Jump to content

Adventure Seed/Hook --- Magnetic Field Failure And Extinction


clsage

Recommended Posts

Re: Adventure Seed/Hook --- Magnetic Field Failure And Extinction

 

Disrupting the Earth's magnetic field lets in more cosmic radiation? Sounds like a plan by Magneto to induce more mutations. Which' date=' of course, gets out of his control and threatens all life on Earth.[/quote']

 

Or something out of the second novel in the Eugenics Wars series....if my memory serves rightly. Kahn Singh's doomsday weapon to disrupt the ozone..... :D

 

-Carl-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Adventure Seed/Hook --- Magnetic Field Failure And Extinction

 

'The Chilling Stars - A Cosmic Vierw Of Climate Change' by Henrik Svensmark and Nigel Calder. A very logical work postulating that a major (and mostly overlooked) factor in the Earth's climate (including ice ages and warm-ups) are the interactions between the Sun's magnetic field and certain forms of extra-solar (cosmic) radiation.

 

Basically, cosmic rays (specifically muons) help stimulate the formation of low-level cloud on Earth by helping produce the particles necessary for nucleation (the tiny things that water needs to condense on in order to form clouds). When the Sun is particularly active (as happened in the 1990s), its magnetic field (which extends past Pluto) strengthens and fewer cosmic rays get through, meaning less cloud cover and therefore warmer, drier conditions. When the Sun gets "lazy", more cosmic rays get through and more cloud cover results. This, plus the background levels of cosmic radiation (which can vary according to local stellar conditions and the Sun's current position in the Galaxy) is a major influence in climate variation.

 

Incidentally, the Earth's own magnetic field is seen as only a minor factor - at least as regards this particular process.

 

Understand that I cannot do the book's line of reasoning full justice here but, as presented , it makes a lot of sense. The book also mentions some of the extraordinarily dogmatic opposition the theory has gotten from the proponents of CO2-based Global Warming (which the authors regard as a fallacy, based on skewed results).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...