Our hero has an OAF (Durable, Easily Replaced) shield that provides 10HA's in offensive capability in addition to its defensive properties. Our hero has also taken a weapon familiarity for a shield to represent knowing how to use it as a weapon. Per RAW on 6eV2 p70, when performing a Move By, "The weapon, not the character, takes the one-third damage from the Move By. If the BODY damage done to the target exceeds three times (3x) the weapon’s base Damage Classes, the weapon breaks.")
Question: Given the special effects and WF as above, can the same logic (i.e. the weapon, not the character, takes the damage associated with the maneuver) reasonably be applied to a Move Through performed by our hero using his shield ... and would you allow it to do so if you were the GM?
Question
Surrealone
Scenario:
Our hero has an OAF (Durable, Easily Replaced) shield that provides 10HA's in offensive capability in addition to its defensive properties. Our hero has also taken a weapon familiarity for a shield to represent knowing how to use it as a weapon. Per RAW on 6eV2 p70, when performing a Move By, "The weapon, not the character, takes the one-third damage from the Move By. If the BODY damage done to the target exceeds three times (3x) the weapon’s base Damage Classes, the weapon breaks.")
Question:
Given the special effects and WF as above, can the same logic (i.e. the weapon, not the character, takes the damage associated with the maneuver) reasonably be applied to a Move Through performed by our hero using his shield ... and would you allow it to do so if you were the GM?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts