Jump to content

Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 933
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The central concept of having "heroes" and "villains" in the first place might be part of the argument. If there are good guys, then they're always going to win because that's how we're raised to expect movies to work. One of the problems is that we come to expect life to work out that way as well, and become cynical and over-detached when we find out it doesn't. How do you live your life when you conclude the only thing good intentions will ever get you is a well-paved road to Hell?

 

In Miracleman and Watchmen, Alan Moore carried that cynicism to its logical extreme. Heroism is a lie. Those who truly believe in it are foolish or mad. All giving people power will do is give those people opportunities to muck up the world, by design or accident. Power does more than corrupt -- Power is Corruption. Even the greatest of heroes was not immune: in "Whatever Happened to Superman?", Moore portrayed every good deed Superman had ever done in his entire life being unraveled and made pointless. In the end his only choices were to break his most sacred taboo and then obliterate his powers permanently and become an ordinary mortal to live out his life. He finally concluded that "Superman was overrated".

 

Now I am the last person who would want to see a Superman movie that dark, nor am I the sort of person who wants to be so cynical that even good becomes evil. But that doesn't indicate people should be thinking in four colors either. Superpowers drive stories -- the question is what sort of story you want to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The central concept of having "heroes" and "villains" in the first place might be part of the argument. If there are good guys, then they're always going to win because that's how we're raised to expect movies to work. One of the problems is that we come to expect life to work out that way as well, and become cynical and over-detached when we find out it doesn't. How do you live your life when you conclude the only thing good intentions will ever get you is a well-paved road to Hell?

 

In Miracleman and Watchmen, Alan Moore carried that cynicism to its logical extreme. Heroism is a lie. Those who truly believe in it are foolish or mad. All giving people power will do is give those people opportunities to muck up the world, by design or accident. Power does more than corrupt -- Power is Corruption. Even the greatest of heroes was not immune: in "Whatever Happened to Superman?", Moore portrayed every good deed Superman had ever done in his entire life being unraveled and made pointless. In the end his only choices were to break his most sacred taboo and then obliterate his powers permanently and become an ordinary mortal to live out his life. He finally concluded that "Superman was overrated".

 

Now I am the last person who would want to see a Superman movie that dark, nor am I the sort of person who wants to be so cynical that even good becomes evil. But that doesn't indicate people should be thinking in four colors either. Superpowers drive stories -- the question is what sort of story you want to tell.

Except that in that instance, he didn't really break it.  He was trying to banish Mxy to the Phantom Zone and it was Mxy's own attempt to escape back to the 5th Dimension that resulted in his death.  Superman still blamed himself but strictly speaking, he didn't kill Mxy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is probably the reason Superman  is beloved in American popular culture. He is the man who has devoted his life to showing that there are times when Lord Acton was wrong. At least in the classical view of the character, he probably could conquer the planet any time he wanted to. And do a better job of running it than most of the people doing it now. But he doesn't, even though he's had people on their knees begging him to lead them to glory, because he genuinely believes that human beings should be free to make their own decisions. One of the late pre-Crisis stories featured Superman waking from one of a series of nightmares about nuclear war (he dreamed he was the only person who survived a nuclear attack on Metropolis) and exploring in his mind the ways he could use his powers to take away man's deadly toys before deciding that trying to control that meant he couldn't do all the little acts of kindness and individual rescues that meant so much to him. Superman enjoys doing things like saving the window washer whose scaffolding is about to collapse. And he also enjoys helping the world get better through journalism and writing -- Clark Kent may be "mild-mannered", but he's not going to back down in the face of injustice.

 

Batman doesn't hate injustice so much as he hates crime. He isn't nearly as offended by homelessness and poverty as he is by thieves and thugs. Bruce Wayne is a philanthropist who does a lot of public charity work -- but then so is Lex Luthor. His heart may be in it a little more than Lex's is, but for him it's part of the disguise.

 

That';s the fundamental difference between then that is completely lost on Snyder. Superman loves Justice, and Batman craves Revenge. Is it not for nothing that the classic Animated Series for Batman takes place mostly as night, while Superman flies under the bright light of day.

I remember the (imo bad) 70s "what if" superman comic about what if he came to earth Today...   He did end up taking away all the nukes, iirc...    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember the (imo bad) 70s "what if" superman comic about what if he came to earth Today...   He did end up taking away all the nukes, iirc...    

 

After they had been launched and on their way to their respective targets un the US & USSR (it was WWIII, in 1990). He would later go on to call the people of Earth 'gullible fools'.

 

Read a humorous recap of that story here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel about Alan Moore rather like I feel about Christopher Nolan. Both are very good at conveying the dark, twisted drives in the human psyche. Neither has a really good grasp of the inspirational power of hope and idealism.

I thought Moore did a good job of that when he was writing Supreme.  It was basically a love letter to Silver Age Superman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Moore seems to have realised that he went off the deep end.

I don't think he did "go off the deep end."  Yeah he told some dark stories in his career but he's also done lighter fare, like Tom Strong and his work on Supreme.  Don't lump him in with a nut case like Frank Miller just because you don't like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he did "go off the deep end."  Yeah he told some dark stories in his career but he's also done lighter fare, like Tom Strong and his work on Supreme.  Don't lump him in with a nut case like Frank Miller just because you don't like him.

 

I didn't say I don't like him. For that matter I like Miller's early stuff too.

 

My point was that Moore's lighter work seems to be something of a reaction against his earlier, darker work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...