Hermit Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 14 hours ago, unclevlad said: Can I get an Amen from the congregation!!! Amen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DShomshak Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 15 hours ago, Pariah said: There is also the matter of the $100B+ in Saudi defense/weapons contracts that the President proudly declared won't be going to the Russians or the Chinese. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by avarice. Yeah, those arms sales. Which, I am assured on All Things Considered by someone who tracks these things, are not $100 billion. More like $14 billion. Still a big chunk o' change by a private citizen's standards, but, well, Trump can't help exaggerating. Or possibly including sales that were actually negotiated during the Obama administration (I've heard that as an explanation, too). It was also pointed out that Saudi Arabia can't just switch to other suppliers. Military hardware is not all interchangeable. You have to buy American parts for your American planes, and American missiles for your American launchers. Supposedly, if the US stopped the pipeline of materiel to Saudi, their war in Yemen would grind to a halt within a week. And they's be stuck for months, maybe years, while they replaced everything. I would enjoy seeing that happen. 1) The Saudi war in Yemen is an atrocity; even worse, an atrocity that cannot achieve its stated goal of blocking Iran. At least, it sure hasn't done so yet. 2) The Khashoggi case reminds me once more that Saudi Arabia is not a friend of the US or any other Western democracy. It may be an ally of convenience, but Saudi values are not the values we claim to uphold. Not among the royal family, anyway. And I haven't forgotten that most of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudi, and that Jihadism is largely a product of Wahhabist madrasas set up with Saudi and other Gulf Arab money. It would be good, I think, to remind these absolute monarchs that this alliance has limits, and they are not in a position to decide what those limits shall be. What can I say. I don't like despots, I don't like religious fanatics, and I really, really don't like false friends. Pretty strong issues, in fact. I should probably seek therapy. Dean Shomshak Pariah, pinecone, Doc Shadow and 2 others 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 Quote In 1991, as Mr. Trump was teetering on personal bankruptcy and scrambling to raise cash, he sold his 282-foot yacht "Princess" to Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin-Talal for $20 million, a third less than what he reportedly paid for it. Four years later, the prince came to his rescue again, joining other investors in a $325 million deal for Mr. Trump's money-losing Plaza Hotel. In 2001, Mr. Trump sold the entire 45th floor of the Trump World Tower across from the U.N. in New York for $12 million, the biggest purchase in that building to that point, according to the brokerage site Streeteasy. The buyer: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-and-saudi-arabia-deep-business-ties-spark-new-scrutiny/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnia Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/saudi-arabia-torture-womens-rights-activists_us_5bf572c8e4b03b230f9d8470 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 4 hours ago, Dr.Device said: And the news media covered Hilary's emails more than all policy issues combined during the 2016 election. Every detail was belabored again and again. For something that wasn't even a crime. I've heard several journalists muse that they might have gone overboard in trying to be "balanced" in their coverage of both candidates during the last presidential election. With all the things Trump had said and done constantly making the news, they felt pressure to keep returning to the Clinton email issue so they wouldn't be accused of biased reporting. But in doing so they might have created a false equivalency between that and Trump's antics in the minds of the electorate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Ternaugh said: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-and-saudi-arabia-deep-business-ties-spark-new-scrutiny/ The thing that gets me is, none of this news. Trump's ties to the Saudis have been known for years, as well as the Russians and others. And the mere whiff of such a scandal would sink the career of any other American politician. I just can't understand how we could have gotten to the point where anyone so compromised could even have run for President, much less won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 To me, this specific situation is symptomatic of a larger problem: out ridiculous dependence on hostile foreign governments. I've said it before, of course, but I think we spend way too much money on countries like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela and Iraq, just because they happen to have petroleum. Our supposedly trusted ally Pakistan was harboring Osama Bin Laden for who-knows-how-long. Our crushing national debt is owed in large part to China, who are rivals at best. And so on. We've done a remarkably poor job of choosing who we get in bed with politically, and if it hasn't already started, very soon I fear it's going to come back and bite us in the butt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 Since at least the 19th Century the major international powers have used the globe as their chess board. At times the "great game" has been cloaked in concerns over security, or promoting ideology; but at its heart it was always about competing for advantage, profit, dominance. The playing-pieces of other nations and peoples were taken up or dropped depending on their benefit to the player, not whether they were pristine or rotten to the core. And yes, it's already come back to bite America in the butt, numerous times. Sadam Hussein. The Nicaraguan Contras. The Shah of Iran. Manuel Noriega. Just to name a few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DShomshak Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Counterterrorism Expert Says He Thinks Trump Made A ... www.npr.org/2018/11/21/670142144/counterterrorism-expert... NPR's Audie Cornish talks with counterterrorism expert Daniel Benjamin, a Dartmouth researcher and former State Department official, about U.S.-Saudi relations, and which country needs the other more. From All Things Considered today. TL;DR: Saudi Arabia has very little leverage on the US; the US has a great deal of leverage over Saudi Arabia; and in his defense of Prince MBS, Trump projects weakness to Saudi and to the world. I also recommend the story after it, in which reporter John Itsty (sorry, I'm guessing at the spelling) analyzes the US-Saudi relationship from the petroleum perspective. For decades, Saudi has pressured the US by throttling back its oil production to raise prices. In 2014, however, the result was vast expansion of US shale oil production. If Sudi does this again, it makes shale oil profitable once more. So their great cudgel to use against the US... isn't. Dean Shomshak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 I don’t claim to be any kind of an expert, but based on what I’ve read, we have both the resources and technology to be energy independent if we chose to be. It’s going to be more expensive short term, of course, but in the long run I feel the benefits in terms of international entanglements, as well as pollution, would be well worth the investment. What we need is a speech like Kennedy’s “Man on the moon by the end of the decade” speech. We’re not going to get such a speech from this administration, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 The momentum in political movements in the Western world right now appears to be toward short-term gain in exchange for long-term pain, because the benefits are more immediate and hence easier to sell to voters. OTOH China is pouring billions of state dollars into all aspects of alternative energy development, and has the potential to become the leader in that technology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnia Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 This Thanksgiving, The Trump Administration Is Taking Land From The Tribe That Welcomed The Pilgrims Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 56 minutes ago, Cygnia said: This Thanksgiving, The Trump Administration Is Taking Land From The Tribe That Welcomed The Pilgrims To be fair, this particular insensitivity was set in motion under the Obama administration. And it's not like the American government has ever been shy in making paternalistic decisions for Native Americans. But Trump quoted as testifying, "They don't look like Indians to me..." This is the guy who thinks Middle Eastern terrorists could be hiding among Central American migrants. Because, hey, they're all brown, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoloOfEarth Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Lord Liaden said: But Trump quoted as testifying, "They don't look like Indians to me..." They should have worn feathered headdresses and said "How" a lot. That would have been 100% proof to Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnia Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 And I'm sure them wanting to build a casino on their land has no bearing at all...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 It does. Because other business interests want that casino money for themselves. Not to mention the government wanting tax revenue. (I'm all for discussion of the moral issues around casinos; but let's face, it's the money that makes people take notice.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted November 23, 2018 Report Share Posted November 23, 2018 Lawnmower Boy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclevlad Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 So... How will Trump attempt to denigrate, isolate, and discredit the government's own report, fundamentally saying climate change is already causing major problems, and that it is largely man-made. Well, let's start with the fact that it was released today...when everyone is still in a tryptophan daze, or hung over, or coming down from the zoo that is Doorbuster Black Friday Sales. Or just watching football and basketball.... But real news? Nah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 Most of the news media which doesn't try to spin everything to favor Trump will cover the report. Trump will probably call them tools of the liberal democratic deep state, as he usually does. He'll ignore his government's report, or call it questionable and then ignore it, as he has every government report he doesn't like. In this regard Trump has become quite predictable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 It's ridiculous to me that we're discussing climate change in the Politics thread. Since when did leaving the planet a habitable place for future generations become a partisan issue? YMMV, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 10 hours ago, Lord Liaden said: Most of the news media which doesn't try to spin everything to favor Trump will cover the report. Trump will probably call them tools of the liberal democratic deep state, as he usually does. He'll ignore his government's report, or call it questionable and then ignore it, as he has every government report he doesn't like. In this regard Trump has become quite predictable. You left out the Trump Organization asking to build a seawall to protect a golf course in Ireland from rising tides and storm damage associated with global warming, which was mentioned in the application. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/22/trump-wall-gets-permission-on-irish-golf-course.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnia Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 I need to get out of this state... https://www.salon.com/2018/11/21/ohio-republicans-declare-motherhood-necessary-want-to-make-it-mandatory/?fbclid=IwAR01KgUZYpMk-cRnmDW77Ldb6UF-kC-zOmZ2adXtiOQi8RCyQf941bSwczA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 No, you need to raise your voice to push your politicians to drop this whole line of endeavor. Because if it isn't halted it will just spread to the rest of the states. But it sure seems like the Republicans have given up on trying to woo more women voters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csyphrett Posted November 25, 2018 Report Share Posted November 25, 2018 17 hours ago, Cygnia said: I need to get out of this state... https://www.salon.com/2018/11/21/ohio-republicans-declare-motherhood-necessary-want-to-make-it-mandatory/?fbclid=IwAR01KgUZYpMk-cRnmDW77Ldb6UF-kC-zOmZ2adXtiOQi8RCyQf941bSwczA There has been some talk that this is a grandstand move with no real way to get voted on. It's hard to say how much traction this thing will actually get before it's struck if it ever even gets voted on. It does show that some people will always want to tell others what to do even when it's none of their business. CES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickstaPriest Posted November 25, 2018 Report Share Posted November 25, 2018 7 hours ago, csyphrett said: There has been some talk that this is a grandstand move with no real way to get voted on. It's hard to say how much traction this thing will actually get before it's struck if it ever even gets voted on. It does show that some people will always want to tell others what to do even when it's none of their business. CES Grandstanding today is application tomorrow. Though who knows how far this could actually go. Unfortunately grandstanding is a great way to test the viability of a movement in order to see if a politician can ride it into power (or to stay in power). For now, all we can do is tell them it's terrible and to stop. Anything that's going to happen will probably be years down the pipeline... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.