Jump to content

Weapons and armor discussion


Toadmaster

Recommended Posts

On the old board I started the axes vs maces thread which eventually grew to include a lot of good ideas for handling weapons. Since the old boards are not available at least for now and since Conquest and the impending arrival of FH later this year has the fantasy weapons lobe of my brain going into overtime I thought I'd try to get people to share their ideas on giving weapons and armor more personality. Anything weapons and armor is fair game, good books, TV series, movies etc, individual opinions, Use of UMA for martial maneuvers, ideas for building weapons, armor etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that i've always done is throw most standard weapons out for my FH campaigns.....

 

I then create Society appropiate weapons for the cultues...

 

Somethings will stay.... basics like certain sword, axes, hammers, ect. But most others are repackaged with small changes to fit cultures...

 

Take a Quarter Staff for example....

 

In one culture it has evolved into a hidden weapon.

 

the staff is hollowed out at 2 parts to allow a sword and a spear to fit inside the staff. If necessary, the stall can be broken up into a spear (1 piece drops to the ground) or a spear and a sword (roughly the size of 2 shory swords) and used for 2 Handed Fighting. The spear end becomes a Parrying weapon (+1 DCV) while the sword the major strike weapon... when battle is over, the weapons twist (groves in the wood) back together to reform the staff....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Toadmaster

Special features of general classes of weapons

Axes, +1DC

Swords, +1 OCV

Maces / hammers, Penetrating

Picks, AP

Hooked weapons, may use grab manuever only to pull an opponent off a horse or off balance.

 

We need to give maces some distinction too. I thought about giving them reduced pen, but that would make them useless. So is the +1 stun mult that usually goes to the hammers.

 

Maybe some kind of permanent plate armor/shield damage? That's my understanding of how they were used. Say each hit with a mace takes off X DEF from the armor, where X is equal to the amount of 'normal BODY' rolled on the dice? So if I'm swinging for 2d6K on average I'd take 2 DEF off your platemail when I hit, in addition to any damage I happen to do to you.

 

The biggest problem I see is that this drops sharply in effectiveness if hit locations are in use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, one way to make weapons more distinctive would be to start with the armor. Define each type of armor as belonging to one (or more) of the following sets; Cloth, Leather, Mail, Wood, and Plate. Then you can give weapons properties vs. specific types of armors.

 

For example, Banded armor may be considered both Leather and Plate. Forest Elven (or some Oriental) armor might be Wood and Cloth.

 

Arrows and Spears might be AP vs. Mail, and RedPen vs. Wood.

Hammers/Maces might be Penetrating vs. Cloth/Leather/Mail, and +1 Stun vs. Plate.

Swords might be AP vs. Cloth, RedPen vs. Plate, and +1 Stun vs. Leather and Mail.

 

Alternatively (or additionaly), you could break weapons down into the types of damage they can do (piercing, slashing, crushing, hacking, etc.). Then you can replace the "Strike" combat maneuver with a freebie one for each type of damage, and apply the mods that way... which supports creating odd/exotic weapons better.

A Polearm might be able to pierce and slash, the Lirpa (Vulcan weapon from Star Trek TOS) could Crush and Slash, and a rapier might only be able to Pierce effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Victor

Alternatively (or additionaly), you could break weapons down into the types of damage they can do (piercing, slashing, crushing, hacking, etc.). Then you can replace the "Strike" combat maneuver with a freebie one for each type of damage, and apply the mods that way... which supports creating odd/exotic weapons better.

A Polearm might be able to pierce and slash, the Lirpa (Vulcan weapon from Star Trek TOS) could Crush and Slash, and a rapier might only be able to Pierce effectively.

 

Isn't that GURPS? It's a good idea, but I don't see an elegant way to retrofit that onto the existing system. HERO is just a bit more abstracted than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pierce/Slash/Crush

 

Here is the kernal of a suggestion for implimenting a Piercing, Slashing, and Crushing damage system.

 

I was thinking, there is already a distinction between physical and energy damage, and between normal and killing damage.

When you buy an armor power you are already ratioing the point between PD and ED, so why not add Piercing, Slashing, and Crushing Defense too.

Then when you buy armor you establish a ratio between Piercing, Slashing, Crushing, and Energy Defenses.

 

Doing the same thing for weapons is a little more difficult. Maybe the best would be to say that when you buy a killing attack you must define what type of damage it does. Piercing, etc... For a weapon that can do two types of damage, then you could construct a multipower for it, or you could ratio the points of you killing attack just like armor, or you could make an on the spot decision as the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Storn

I think that leather armor, against any kind of killing attack becomes DMG reduction..allowing full PD vs. the Stun, but not adding any of itself.

 

Just my 2 cents.

 

Interesting idea. But how much Damage Reduction do you get?

 

Do other types of armor provide as much or more Damage Reduction? or do they just provide Defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, Dmg Resist, not Reduce... sorry.

 

I think 2 PD Dmg Resist would be fine, except vs. Stun, you would actually add the 2 to your natural PD for purposes of Stun only.

 

Leather can prevent you from getting killed, or a sword/arrow thrust from going through you, but that is all it does. There isn't much force absorbtion there.

 

Padded under chain is a bit different. IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were talking about a heavy leather coat, Storn, I might agree with you but leather armour is normally both much, much thicker and also padded. We know from historical accounts that both leather and cotton armour were cappable of stopping arrows.

 

So I'm happy with 2 DEF.

 

Cheers, Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread, the armor and shield threads have me reading again, in fact Museum Replicas Limited catalog #74 arrived in the mail. Neat stuff and generally a great reference but over priced. Most items can be found at ½ to 1/3 the price. I will say this every thing of MRL that I have handled is what they advertise.

 

Now one thing that must be said if you talk weapons you need to talk armor and technology. This is real important in a game. Example as plate armor is introduced in Europe (1435) swords get longer and thinner to get in the gaps. Two-handed swords and other weapons show up seeking to defeat this new armor. In Europe as new weapons or use of them (tactics) are introduced they spread quickly. Now changes in the ancient world seem not to move quickly to other cultures or states.

Now Plate has been introduced before. The Greeks in 1500bc developed a bronze banded plate and by 800bc what is called classical full bronze plate (called Muscle plate). This coupled with the heavy bronze shield made the Greek infantry when it met the Persians in 480 bc unstoppable.

What meaning is this to fantasy gaming. I do not know J. I have run 10 fantasy games in twenty years and they have generally been historically based at least in weapon development. Now I have been in games that there seemed to be no tech thought per say. These games have been some of the best. Each game master has his own style.

Now I am getting together a list of swords and such to compare them and show how I used them in my games, which seem to work well.

 

Note on European Plate.

First suit built as a test in Mainz Germany each smith in town is given one piece to do. When the suit is assembled it cost so much 10,000 silver marks that the only thing they can think to do is give it to the King of Spain and Austrian Charles the IV who promptly orders 4 suit for himself. I assume at a greatly reduced price. Next year at a siege in Spain Charles rides up in his new plate suit to a group of Dukes who remark on what a great thing it is and promptly order suits for them selves. Now Mainz leads armor making for years. Now by 1480’s the condettori in Italy are all armed with plate and by 1540 when the united Spanish and Venice fleets fight at Lepento with the Turks every soldier (15,000) had Plate. The Turks really felt this was unfair since they were using reinforced chain. The bow vs. gun being anther issue.

 

Just think the game master says to you. Smith the mayor and the town council are here.

Mayor: young smith the council has decide that this new suit of armor, weapon or magic thing need to be taken to the richest most powerful king in the world. We have decided to send you since this will be a dangerous……J The adventure begins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...