Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Name a RPG system you can't stand.


  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#1 Tech priest support

Tech priest support

    High Powered Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 479 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 04:18 AM

I really could not stand the system used in cthulhutech 1e. I think it was the framewerk (sic) system. It was d10 based but dividing our your roll was a task. You could go by highest single die, highest pair, triple, etc. You could go for a straight with several numbers in order and to make it worse you could roll a standard success or even a high success and a critical failure in the same roll!

What's your worse RPG system and why?
"You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views. Which can be very uncomfortable if you're one of the facts that needs altering." The Doctor.

#2 death tribble

death tribble

    Lolth's Pet Mischief Maker

  • HERO Member
  • 33,785 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 05:11 AM

Fuzion for Hero Games


  • Hermit and Hyper-Man like this

'We will Play Nice !' - The Society of Ben

The Tribble is angry, my friend, very angry.

People are strange when you're a Tribble, faces seem ugly when you're alone.

Dictator and President for Life of the Non Gaming Discussion Forums on Hero Games.


#3 Doc Democracy

Doc Democracy

    Freedom Fighter

  • HERO Member
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 05:50 AM

Heroes Unlimited. It definitely did not do what it said on the box - it was designed to be munchkinned as far as I can see and it also appeared to actively discriminate against those that did not use the 'good' powers....

"A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a sh**house wall
But before I die I'll add my regal scrawl
To show the world I'm left with sweet f*** all"
- Shane McGowan, Sea Shanty


#4 Nolgroth

Nolgroth

    Medium unnatural humanoid

  • HERO Member
  • 9,597 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 09:10 AM

System-wise, anything by Palladium. There was some interesting flavor stuff come out of that company, but their system sucked in a major sort of way.



#5 Burrito Boy

Burrito Boy

    Closet Chimichanga

  • HERO Member
  • 2,242 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 11:13 AM

Heroes Unlimited. It definitely did not do what it said on the box - it was designed to be munchkinned as far as I can see and it also appeared to actively discriminate against those that did not use the 'good' powers....


Damn. I love Heroes Unlimited. It's the first thing that ever got me interested in superheroes. I love the character types (alien, cyborg, robot, etc.), the powers, the skills, the character background table, the art...just about everything except the system. If you roll well, you can end up with an alien who can have powers from being an alien but also be a cyborg. But if you end up rolling a character who gets his powers from physical training, you get someone who can punch and kick really hard but has to give up several skills to be able to do so. I didn't have anybody to play the game with so I never had to worry about game balance but of all the characters I created with the book, not a single one of them was a Physical Training character. And several characters I created were made by picking what I wanted from the tables rather than rolling on them. (Which is probably why I fell in love with Hero when I discovered it.) So my enjoyment of Heroes Unlimited was undiluted by actually playing the game and its nostalgia factor is high for me. I can see its warts, though, so it's a love/hate relationship. As for a system that I just can't stand...I'll have to think about it.

RIP David Burton (1960-2011)


Kurt Wilcken's pulp web comic Hannibal Tesla


#6 GM Joe

GM Joe

    New Member

  • HERO Member
  • 715 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 11:34 AM

Any more I'm getting so I can't stand any system that uses anything other than standard D6's for randomization.


GMing since 1982.


#7 zslane

zslane

    The Monster From the Clock

  • HERO Member
  • 2,531 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 01:56 PM

GURPS.


  • aylwin13 likes this

#8 GM Joe

GM Joe

    New Member

  • HERO Member
  • 715 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 02:15 PM

Truthfully: I have gaming preferences, but no gaming hatreds. I can't think of a game that if my family or friends enjoyed it, I'd still walk away rather than play.


GMing since 1982.


#9 Pattern Ghost

Pattern Ghost

    Decuple Millennial Master

  • HERO Member
  • 12,503 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 03:43 PM

I didn't mind Heroes Unlimited, Revised. It, TMNT and the Robotech games were pretty playable, despite the rules oddities. The version they released after Rifts was super-munchkiny. Rifts was the most unbalanced mess I've ever seen, though the fluff was cool.


Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

 

This Week in MMOs

 


#10 IndianaJoe3

IndianaJoe3

    Mad Hero System Genius

  • HERO Member
  • 2,817 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 06:34 PM

I can't stand WoD, but I'm not sure if that's the system or the crapsack setting.



#11 Tech priest support

Tech priest support

    High Powered Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 479 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 07:11 PM

I also avoid d20. I don't like the d20 system at its base, a single d20 roll. It gives a flat as Kansas probability of results.

A multiple dice system, like 3d6, gives a probability curve that makes extreme results just as likely as midrange ones. I don't like it.
"You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views. Which can be very uncomfortable if you're one of the facts that needs altering." The Doctor.

#12 zslane

zslane

    The Monster From the Clock

  • HERO Member
  • 2,531 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 07:40 PM

So how should one characterize the value of a +1 modifier to a bell-curve probability function?

 

For instance, suppose your team is granted a +1 bonus to everyone's skill rolls on their next Phase. Due to circumstances (i.e., other modifiers) you have to try and make a 4- skill roll (it was 3- before that bonus). Are you the kind of person who sees that +1 and thinks, gee, all I get for that +1 is a crummy 1.4% increase to my chances of success, or are you the kind of person who thinks, woo hoo! my chances just quadrupled (went from 0.46% to 1.85%)?



#13 mrinku

mrinku

    Very High Powered Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 666 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 07:49 PM

Very few hates, but I've always been fairly selective with the ones I've played.

 

Was never a big fan of D&D, though I can't say I hate it, and a fair bit has been played. Like TPS I much prefer a bell curve... but then I started on Traveller and went to The Fantasy Trip well before I started playing D&D anyway. On the other hand, I do quite like the Chaoisum ones, even though they're percentage based (d20 for Pendragon). They're typically opposed percentage rolls (especially for combat), so sneakily do manage to impose a form of probability distribution into things. Pendragon is in my top three along with Champions and Traveller.

 

Palladium was no favourite, for more solid reasons of stupid design and sucking up good licenses that deserved better.

 

I can't quite bring myself to hate FUZION - it wasn't bad mechanically (but it wasn't Champions).



#14 Old Man

Old Man

    Youth and skill are no match for old age and treachery.

  • HERO Member
  • 42,003 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 08:24 PM

I'm going to call out Pathfinder specifically, a dizzying mess of Feats, classes, specializations, and subraces that somehow manages to avoid allowing you to make the character you want, or be realistic, balanced, or fun in any way.  It is by far the best of all d20 systems.

 

I'll also call out Earthdawn, the game where I literally couldn't figure out how to make a character.

 

Honorable mention to 1E/2E Shadowrun, a brilliant game hamstrung by an incomprehensibly bad system.  I had fun with it, but only by embracing my inner munchkin.


  • drunkonduty likes this
...and that's when the destruction began.

#15 Nolgroth

Nolgroth

    Medium unnatural humanoid

  • HERO Member
  • 9,597 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 08:34 PM

Fuzion was always a nice Hero lite to me. It wasn't Hero and should not have superseded Hero 5th edition, but I actually enjoyed Fuzion a lot. That's not meant to take away from anybody else's opinion. Just my own.

 

I so desperately want to find the Earthdawn that Old Man is referring to. Something of a "challenge accepted" response just pinged big time. Which version was that?



#16 sinanju

sinanju

    I like tacos

  • HERO Member
  • 3,508 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 09:41 PM

I can't stand WoD, but I'm not sure if that's the system or the crapsack setting.

 

I also hate the WoD system--but I *loooooove* the Mage background. The war for control of reality and the various differing systems of magic. It's great. But the system? Blows chunks.

 

Ditto for Feng Shui. I love that campaign setting for that game, probably even more than Mage. But for an "action movie roleplaying system" it's waaay too crunchy. I'd port the background over to some rules-lite system like Fudge or Wushu.


  • TrickstaPriest likes this
God is my co-pilot, but Satan is my door gunner!

Brock Samson: I'm gonna go outside and get some of that action.
Doctor Venture: Do you want to change first?
Brock Samson: Nah, I like wearing a tux when I'm killin' guys. It makes me feel like James Bond.

#17 Nolgroth

Nolgroth

    Medium unnatural humanoid

  • HERO Member
  • 9,597 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 10:03 PM

I also hate the WoD system--but I *loooooove* the Mage background. The war for control of reality and the various differing systems of magic. It's great. But the system? Blows chunks.

 

Ditto for Feng Shui. I love that campaign setting for that game, probably even more than Mage. But for an "action movie roleplaying system" it's waaay too crunchy. I'd port the background over to some rules-lite system like Fudge or Wushu.

 

Fudge Shui? :D



#18 mrinku

mrinku

    Very High Powered Superhero

  • HERO Member
  • 666 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 11:51 PM

Fuzion was always a nice Hero lite to me. It wasn't Hero and should not have superseded Hero 5th edition, but I actually enjoyed Fuzion a lot. That's not meant to take away from anybody else's opinion. Just my own.

 

Small correction. Fuzion fell between 4th and 5th edition, so it was 4th edition that it superceded.



#19 Nolgroth

Nolgroth

    Medium unnatural humanoid

  • HERO Member
  • 9,597 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 01:34 AM

Small correction. Fuzion fell between 4th and 5th edition, so it was 4th edition that it superceded.

 

Maybe it was intended to replace 4th edition but it superseded Hero 5th in the publication schedule. Everybody was waiting for Hero 5th and when Champions: TNM was announced and then that it was going to be a whole new rules set, there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth by those on the boards that were waiting patiently for 5th edition. The powers being divided up between three supplements didn't help sell it either. I remember much vitriol on the boards back then and moderation was virtually non-existent. I dub those Cybergames days the Time of Righteous Grumpiness. That made DoJ's acquisition of Hero Games and the subsequent focus on 5th Edition that much more miraculous to the people who felt cheated by the priority that Hero Games (under Bruce Harlick) gave to Fuzion and C:TNM.

 

Damn. That was late 90's. I had just gotten out of the Army and was transitioning back into civilian life.



#20 Ninja-Bear

Ninja-Bear

    Millennial Master

  • HERO Member
  • 3,801 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 04:52 AM

Time of Righteous Grumpiness! Rotf 🤣
The main object of the game is for the players and the GM to have fun. Champions 3rd ed. Pg 130