Jump to content

Order of the Stick


Rapier

Recommended Posts

Re: Order of the Stick

 

That's something that Ozymandias and Dr. Manhattan apparently forgot. :rolleyes:

 

That's what's called "deconstructionism." Which ironically, is the case here. If Watchmen was about blowing up superhero tropes (like the idea that you don't compromise with the mastermind and let him win) Order of the Stick blows up Fantasy tropes like the idea that monsters are just monsters without motivation. Sure the dragons are Evil and must be killed, but that doesn't mean they don't have cause to feel justified in revenge. ;)

 

JG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

That's something that Ozymandias and Dr. Manhattan apparently forgot. :rolleyes:

 

That's what's called "deconstructionism." Which ironically' date=' is the case here. If [i']Watchmen[/i] was about blowing up superhero tropes (like the idea that you don't compromise with the mastermind and let him win) Order of the Stick blows up Fantasy tropes like the idea that monsters are just monsters without motivation. Sure the dragons are Evil and must be killed, but that doesn't mean they don't have cause to feel justified in revenge. ;)

 

I can't add much to James' comment. Watchment deliberately flew in the face of established Super tropes, and started a new subgenre in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Hey I don't know whether this has already posted, but I think Vaarsuvias' gneder has just been revealed:

yxzBsnUXU3LExu3Xie4.gif

Notice the demon said, "I think he said..." And this is one of the few people who would know. Thus this is probably an admission.

 

If anyone has an activated account on Giant in the Playground, could you redirect them to this post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Hey I don't know whether this has already posted, but I think Vaarsuvias' gneder has just been revealed:

yxzBsnUXU3LExu3Xie4.gif

Notice the demon said, "I think he said..." And this is one of the few people who would know. Thus this is probably an admission.

 

If anyone has an activated account on Giant in the Playground, could you redirect them to this post?

 

Or the demon could've just been using standard English. "He" does double duty in the English language. It is both the male pronoun and the proper pronoun to use when you are referring to a person whose gender is unknown. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

I think it's a pretty standard trope of heroic fiction that we DON'T sacrifice a few to save a multitude. We save who we can today and rely on prevailing over the new evils tomorrow.

 

I agree, but that doesn´t mean it´s the only trope or even a good [or best] one.

 

How about the person who permits his friends to die when he could easily save them, and instead chooses to help many more complete strangers survive? That could easily be argued as a heroic, if tragic action. Rather than choose himself, he chose others, at a great price.

 

Really, it can easily be argued that what you described is irresponsible. What if you´re the last one who can reasonably stop this evil? Hoping for the best isn´t exactly a good justification for what ends up happening.

 

Personally, I like both. It just depends on the story you want to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

I agree' date=' but that doesn´t mean it´s the only trope or even a good [or best'] one.

 

How about the person who permits his friends to die when he could easily save them, and instead chooses to help many more complete strangers survive? That could easily be argued as a heroic, if tragic action. Rather than choose himself, he chose others, at a great price.

 

Really, it can easily be argued that what you described is irresponsible. What if you´re the last one who can reasonably stop this evil? Hoping for the best isn´t exactly a good justification for what ends up happening.

 

Personally, I like both. It just depends on the story you want to tell.

 

Very true. The corollary to "we don't make sacrifices like that" is that the Heroes don't fail due to their refusal to make sacrifices like that. The two go hand in hand, and the players and GM need to be on common ground as to what game they're playing.

 

Much like "Why don't my players act more like Superheroes?" is often properly answered "Because the rest of your world punishes them if they do."

 

The simple trope that there is always some way to succeed (Supers), or that your adversaries advance in power at more or less the same rate you do (pretty much all Fantasy games), if removed, completely change the ground rules.

 

I recall reading an article, many years back, on a Star Trek game, discussing some of the tropes. For example, it referred to the complete lack of hesitation Captain Kirk would have in swapping himself for a hostage crewmember. But it then followed this up with a discussion of the corollary - no matter how hopeless the situation Kirk was then in, there was ALWAYS a way out. The Captain never blasted in with the full fury of a starship. But when the chips were down and things were at their darkest "Phasers, Cap'n? Ye've got 'em! I managed to restore one bank!" If you want more realistic sci fi, you need to accept that the characters will behave more pragmatically, based on how their world works.

 

"Let the dice fall where they may" creates a very different playstyle than "Never let the dice interfere with the story."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Sure it does. The problem with vigilantism (directed at actual wrongdoers) is that it disrupts the social order and thereby makes us all less safe in the long run. If there is no social order to disrupt' date=' then that's not an issue.[/quote']

 

How very Lord Of The Flies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Which brings up the question of just how responsible we are for acts committed in altered states, regardless of cause.

If we're just as responsible as we would be in our default state, then V is responsible for something pretty seriously Evil by non-D&D standards, or even D&D standards if even one of those targets wasn't Evil (likely considering the number of dragons killed and the allignment rules last time I checked).

 

On the plus side, even considering her current effective level, if she gets to keep any of the XP from that mass kill, she's probably due for a couple of Level Ups. :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Yeah. That's. Wow.

 

That's going to affect the ecosystem...

 

My first thought was

 

How many XP was casting that worth?

 

 

The second thought was that V is, if not entirely turned to the dark side, certainly getting fitted for a black cloak and trying out different Sith names.

 

Darth Suvie does have kind of a ring to it, doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Which brings up the question of just how responsible we are for acts committed in altered states, regardless of cause.

If we're just as responsible as we would be in our default state, then V is responsible for something pretty seriously Evil by non-D&D standards, or even D&D standards if even one of those targets wasn't Evil (likely considering the number of dragons killed and the allignment rules last time I checked).

 

On the plus side, even considering her current effective level, if she gets to keep any of the XP from that mass kill, she's probably due for a couple of Level Ups. :D

 

Taking this one step further, I believe some judicial systems differentiate between a state entered voluntarily and one entered involuntarily. For example, I choose to get liquored up and, while blind drunk, decide it would be cool to fire off a shotgun into the back alley behind my house. I chose to get drunk, so I'm responsible. If my mental functions were instead impaired by, say, a high fever due to illness, or carbon monoxide poison, I'm not responsible since I didn't choose to enter that altered state.

 

V chose the splicing, so would be responsible under that logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Taking this one step further, I believe some judicial systems differentiate between a state entered voluntarily and one entered involuntarily. For example, I choose to get liquored up and, while blind drunk, decide it would be cool to fire off a shotgun into the back alley behind my house. I chose to get drunk, so I'm responsible. If my mental functions were instead impaired by, say, a high fever due to illness, or carbon monoxide poison, I'm not responsible since I didn't choose to enter that altered state.

 

V chose the splicing, so would be responsible under that logic.

 

Yeah. I was thinking down a similar line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Just a counterpoint, as much as I would deplore such an act in the real world or anything resembling it, in a world where dragons are Color Coded For Your Convenience and some colors are Always Chaotic Evil, in an objective and verifiable sense, then wouldn't ridding the world of a large number of such dragons be a Good-aligned act?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...