Jump to content

Longest Running Thread EVER


Recommended Posts

About six inches of snow on the ground in my end of Seattle, still lightly snowing off and on.  And my bird feeder is insanely busy.  The varied thrush showed up today for the first time this winter.  All the other regulars in higher-than-usual numbers., from flickers and jays down to chickadees, bushtits and wrens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The funniest thing about this is the reaction of the 18-month-old cat.  We had no heavy snow last winter, and she was too small to be introduced to it anyway, so she'd never seen snow before.  Last summer we started letting her out in the yard.  When I opened the door for her (and the older cats, neither of whom wanted out in it, but they had seen it before) this afternoon, her reaction to six inches of snow on the deck was something like shocked, horrified fascination, not daring to step out into it, craning her neck to see as much of the disfigured landscape as she could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've got snow sticking to the roads for the first time this season.

 

In other news, the latest water report shows that the area's snowpack this winter is 62% of average, and last month was the 7th driest January on record for the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cancer said:

 

How about the law of non contradiction which Stanford's online encyclopedia defines as: "

It is impossible that the same thing can at the same time both belong and not belong to the same object and in the same respect, and all other specifications that might be made, let them be added to meet local objections (1005b19–23).

ps: I'm genuinely curious. And thanks for the link, never heard of that before. I can see its applicability with a set of 1, however am also curious to your response to LNC. 

 

 

4 hours ago, Pariah said:

 

This works just fine if (not x) = 0.

 

/literal

/pedantic 


THat's just it, as we are talking about existing things. Can an existing thing essentially be its opposite? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'd heard of Russell's paradox, but I've never worked with it; I have no training in working with formal logic, mathematical or otherwise.  It interacts with Gödel's incompleteness theorems in possibly relevant ways.  What a Real Mathematician would say in response ... I have no idea what they'd say.

 

The non-contradiction law seems like an axiom to me, but the others are theorems, and Godel's work indicates that a set of axioms from which theorems are constructed must be either incomplete (i.e., there exist true things which cannot be proven) or inconsistent (i.e., there exist false things that nevertheless be proven true).  (I assume it is possible for both to hold.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...