but it's a fair point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsatow Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 You can probably do the multiple attack option but the target retains their full DCV until after the maneuver completes. If you use the multiple limb method, you may also want to buy ambidexterity as all extra limbs are considered by default off hand limbs. Personally I would write it up as: Multiple limbs (X extra arms) Ambidexterity (no penalty) HA +Xd6 triggered (after grab), requires a to hit roll. (side note: I have a villain who had this but the HA was also autofire 3) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Personally I never messed with ambidexrerity in game. That is definately a ymmv and talk to GM guidelines. : ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Wondering if damage shield with grab would work and be more simple? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsatow Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 Wondering if damage shield with grab would work and be more simple? I thought about it but for me, the damage shield was not target specific and would work on anyone touching the character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 I thought about it but for me, the damage shield was not target specific and would work on anyone touching the character. only if you paid the points for it. Iirc as of 5th, damage at base level only goes off if you grab the target and must pay more if anyone touches you are affected by damage shield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsatow Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 only if you paid the points for it. Iirc as of 5th, damage at base level only goes off if you grab the target and must pay more if anyone touches you are affected by damage shield. If you bought a base damage shield and grab the person, the damage shield would go off and strike the person grabbed. If someone tapped you on your shoulder while you were grabbing the target, you will do damage to the person tapping you on your shoulder. If your teammate picked you up while you were grabbing the target, your teammate would also be hit by the damage shield. That is why I would say that damage shield is not target specific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 Isn't it possible to define a damage shield as only working with a grab? Lucius Alexander The palindromedary thinks a Trigger is what's called for anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
massey Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 Isn't it possible to define a damage shield as only working with a grab? Lucius Alexander The palindromedary thinks a Trigger is what's called for anyway I think that's just called a no range attack, linked to grab. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 If you bought a base damage shield and grab the person, the damage shield would go off and strike the person grabbed. If someone tapped you on your shoulder while you were grabbing the target, you will do damage to the person tapping you on your shoulder. If your teammate picked you up while you were grabbing the target, your teammate would also be hit by the damage shield. That is why I would say that damage shield is not target specific. Thats not how I read it. If I have shock gloves defined as damage shield-grab and I attack a target and someonr grabs me, I don't see the grabber being attacked by my damage shield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombrown803 Posted March 18, 2017 Report Share Posted March 18, 2017 Thats not how I read it. If I have shock gloves defined as damage shield-grab and I attack a target and someonr grabs me, I don't see the grabber being attacked by my damage shield. You would need to put a limitation on the damage shield for it to work that way, otherwise it works as Lucius stated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 You would need to put a limitation on the damage shield for it to work that way, otherwise it works as Lucius stated Well I stand corrected :-). So what value of a lim. only grab target be worth? -1/2 or -1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 I think that's just called a no range attack, linked to grab. I can Link a Power to another Power. I'm not so sure I can Link a Power to a Maneuver. Lucius Alexander Linked to a palindromedary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netzilla Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 Thats not how I read it. If I have shock gloves defined as damage shield-grab and I attack a target and someonr grabs me, I don't see the grabber being attacked by my damage shield. You would need to put a limitation on the damage shield for it to work that way, otherwise it works as Lucius stated Well I stand corrected :-). So what value of a lim. only grab target be worth? -1/2 or -1? Since someone grabbing/attacking you doesn't take damage and it only does damage if you initiate a grab, I wouldn't call that a damage shield at all. It's a hand attack that only enhances grabs. OTOH, if someone grabbing/touching your gloves takes damage without you initiating the action, then that would be a limited form of damage shield (maybe lower it from +1/2 to +1/4). If it also works when you punch someone, then that's an 'offensive' damage shield, which costs an extra +1/4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Neilson Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 I can Link a Power to another Power. I'm not so sure I can Link a Power to a Maneuver. The power could be limited to work only against a target that has been Grabbed. If the Grab fails, so does that power's attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 I can Link a Power to another Power. I'm not so sure I can Link a Power to a Maneuver. Lucius Alexander Linked to a palindromedary I believe Hyper-Man asked Steve Long about putting Limiations on martial manuevers and he said yes though UMA omly.covers advatages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted March 20, 2017 Report Share Posted March 20, 2017 I am now completely confused as to what we are talking about. Lucius Alexander The palindromedary says I may have grabbed the wrong end of the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja-Bear Posted March 20, 2017 Report Share Posted March 20, 2017 Well there is something about four arms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.