Jump to content

More space news!


tkdguy

Recommended Posts

On ‎12‎/‎26‎/‎2018 at 4:38 AM, Christopher said:

Ultima Thule - an object New Horizon will pass by around New Year - is giving us it's first mystery.

 

We have already determined that it is not a sphere.

So we have been looking at it to figure out what light-curve it emits, to have more ideas in wich way it was not a sphere.

But there is no light curve. The light reflection is constants, as if it was a sphere.

 

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-Article.php?page=20181220

 

Every time a probe visits a new celestial object, we find something that makes scientists say, "WTF? We didn't expect that. And there's another batch of theories thrown into the Dumpster." (All said with big grins and occasional mad giggles.)

 

I would be surprised if Ultima Thule did not continue the tradition.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, DShomshak said:

 

Every time a probe visits a new celestial object, we find something that makes scientists say, "WTF? We didn't expect that. And there's another batch of theories thrown into the Dumpster." (All said with big grins and occasional mad giggles.)

 

I would be surprised if Ultima Thule did not continue the tradition. 

 

Dean Shomshak

The flyby will happen at 31st December/1st January. And we will have a high resolution image on earth about 1 day later. Currently taking a look at the twitter feeds:

https://twitter.com/nasanewhorizons
https://twitter.com/JHUAPL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Cancer said:

They seem to have reacquired the carrier frequency 15-20 minutes back, so the spacecraft survived close approach.

 

Cool pics will take longer.

That is the last image we got before the flyby happened:
aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kv

 

We are not even certain if it is shaped like a bowling pin, or just two seperate objects in close orbit with each other from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't really news; I just hadn't heard this point until today's meeting, in one of the prize lectures.

 

The neutron star - neutron star merger 18 months ago that was seen in gravitational waves, and in gamma rays, and then in other wavelengths  of electromagnetic waves, proves that the speed of light and the speed of gravitational waves are the same, to within one part in a quadrillion.  This absolutely rules out MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics, a theory that tweaks the law of gravitation as a way to explain the rotation curves of galaxies and some other observed astrophysical velocities without resorting to dark matter) and some other alternative theories of gravity, because one piece of these is that gravity and electromagnetism don't necessarily propagate at the same speed (something which is absolutely required in general relativity).  That limit of one part in a quadrillion comes from the difference in arrival times between the gravitational wave signal and the gamma-ray signal, a bit less than 2 seconds; that difference is a about a quadrillionth of the light travel time from the merging neutron stars to Earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back when physicists were in a tizzy over experiments that seemed to show neutrinos might travel faster than light, a letter to Science News made a similar point based on the near-simultaneous arrival of light and neutrinos from Supernova 1987A. Given the supposed discrepancy measured by the Italian experimenters, the neutrinos would have been detected some hours before the light. No such difference; therefore, the experimenters were in error. (And sure enough, the source of the error was figured out a few weeks later.)

 

I appreciate the Universe producing such natural experiments. They are excellent rebukes to the idiots who insist that "Oh, scientists just make it all up."

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, DShomshak said:

Back when physicists were in a tizzy over experiments that seemed to show neutrinos might travel faster than light, a letter to Science News made a similar point based on the near-simultaneous arrival of light and neutrinos from Supernova 1987A. Given the supposed discrepancy measured by the Italian experimenters, the neutrinos would have been detected some hours before the light. No such difference; therefore, the experimenters were in error. (And sure enough, the source of the error was figured out a few weeks later.)

 

I appreciate the Universe producing such natural experiments. They are excellent rebukes to the idiots who insist that "Oh, scientists just make it all up."

 

Dean Shomshak

But...they Do make it up! They just make it up using facts....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...