Scott Ruggels Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 THe world of illustration has been roiled these past four months by the release of Dall-E, and Stable Diffusion since. Charges of art theft, due to the researchers scraping publiucally posted art, and photographs, up to 5 billion images, without regards to ownership, and getting to the point, that the text prompts can specify a certain artist's style, have generated protests on gallery sites and concept art boards, across the net. However, a court precedent has decided that only humans and human generated art can be protected. Therefore A.I. generated art, is automatically in the public domain. Pariah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 This will not be resolved until the 24th century when Commander Data is recognized as a sentient being. Ragitsu and DentArthurDent 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 I wish people would stop calling a computer program "Artificial Intelligence." It sounds all high tech and sexy but... its not, it really is not, Duke Bushido 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 Does this extend to text written by ChatGPT as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 I'm guessing it would, or that similar reasoning would apply, but I can't be bothered to watch youtube videos most of the time. Honestly for all the controversy around AI art, ChatGPT is far more interesting (and frightening). ChatGPT can write fiction. It can write essays. It can write news reports (factual, slanted, or otherwise). It can write code. It can write malware. It can write legislation. The ramifications with ChatGPT are far more serious than deepfakes and starving artists (which are quite serious in and of themselves). Scott Ruggels 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 9, 2023 Report Share Posted January 9, 2023 At work, I receive a lot of spam email with people offering to write articles for us. I wondered why that all started to appear about the same time. It hit me recently that's when people discovered ChatGPT. Old Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted January 15, 2023 Report Share Posted January 15, 2023 This Film Does Not Exist https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/01/13/opinion/jodorowsky-dune-ai-tron.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjalund Posted January 15, 2023 Report Share Posted January 15, 2023 So AI art may not be copyrightable but it might not take much manual neatening up to become copyrightable product Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hermit Posted January 15, 2023 Report Share Posted January 15, 2023 God bless that monkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 The matter's a bit far from settled at this point. It will be interesting to see how it shakes out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 The thing is, this is great because it means no matter what art someone puts out there, like this wonderful stuff... if its done by a computer, its open and free for EVERYBODY to use however they choose. Starlord, Grailknight and Pariah 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 52 minutes ago, Christopher R Taylor said: The thing is, this is great because it means no matter what art someone puts out there, like this wonderful stuff... if its done by a computer, its open and free for EVERYBODY to use however they choose. AIs apparently have a problem with the number of fingers to put on hands, and sometimes a problem with feet. If they add in lots of pouches, Liefeld may be out of a job. Scott Ruggels, Pattern Ghost, Christopher R Taylor and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 Do not give us hope…! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted January 16, 2023 Report Share Posted January 16, 2023 9 hours ago, Christopher R Taylor said: The thing is, this is great because it means no matter what art someone puts out there, like this wonderful stuff... if its done by a computer, its open and free for EVERYBODY to use however they choose. Those are excellent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 Nick Cave on ChatGPT https://www.theredhandfiles.com/chat-gpt-what-do-you-think/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkdguy Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 20 hours ago, Christopher R Taylor said: The thing is, this is great because it means no matter what art someone puts out there, like this wonderful stuff... if its done by a computer, its open and free for EVERYBODY to use however they choose. I understand the Siberian Tiger reference, but Russia should have been drawn as a bear, since that's the traditional representation. YMMV of course. Christopher R Taylor 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 Yeah I am not sure what the criteria or data that the program used to come up with these images. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 17, 2023 Report Share Posted January 17, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Ruggels Posted January 18, 2023 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2023 Welp the lawsuits are starting from the other direction:https://www.techspot.com/news/97276-artists-launch-copyright-lawsuit-against-ai-art-generators.html “Midjourney and Stable Diffusion are trained on billions of images. In the case of the latter, it uses selected datasets from the LAION-5B project, a collection of 5 billion images and associated descriptive captions created by a German-based research non-profit. The scraping is usually done without the artists’ consent and can be used to imitate their art style. Now, three artists—Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz—say this is a violation of several copyright laws.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted January 18, 2023 Report Share Posted January 18, 2023 This I can believe, "AI" uses other peoples' work to base their creations on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 18, 2023 Report Share Posted January 18, 2023 On 1/15/2023 at 8:12 PM, Christopher R Taylor said: The thing is, this is great because it means no matter what art someone puts out there, like this wonderful stuff... if its done by a computer, its open and free for EVERYBODY to use however they choose. Finland terrifies me the most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 18, 2023 Report Share Posted January 18, 2023 2 minutes ago, Pariah said: Finland terrifies me the most. Based on that art or just in general? assault 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 18, 2023 Report Share Posted January 18, 2023 Just now, Logan D. Hurricanes said: Based on that art or just in general? Naturally. assault 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Marcus Posted January 19, 2023 Report Share Posted January 19, 2023 13 hours ago, Pariah said: Naturally. Aw, they are sweethearts, really. Prickly, stabby sweethearts. Kinda like drunk porkupines. Pariah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted January 21, 2023 Report Share Posted January 21, 2023 I'm futzing around with ChatGPT this morning and it is solving basic physics word problems. And showing its work. Its only problem appears to be a lack of control over significant digits. Now would be a great time to retire from an academic career in the hard sciences. Steve 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.