Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

System quirks (your favorite or least favorite)


  • Please log in to reply
95 replies to this topic

#1 DasBroot

DasBroot

    Bat-Noogier

  • HERO Member
  • 1,212 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:37 AM

HERO's a great system but it definitely has some quirks that people find amusing, distracting, or annoying.

 

One of mine is falling damage vs move-through damage.

 

HERO assigns a max falling speed (terminal velocity) of 60 meters per segment for 30d6 damage. Oof.

 

The thing is... a move through attack that impacted at 60 meters per segment (ie: a character using  a movement power, a car, etc) inflicts strength + v/6.  So a car with a 'str' of 20 inflicts 14d6 if it moves 60 before hitting you.

 

That's half the damage of striking the ground after falling the same distance in the segment.

 

Why? What makes falling so much more dangerous than being hit by a car travelling at the same distance in that segment? Or a hero strong enough to lift the Statue of Liberty (70) with the same action (14d6 + 10d6 = 24d6)?

 

What's yours?

 

(Open for discussion of anyone's specific quirk as well as adding your own.)


"I threw a rock at him!"

*silence*

".... it was a *big* rock."


#2 jdounis

jdounis

    Skilled Normal

  • HERO Member
  • 70 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 12:43 PM

Mine are the following, i would really love to see them fixed/clarified in a revision:

 

Minor stuff:

 

  • DCV of inanimate objects.
  • Rounding rules(i really love systems with a definite standard rule everywhere).

Major Stuff:

 

  •       Per character phase effects(especially environmental effects acting per character phase)
  •       "Artificial" effects on  rules for the sake of balance(i.e. Remaining Multiple attacks wasted on first failed attack, Adjusting Frameworks Rules)


#3 dsatow

dsatow

    Bionic Occult Mutant Alien Samurai Hero

  • HERO Member
  • 947 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 12:44 PM

Don't forget to include the vehicle's speed.  Most vehicles are speed 3 or 4 and moves in phases.  So in order to match that velocity, you need to multiply that speed by 3 or 4.


  • DasBroot likes this

#4 dsatow

dsatow

    Bionic Occult Mutant Alien Samurai Hero

  • HERO Member
  • 947 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:00 PM

System quirks:

  • 1 point of resistant an never be armor pierced.
  • you apply your full normal defenses if you have 1 pip of resistant against the stun.  Even against a 10d6K.
  • 1 pip of impenetrable defense stops all penetration, no matter how massive
  • 1" of gliding can effectively prevent you from falling to damage but can't stop you from being knocked back
  • a normal who works at his job 9-5 after 5 years will probably only have an 11- or 12-.
  • Buying a knife with points is equivalent in cost to hitting the lottery (buying wealth).
  • No matter how dense you become, you never generate a gravity field.
  • You have over a 75% change to hit a hex right next to you but only a 50% chance to hit one 6' away
  • Boxing matches never last more than 1 round (3 minutes).

 

Note I house rule a lot of these for sanity's sake.



#5 Surrealone

Surrealone

    Cosmically Powerful Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 926 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:07 PM

According to the STRENGTH TABLE, an average normal with STR 8 has a lifting capacity of 75kg, where lifting capacity means the maximum amount of weight s/he can just manage to lift off the ground, stagger with for a step or two, then drop.  Also according to the STRENGTH TABLE, examples of 75kg (i.e. ~165lbs) include a brass bed and a washing machine.

 

When was the last time you saw someone you would consider STR 8 ... single-handedly pick up a washing machine without any assistance or leverage ... stagger  a few steps with it completely off the ground, and then drop it?  How about a brass bed?

 

Yea, I thought so...


  • GM Joe likes this

"Evolutionary creativity always renders invalid the 'law of large numbers' and acts in an elitist way."

                                                                  -- Erich Jantsch, The Self-Organizing Universe


#6 DasBroot

DasBroot

    Bat-Noogier

  • HERO Member
  • 1,212 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:18 PM

Don't forget to include the vehicle's speed.  Most vehicles are speed 3 or 4 and moves in phases.  So in order to match that velocity, you need to multiply that speed by 3 or 4.

 

That's why I took a chunk out of my original post that addressed that: It just leads to a further mess whereas the more actions a vehicle can take (higher than 2 speed) the less damage it inflicts (and therefore takes)  on a move through in a situation where it's moving at a non-combat rate (ie: driving into a wall) compared to a vehicle with less SPD but the same velocity.

 

Also most drivers have speed 2 so either a) they can only drive the car at half the speed of a driver with speed 4 in a speed 4 vehicle (even out of combat, if you've based the vehicles maximum velocity around taking 4 actions with non-combat multipliers) or b ) as I mentioned above the guy with speed 2 will hit twice as hard because to be going the same speed he needs to be moving twice the distance on each of his phases.

 

Neither are particularly appropriate outcomes - I have no doubt that a professional demolition derby driver (combat driving and a higher speed) will find more opportunities to take shots at me or avoid my clumbsy attempts to hit him, provided his vehicle is nimble enough (higher speed).  I also have no doubt that we can both drive his speed 4 car down a highway at its maximum velocity and that if we hit a wall the same thing will happen to the car, us, and wall regardless.

 

The vehicle rules in general are pretty clunky, though, and worthy of  their own post (this one!) - it's why I threw in the example of a super strong character ramming you being less devastating than hitting the ground at HERO'S terminal velocity.


"I threw a rock at him!"

*silence*

".... it was a *big* rock."


#7 Surrealone

Surrealone

    Cosmically Powerful Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 926 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:27 PM

  • Adjustment powers fade by default at the rate of 5 points per turn, but RAW tells GMs to do this fade bookwork during post-seg12 rather than 12 segments after the use of the adjustment power.  This translates to characters never getting the full turn (12 segments) of adjustment for which they pay unless a GM house rules the fade bookwork being done 1 turn (12 segments) from when the adjustment power was used.
  • 15 CP spent on Wealth can have more impact on a government, election, etc. than 15 CP spent on Mind Control.

  • DasBroot likes this

"Evolutionary creativity always renders invalid the 'law of large numbers' and acts in an elitist way."

                                                                  -- Erich Jantsch, The Self-Organizing Universe


#8 DasBroot

DasBroot

    Bat-Noogier

  • HERO Member
  • 1,212 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:37 PM

System quirks:

  • 1 point of resistant an never be armor pierced.
  • you apply your full normal defenses if you have 1 pip of resistant against the stun.  Even against a 10d6K.
  • 1 pip of impenetrable defense stops all penetration, no matter how massive

 

Note I house rule a lot of these for sanity's sake.

 

Indeed.  You have to buy AP or Penetrating for your entire blast to get the full benefit  - why wouldn't you have to buy their counters  for all the sources of PD/ED you wish to apply against said blast to get the full benefit?

 

As for number 2, though - we used to accidentally only apply rPD/rED against stun from killing attacks.  The result was lots of people had lots of resistant armor.  Once we corrected it the meta-game changed to mix resistant and non-resistant to save some points.  So instead of a brick buying 30 resistant in a 12 DC game he'll buy 20 resistant and 10 non (10 points is 10 points. 20 if he buys both the same way).

 

On the plus side, though, it did allow someone who WANTED to take a little body from most killing attacks buy 10 r and  20 normal = he bleeds without being taken out by the stun, so I don't mind it.


"I threw a rock at him!"

*silence*

".... it was a *big* rock."


#9 Chris Goodwin

Chris Goodwin

    Social justice globehead

  • HERO Member
  • 4,400 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 03:40 PM

HERO's a great system but it definitely has some quirks that people find amusing, distracting, or annoying.

 

One of mine is falling damage vs move-through damage.

 

HERO assigns a max falling speed (terminal velocity) of 60 meters per segment for 30d6 damage. Oof.

 

The thing is... a move through attack that impacted at 60 meters per segment (ie: a character using  a movement power, a car, etc) inflicts strength + v/6.  So a car with a 'str' of 20 inflicts 14d6 if it moves 60 before hitting you.

 

That's half the damage of striking the ground after falling the same distance in the segment.

 

Why? What makes falling so much more dangerous than being hit by a car travelling at the same distance in that segment? Or a hero strong enough to lift the Statue of Liberty (70) with the same action (14d6 + 10d6 = 24d6)?

 

 

Character movement is counted per Phase rather than per Segment.  If the Move Through-er is SPD 5, that 60 meters per Phase comes out to 300 meters per Turn, approximately 56 mph.  60 meters per Segment comes out to 720 meters per Turn, approximately 135 mph.  If that same SPD 5 move-through-er had 144 meters of Running (720 meters per Turn, same as terminal velocity), that move through would then do 24d6 from velocity alone, a lot more comparable.  


  • PhilFleischmann and DasBroot like this

Chris Goodwin
The Big Thread of Helpful HowtosThe Unofficial HERO System Forum | HERO System Low Heroic Protocols | Old School ChampionsHow to Play HERO System | Robot Warriors to HERO System Current Editions
 
There are two paths your character can take into the game: the path of the game guidelines document, or the path of the Character Approver 9000. Choose your path wisely.


#10 zslane

zslane

    The Monster From the Clock

  • HERO Member
  • 2,698 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 05:48 PM

  • Adjustment powers fade by default at the rate of 5 points per turn, but RAW tells GMs to do this fade bookwork during post-seg12 rather than 12 segments after the use of the adjustment power.  This translates to characters never getting the full turn (12 segments) of adjustment for which they pay unless a GM house rules the fade bookwork being done 1 turn (12 segments) from when the adjustment power was used.

 

The groups I played with actually did all the extra bookkeeping necessary to track when each Adjustment attack occurred so that the fade/return would happen on the correct Segments (including tracking the points of effect from each attack separately if necessary). We didn't resort to the simplifying procedure of doing it as part of post-Segment 12 Recoveries.


  • Surrealone likes this

#11 BoloOfEarth

BoloOfEarth

    Smell? It Sphinx!

  • HERO Member
  • 10,709 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 06:45 PM

  • 1 point of resistant an never be armor pierced.

 

Not quite sure what you're saying here.  Do you mean 1 point of Hardened?  Or do you mean 1 point of Resistant defense?


"Sometimes getting PCs together is like herding kittens...nuclear powered kittens at that." - phoenix240

"The Internet. It's like an idiot assembly plant." - Lawnmower Boy


#12 Hyper-Man

Hyper-Man

    Caped Madman!

  • HERO Member
  • 14,860 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 07:22 PM

1 point of resistant cannot be reduced by armor piercing.

Hm

#13 mrinku

mrinku

    Cosmically Powerful Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 940 posts

Posted 03 August 2017 - 10:32 PM

1 point of resistant cannot be reduced by armor piercing.

Hm

 

...because 0.5 rounds up to 1 and the defender gets the benefit of the rounding for defences, but it's still only one point. I think the issue here has a lot more to do with the GM approving a single point of resistant defence in the first place. Impose a minimum cost/rating on the munchins and move on. 

 

But if you're THAT desperate to bypass all resistant defences (presumably to do more STUN instead of one more BODY pip), there are ways and means if the GM allows it through AVLD/NND and defence drains/suppression instead of AP. But you're probably better throwing those points at increased STUN Multiple.

 

My bugbears have largely already been mentioned by others. I'd probably throw in the speed chart itself, despite not utterly hating it. I think it's long been one of the mechanics that drags things out too much for no great advantage. It was almost certainly designed to cater for super speed characters, but in the end it never really did that job anyway. The Flash or Quicksilver need more than a 6x speed increase over an average Joe, 3x or 4x better than trained mooks, and up to twice as fast as other supers. Which is why you actually have to build superspeed with powers.



#14 DasBroot

DasBroot

    Bat-Noogier

  • HERO Member
  • 1,212 posts

Posted 04 August 2017 - 11:43 AM

Character movement is counted per Phase rather than per Segment.  If the Move Through-er is SPD 5, that 60 meters per Phase comes out to 300 meters per Turn, approximately 56 mph.  60 meters per Segment comes out to 720 meters per Turn, approximately 135 mph.  If that same SPD 5 move-through-er had 144 meters of Running (720 meters per Turn, same as terminal velocity), that move through would then do 24d6 from velocity alone, a lot more comparable.  

 

 

A character with 12 speed and 60 running is also travelling at 'terminal velocity' ... but they still do str+10d6 on a move through.

 

That's the 'two cars hit you at 100 km/h' thing I referenced in an earlier post - the car with the lower SPD but same maximum velocity does more damage when it hits you by virtue of having to travel farther per Phase it moves.  

 

By your example the hero with 5 SPD has to move farther to match the true velocity of falling and therefore does (and takes) more damage (24d6)  than the hero with 12 SPD (10d6) who is moving just as 'fast' (720 m per turn).  He also takes a -14 ocv compared to the -6 ocv of the spd 12 character.

 

(The speed 5 character also reaches the door that his teammate just opened at the end of phase 4 130 meters away on Phase 5 first despite them both moving at the same per turn velocity.)

 

That just feels off to me on ALL accounts (OCV the least, in gut feel - he's moving in 60 meter bursts instead of 144 so maybe he has more control).

 

And in all cases falling that last 60 meters once you're at 60 m / segment (because you don't stop falling when it's not your phase) still trumps them both (30d6)


"I threw a rock at him!"

*silence*

".... it was a *big* rock."


#15 Hyper-Man

Hyper-Man

    Caped Madman!

  • HERO Member
  • 14,860 posts

Posted 04 August 2017 - 05:01 PM

A character with 12 speed and 60 running is also travelling at 'terminal velocity' ... but they still do str+10d6 on a move through.

 

That's the 'two cars hit you at 100 km/h' thing I referenced in an earlier post - the car with the lower SPD but same maximum velocity does more damage when it hits you by virtue of having to travel farther per Phase it moves.  

 

By your example the hero with 5 SPD has to move farther to match the true velocity of falling and therefore does (and takes) more damage (24d6)  than the hero with 12 SPD (10d6) who is moving just as 'fast' (720 m per turn).  He also takes a -14 ocv compared to the -6 ocv of the spd 12 character.

 

(The speed 5 character also reaches the door that his teammate just opened at the end of phase 4 130 meters away on Phase 5 first despite them both moving at the same per turn velocity.)

 

That just feels off to me on ALL accounts (OCV the least, in gut feel - he's moving in 60 meter bursts instead of 144 so maybe he has more control).

 

And in all cases falling that last 60 meters once you're at 60 m / segment (because you don't stop falling when it's not your phase) still trumps them both (30d6)

 

These issues are addressed in APG1 pages 178-179.  Basically, the Velocity Factor rules from 5e are re-introduced and Falling damage is considered to be equivalent to an Uncontrolled Move Through vs. the ground (meaning no Knockback is done so the character takes x2 damage) which is the main source of the seeming disparity with character vs. character Move Through damage.

 

VELOCITY DAMAGE TABLE
Action OCV DCV Damage/Effect
Falling +0 +0 (MASS + (VF)d6) x2
Grab By -3 -4 Move By and Grab object, +(VF)d6 to STR
Move By -2 -2 STR/2 + (VF)d6
Move Through -(VF) -3 STR + (VF)d6

 

:)

HM


  • DasBroot likes this

#16 Cantriped

Cantriped

    Heroic Magicat

  • HERO Member
  • 1,502 posts

Posted 04 August 2017 - 06:02 PM

I dislike that the rules for Falling and Knockback don't mesh with one another or the rules for Velocity-based Maneuvers. Most especially I dislike the fact that the Iconic Hero System Speedster's best tactic (Passing Strike and similar maneuvers) is actively punished by investing in Speed instead of Movement. All velocity-based game elements should be measuring Velocity based on the same formulae (like Velocity per Turn or Segment for example).

 

I dislike that you can have AVAD become a Limitation (I.E. the defense is more Common than before), yet per RAW such a power still has to take Does BODY (as a separate, prorated +1 advantage that eats up Active Points) regardless of the sum value of AVAD+Does BODY.

 

I dislike many of the rules regarding Adjustment Powers... Including the completely unnecessary 'halving' of Effect when positively Adjusting a Framework Slot (which made a lot more sense back when Elemental Controls were a thing).

 

I dislike the inconsistency between the rules for Foci, and those for Objects.

 

I like the mechanics of the combat system:

I like the way Maneuvers work, and I love the way Aborting and Holding Actions is set up. 

I like the Hit Location Tables, and fact that the other "optional combat rules" are part of the core toolkit.

 

I like that the modular 'code-like' nature of Power Construction allows me to create extremely complex combinations of mechanics in a very concise format that can be read without ambiguity by an experienced player/GM.



#17 dsatow

dsatow

    Bionic Occult Mutant Alien Samurai Hero

  • HERO Member
  • 947 posts

Posted 05 August 2017 - 04:05 AM

Back with find weakness, my defenses were usually 17 for low or 33 for high just for halving issues.  I don't seem to do that anymore in 6th.



#18 Brian Stanfield

Brian Stanfield

    Low-Powered Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 328 posts

Posted 05 August 2017 - 12:18 PM

Prone leaves one at 1/2 DCV regardless of range, even when common sense tells us that "hitting the dirt" to reduce one's silhouette should in fact increase one's DCV after a certain distance away.

#19 mrinku

mrinku

    Cosmically Powerful Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 940 posts

Posted 05 August 2017 - 02:00 PM

Well... it's actually a form of taking cover, so should usually penalise the shooter by -4 OCV for only seeing head and shoulders, if they can actually see that much (falling prone works best if there's something to hide behind when you do so). Of course, the unseen sniper looking down from the 6th floor may not have the problem...

 

Just realised this thread also asked for favourite quirks, and I'm a glass half full kinda guy, so here's mine:

 

Combat maneuvers. IMHO the heart and soul of HERO. Every choice has a purpose, which is what you want in a tactical game. 



#20 Nolgroth

Nolgroth

    Medium unnatural humanoid

  • HERO Member
  • 9,680 posts

Posted 05 August 2017 - 03:52 PM

Things I do not particularly care for;

  • Breakpoints at 13, 18, etc. I would have, long ago, wished Hero would have ditched the Char/5 and just made every point of Characteristic mean something.
  • Half dice for normal damage attacks. This is a direct artifact of the Breakpoints and drives me insane.
  • The Roll Low part of Skill rolls. I mean it's not horrific, but a Roll High system would have been more intuitive.
  • An underlying assumption that because I have a High Score in X, Therefore I am Y (I have a High Intelligence Score, Therefore I am Smart). I a toolkit game, I would think that the opposite were true (I bought a lot of Skills, etc to represent my Intelligence, Therefore I am Intelligent). Just purely a taste thing.

 

What I like about Hero is that all of those little complaints that I have are so easy to fix. I can just decide to divide all the stats by 5, thereby removing both the Breakpoints, eliminating half dice for Normal attacks, and making each point mean something. I can, easily, devise a Roll High system.  I can also choose to remove Characteristics (except combat and attrition stats like PD, ED, Body and Stun) and go to an entirely skills based system wherein the skills and powers you buy reflect your character. Believe me, I have imagined ways to push Hero so far that it hardly seems like Hero anymore. It merely retains the core dice rolling and damage mechanics. I have even conceived of how to replace Body and Stun with Shadowrun like Condition Monitors and a damage system that correlates. At some point it ceases to be Hero but that takes a lot of stretching.


  • Mister E, jdounis and mrinku like this