Iuz the Evil Posted May 8, 2017 Report Share Posted May 8, 2017 Just recycling props. Although I mean killing everyone and wishing them back has happened in the Avengers several times in the past with Korvac or the Cosmic Cube. Happened in the Secret Wars too I think And the Infinity Gauntlet did just that, along with half of all life in the universe in the comics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hermit Posted May 8, 2017 Report Share Posted May 8, 2017 Natalie Portman has done somethings I like, but I get the 'phoning it in' vibe for her Marvel work mostly Pattern Ghost and Christopher R Taylor 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted May 8, 2017 Report Share Posted May 8, 2017 I agree, she really doesn't seem to care about the role or the movies. I've read she does not like the Jane Foster character at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted May 8, 2017 Report Share Posted May 8, 2017 I wonder why she'd have taken the role then. It's not like she needed the money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zslane Posted May 8, 2017 Report Share Posted May 8, 2017 Needing the money is irrelevant when you're offered millions. Every million counts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted May 9, 2017 Report Share Posted May 9, 2017 I think she might like the character more if they'd kept her closer to the comics or even one of the animated versions instead of generic female 'lead' #13-B. Especially with the current things they're doing with her in the comics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Shadow Posted May 9, 2017 Report Share Posted May 9, 2017 I think I read somewhere that she accepted the role because she wanted to work with Ken Branagh. Old Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted May 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2017 I think I read somewhere that she accepted the role because she wanted to work with Ken Branagh. I vaguely remember something like that as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted May 15, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2017 Joss Whedon's Astonishing, Spine-Tingling, Soul-Crushing Marvel Adventure! https://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/joss-whedon-spine-tingling-soul-crushing-marvel-adventure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt the Bruins Posted May 15, 2017 Report Share Posted May 15, 2017 I agree, she really doesn't seem to care about the role or the movies. I've read she does not like the Jane Foster character at all. Well, there's one thing she and I can agree on. Christopher R Taylor 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted May 15, 2017 Report Share Posted May 15, 2017 Yeah I thought both her and the dimwitted girl's roles were pretty expendable and pointless. Not great writing from an otherwise usually great job by the Marvel team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt the Bruins Posted May 17, 2017 Report Share Posted May 17, 2017 For me Dennings' character/performance was less pointless and more actively horrible and detracting from the movies. Jane was merely blah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted May 17, 2017 Report Share Posted May 17, 2017 I liked her in the first movie. There was just enough of it. They way overdid it in the second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zslane Posted May 17, 2017 Report Share Posted May 17, 2017 Dennings was annoying, but not Jar Jar annoying. Just saying. Christopher R Taylor 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted May 18, 2017 Report Share Posted May 18, 2017 Yeah she was tolerable, just not part of the movie, like someone from Friends had been transposed into the film, CGI'd in with bad lighting and lines that made no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted May 18, 2017 Report Share Posted May 18, 2017 That's pretty much how I felt about Jane Foster's whole crew, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted May 21, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2017 Mantis Co-Creator ‘Not Happy’ With Character’s Portrayal in Guardians 2 http://www.cbr.com/mantis-steve-englehart-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2/ Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 Turned Mantis Into the Butt of a Joke http://www.cbr.com/guardians-galaxy-vol-2-mantis-joke/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Neilson Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 One advantage Marvel has over DC is that most of their characters are relative unknowns in mainstream culture. They can effectively be reinvented for the movies. Make Superman a genetic experiment, rather than the last son of a dead planet, and watch the screaming begin. Make Starlord's Dad Ego the Living Planet instead of J-Son of Spartax and who makes a fuss? A lot of the MCU characters feel more like "inspired by the comic character" than transitioning that character to another medium. That's helped along by Marvel already having variants on many characters (Ultimate Universe versus mainstream Marvel is a big one). Hawkeye isn't a wisecracker in the MCU - that role is filled by RDJ's Iron Man. The Vision is a very different character, we lost much of the Scarlet Witch's history and Hank Pym's backstory is radically altered. But it is interesting that the stereotypical Mandarin had to go, while Mantis is replaced with a stereotype geisha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher R Taylor Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 I wasn't fond of the remake of Vision's origin but the character ended up pretty much the same. Their reenvisioning of scarlet witch wasn't very interesting but I do like that Pym isn't a wife beating unstable jerk. It made for an interesting comic but I like Pym better this way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 One advantage Marvel has over DC is that most of their characters are relative unknowns in mainstream culture. They can effectively be reinvented for the movies. Make Superman a genetic experiment, rather than the last son of a dead planet, and watch the screaming begin. Make Starlord's Dad Ego the Living Planet instead of J-Son of Spartax and who makes a fuss? A lot of the MCU characters feel more like "inspired by the comic character" than transitioning that character to another medium. That's helped along by Marvel already having variants on many characters (Ultimate Universe versus mainstream Marvel is a big one). Hawkeye isn't a wisecracker in the MCU - that role is filled by RDJ's Iron Man. The Vision is a very different character, we lost much of the Scarlet Witch's history and Hank Pym's backstory is radically altered. But it is interesting that the stereotypical Mandarin had to go, while Mantis is replaced with a stereotype geisha. I wasn't aware the geisha stereotype included psychic powers. At any rate given that Mantis' previous roles included blatant fanservice, knowing martial arts simply because she happens to be Asian and having to get knocked up for the good of the universe (or however that Celestial Madonna storyline worked out, I know it involved her needing to have a baby though) I'm thinking this version of the character is superior. She certainly has a better costume then the original. drunkonduty 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjalund Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 and having to get knocked up for the good of the universe It's tilll possible she could be having Ego's baby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 It's tilll possible she could be having Ego's baby I suppose, though she clearly wasn't pregnant when we saw her. Also I think she'd have mentioned if Ego was doing her, given that keeping secrets did not seem to be her forte. At any rate I still think movie Mantis is better then comic Mantis, for the reasons I've already stated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted May 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 Mantis like is German-Vietnamese and received her martial arts training via the Priests of Pama a Kree group.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 Mantis like is German-Vietnamese and received her martial arts training via the Priests of Pama. Moondragon also received her martial arts training from the Priests of Pama. So, instead of Mantis being a stereotypical Asian war bride in the comics, her mother is. Not much different than what the article is accusing the movie of, just off by a generation and the movie only implies the connection if you squint your eyes and look at it sideways. As for the martial arts: She's still of Asian descent and still knows martial arts, regardless of who trained her. Comics version is actually half Asian by the story. Movie Mantis doesn't know martial arts and is an alien, so movie version wins there. Really, the comic version of the character is rife with bad stereotypes and fan service. It's not like the original is some form of high art that's being besmirched by the movie version. Twilight, pinecone, drunkonduty and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Neilson Posted May 22, 2017 Report Share Posted May 22, 2017 This is the advantage of the MCU, to me - they can re-envision the characters and only the fanboys know. The movies have worked in large part because they did not enslave themselves to 50+ years of backstory. However, the movie Mantis was a shrinking violet submissive, KOd so she could be rescued by the dumb jock - also a stereotype, but since it's a male stereotype with no ethnic connotations, it's not one anyone complains about. Matt the Bruins 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.