Jump to content

eyocum

HERO Member
  • Content Count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About eyocum

  • Rank
    Skilled Normal

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

527 profile views
  1. Potentially good news... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/us/north-carolina-gerrymander.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage "A panel of federal judges struck down North Carolina’s congressional map on Tuesday, condemning it as unconstitutional because Republicans had drawn the map seeking a political advantage. The ruling was the first time that a federal court had blocked a congressional map because of a partisan gerrymander, and it instantly endangered Republican seats in the coming elections." Balanced by potentially bad news... https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/09/rnc-ballot-security-consent-decree-328995 "After more than three decades, Republicans are free of a federal court consent decree that sharply limited the Republican National Committee's ability to challenge voters' qualifications and target the kind of fraud President Donald Trump has alleged affected the 2016 presidential race.
  2. So you're against self-aggrandizing individuals who make poor decisions about the people they surround themselves with, or the policies they promote? Just checking...
  3. Master List of Limitations View File This is a collection of the Hero Designer Prefabs of various Limitations created by Jack Butler in 5th Edition format. There is also a document file containing the entire contents of the prefabs. Submitter eyocum Submitted 12/29/2017 Category Prefabs Rules Version HERO System 5th Edition  
  4. Version 1.0.0

    124 downloads

    This is a collection of the Hero Designer Prefabs of various Limitations created by Jack Butler in 5th Edition format. There is also a document file containing the entire contents of the prefabs.
  5. Then you don't read the same liberal pundits or dissections of what wrong that I do. Shrug. You're entitled to ignore facts, but you should know what The New York Time, or The Washington Post at least, at saying in several different analysis and think pieces about where the party went wrong. That is reality, not Kenya or Benghazi nonsense, ignore it at your risk.
  6. And if they are found to be in violation of a lawful order, they will be fined and have to pay penalties. If the judge you're referring to is Roy Moore, that act of defiance cost him his job at the time, and the beliefs behinds that act cost him the recent election. If there's another case, please provide a fact checked citation. And it got him jailed and the ensuing presidential pardon doesn't provide relief form further legal actions (last I saw, anyway). And the entity has stopped all actions that lead to his arrest.
  7. Why don't you say bad things about Obama, for so totally mismanaging the Democratic Party during his tenure as President, that they lost so many elected positions and depth? Or about Hillary's blatant power grab (twice!)? Or the refusal of the party as a whole to take any appreciable stance on the reduction of the middle class and opportunity for Americans when they could have? At least be an equal opportunity anarchist...
  8. There is a difference between civil and institutional disobedience.
  9. Your solution to the problems caused by a president who calls into question just about every established norm of modern political life is to cause more problems, sow more dissent and strife, and actively rebel against lawful authority? Basically, do Trump stuff, just moreso? Just making sure I got you right.
  10. So... exactly how do you imagine this would look?
  11. Was this comment directed to Christopher's post? I can see that, if so. If it's to MSgtB's post, can you explain your thinking?
  12. Uh... That is *exactly* the same argument Moore's supporters made against his accusers. "Why didn't she say something when it happened?" Guess they're not so sloppy after all, if you're validating their argument by using it? Nobody here linked it to Moore, until you did. The rest of your paragraph is incorrect to facts, meandering, and misses the point (I think you're trying to make), about power and authority, and there relationship to abuse of women. Again, nobody here was talking about Moore until you brought it up, that she was a conservative, Trump supporter, etc. Um, the photographic evidence of Franken in the act, Franken's acknowledgement that the event happened and he did indeed do it.. Is that enough for you? Of course, we'll ignore the fact that her word that it happened should have been enough to start an inquiry; people would question her veracity...
  13. Too bad this photo has nothing to do with the photo you posted citing the photographer admitting to a fake (shown to be false). Still waiting for a proper cite to back up your claim. Nor does it stand in any way in support of your questioning her background and politics. Do you have any defense of yourself for your statements about her character, her politics, or motives? Just curious, since you're one of the first people on this board to go after the conservative media and people in general for doing exactly what you are in this case.
  14. Citation, please, or your original post does nothing to differentiate itself from the 'blame the victim' language that the people you despise are using vis the situation with Moore. Snopes by the way, says the the statement about the photo being faked is false (https://www.snopes.com/photographer-said-franken-image-was-staged/) If you have a verified correct cite, please share.
×
×
  • Create New...