Joe Walsh Posted December 14, 2019 Report Share Posted December 14, 2019 49 minutes ago, Doc Democracy said: You mean NHS?? 😬 It would be political suicide and probably end the Conservatives as a political force, possibly forever. Right, NHS. Too much whiskey! 😜 I hope you're right, and the perspective that the Conservatives will privatise as much of the NHS as possible is just a bugaboo. There are a number of folks in the UK on other boards who worry otherwise, however. 😥 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinecone Posted December 14, 2019 Report Share Posted December 14, 2019 5 hours ago, death tribble said: With the current political situation in Britain and in America I am forced to ask this:- Has anybody here being doing deals with Nyarlathotep or Cthulhu ? Mention not the highest lord of the deepest Deep state! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted December 14, 2019 Report Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Doc Democracy said: You mean NHS?? 😬 It would be political suicide and probably end the Conservatives as a political force, possibly forever. Boris was caught discussing the sale of the NHS to American healthcare providers prior to the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Democracy Posted December 14, 2019 Report Share Posted December 14, 2019 47 minutes ago, Old Man said: Boris was caught discussing the sale of the NHS to American healthcare providers prior to the election. Boris was caught discussing a future trade deal with the US where he did not rule out including access to NHS contracts, potentially preferential access for US big pharma, meaning we in the UK would pay as much for those medicines as you do in the US. Obviously inflating drug costs would put additional pressure on the whole service and cause other things (like hospitals, doctors and nurses) get pared back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted December 15, 2019 Report Share Posted December 15, 2019 6 hours ago, DShomshak said: \Darn double posting... Addendum: Perhaps our Canadian correspondents could comment on Alberta and its discontents? Dean Shomshak Western discontent with the federal government (whom many see as catering to "Central Canada") goes back generations, at least as far as the National Energy Plan under Pierre Trudeau, Justin's father. Albertans viewed that as unfairly redistributing the benefits of their oil production; and consider Justin Trudeau's recent attempt to legislatively impose a carbon tax on their oil to curb greenhouse gas emissions, and failure to construct more pipelines to export Alberta crude, as more of the same. In general the Prairie Provinces and British Columbia have felt ignored and marginalized in Canadian national affairs for a very long time. Talk of a whole or partial Western separation from the rest of Canada rumbles up periodically. Current Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has been inflaming those passions as partial fuel for his recent election victory; but most observers I've read suspect he's just using that as leverage to gain more concessions for Alberta from the federal government (a time-honored tradition here). DShomshak 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted December 15, 2019 Report Share Posted December 15, 2019 On 12/13/2019 at 3:10 PM, death tribble said: Is this petulance ? US governor issues 428 pardons in final few days in office https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50786368 On 12/13/2019 at 3:40 PM, Old Man said: No, it’s corruption. I was going to say spite, but corruption works, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted December 15, 2019 Report Share Posted December 15, 2019 No, it’s straight up corruption. Dude took money from the families of the criminals in return for the pardons. Some of the released criminals are real winners, look it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted December 15, 2019 Report Share Posted December 15, 2019 I'm certainly not contesting the corruption part. I'm just saying that it sounds like the kind of thing a petty, spiteful politician on his way out would do, just because he could. I fully expect to see something like this when 45's reign comes to an end, with his own name and the names of several of his cronies prominently featured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Neilson Posted December 15, 2019 Report Share Posted December 15, 2019 14 hours ago, Lord Liaden said: Western discontent with the federal government (whom many see as catering to "Central Canada") goes back generations, at least as far as the National Energy Plan under Pierre Trudeau, Justin's father. Albertans viewed that as unfairly redistributing the benefits of their oil production; and consider Justin Trudeau's recent attempt to legislatively impose a carbon tax on their oil to curb greenhouse gas emissions, and failure to construct more pipelines to export Alberta crude, as more of the same. In general the Prairie Provinces and British Columbia have felt ignored and marginalized in Canadian national affairs for a very long time. Talk of a whole or partial Western separation from the rest of Canada rumbles up periodically. Current Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has been inflaming those passions as partial fuel for his recent election victory; but most observers I've read suspect he's just using that as leverage to gain more concessions for Alberta from the federal government (a time-honored tradition here). The practical reality is that Canadian elections are won or lost in central Canada. It holds 199 of 308 seats in Parliament. The Liberals lost their majority because they lost most of their seats in Quebec, but held on to the huge population in southern Ontario. The electoral map (there's one at https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/elections/federal/2019/results/) shows the sharp division between the regions. 114 of the 157 seats held by the Liberals are in Ontario or Quebec. They hold 15 of 104 seats west of Ontario (17 of 107 if we include northern Canada in there). Much of Quebec went to the Bloc Quebecois, a party which runs candidates only in that province, has separatist history, and focuses exclusively on what is best for that single province. Quebec has threatened separation since about the time of that National Energy Program, and they have received a lot of Federal spending and concessions in those decades. I don't think they or the West (whichever portion one chooses) would win from separation. Will the UK benefit from Brexit? People don't always make rational decisions from a purely objective/economic perspective. Quebec opposes expansion of pipelines, but ignores the recurring disasters when rail cars carrying oil and gas products derail. They came very close to running out of heating fuel during a recent rail strike. Objective, rational decisionmaking, or playing to human emotion to "protect the environment"? On the topic of inflaming emotion to win political points, consider the current treatment of the oil industry in Canada. We can't cater to one economic sector like the oil industry, of course. Just like the government has never provided special deals for aerospace (Bombardier), agriculture, auto manufacturers, forestry, fishing or firms like SNC Lavalin (oh, but they are in Quebec). Oh, wait... We prize diversity and inclusivity, but our Federal government does not speak out, much less take action, against one province banning its employees from wearing any and all religious symbols, as well as imposing more limited restrictions on anyone receiving public services. Oh, but that's Quebec - we wouldn't want to tell them about freedom of religion or anything. There is a distinct double standard. We need to eliminate oil-based fuels due to climate change. We need to switch over to zero emission vehicles. How do we replace hydrocarbons in rail transport, heavy trucks, marine transport or air carriers? That technology is decades away. But we will refuse pipelines and instead import oil from the middle east - where it is produced with considerably less concern for environmental impact. DShomshak, Lord Liaden and pinecone 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 A black woman faces prison for voting in 2016 Presidential Election tl;dr version: She was on probation after a felony conviction for assault. The law in question does not allow convicted felons to vote until their sentence, probation, and parole are completed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 If only... Cygnia 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 So, impeachment this week I guess, followed by a quick Senate vote to not remove. I have to say I'm surprised there will be a public Senate vote at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 They have to make at least a token show of following the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Never stopped them before... Pariah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Nah, they've wracked up a long list of token shows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BNakagawa Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 On 12/13/2019 at 4:41 PM, Old Man said: California is a breakeven state with respect to federal tax dollars. Secession would be economically devastating, however, even if it were permitted, since trade barriers would go up where none existed previously. Conversely, the Scots now have an economic choice between the EU and Boris' Brexited Britain. I'm not an economist but that seems like a no brainer in the long run. Business Inisider has California as receiving 12.7B less in federal aid than it pays in taxes, but given the size of California's economy, it isn't that big a deal. Iuz the Evil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iuz the Evil Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Just now, BNakagawa said: Business Inisider has California as receiving 12.7B less in federal aid than it pays in taxes, but given the size of California's economy, it isn't that big a deal. That lines up with what I'd heard in prior years about 91 cents on the Federal Tax dollar, but I didn't care enough to cite a source. Won't happen regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DShomshak Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 16 hours ago, Pariah said: If only... Did you ever see the old issue of What If? that had, "What If Captain America Ran for President?" Best line, from one Secret Service guy to another: "We're supposed to be protecting him?" Dean Shomshak TrickstaPriest, pinecone, Pariah and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DShomshak Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Incidentally, I've seen/heard a few news articles about how some Dem activists are unhappy there won't be any people of color on the next debate stage. I'm a little surprised myself, but it does put the lie to a longtime Republican accusation: That the Democratic party is the party of identity politics. So far, black voters pretty strongly favor Joe Biden instead of the candidates who "look like them," Booker and Harris. And Hispanics didn't propel Julian Castro into the top tier, either. Mayor Pete's being gay seems largely irrelevant in his pitch to voters. Republicans seem to be the only ones focused on ethnic/religious identity and cultural grievances. The news reports I've seen about the recent Bevins/Beshear dust-up, and the race in Louisiana, say the Dem candidates talked policy and the GOP candidates talked They're Not Like Us anger and loyalty to Trump. I invite any Republicans who still think policy and governance matter to jump over to the Democratic Party. Whatever you advocate, I suspect you have a better chance among Dems than you would in the Party of Trump. Dean Shomshak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DShomshak Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 Incidentally, I've seen/heard a few news articles about how some Dem activists are unhappy there won't be any people of color on the next debate stage. I'm a little surprised myself, but it does put the lie to a longtime Republican accusation: That the Democratic party is the party of identity politics. So far, black voters pretty strongly favor Joe Biden instead of the candidates who "look like them," Booker and Harris. And Hispanics didn't propel Julian Castro into the top tier, either. Mayor Pete's being gay seems largely irrelevant in his pitch to voters. Republicans seem to be the only ones focused on ethnic/religious identity and cultural grievances. The news reports I've seen about the recent Bevins/Beshear dust-up, and the race in Louisiana, say the Dem candidates talked policy and the GOP candidates talked They're Not Like Us anger and loyalty to Trump. I invite any Republicans who still think policy and governance matter to jump over to the Democratic Party. Whatever you advocate, I suspect you have a better chance among Dems than you would in the Party of Trump. Dean Shomshak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted December 18, 2019 Report Share Posted December 18, 2019 I had been a registered Republican* for a number of years, mostly out of inertia, but I've changed my registration to Independent after the 2016 election. *I wore a small, silver rhinoceros pin on my lapel when I last attended a presidential caucus (in 2012). A few people got it, but they were mostly moderates like me. Joe Walsh, Pariah and TrickstaPriest 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Ternaugh said: I had been a registered Republican* for a number of years, mostly out of inertia, but I've changed my registration to Independent after the 2016 election. My story is much the same. I changed over to Libertarian primarily because I thought Gary Johnson had most of it right in terms of policy. I never had the RINO pin, but I have used it as my avatar here and on the Book of Face. Ternaugh and TrickstaPriest 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 9 hours ago, DShomshak said: I'm a little surprised myself, but it does put the lie to a longtime Republican accusation: That the Democratic party is the party of identity politics. So far, black voters pretty strongly favor Joe Biden instead of the candidates who "look like them," Booker and Harris. And Hispanics didn't propel Julian Castro into the top tier, either. Mayor Pete's being gay seems largely irrelevant in his pitch to voters. Technically, this just proves which candidates are better at identity politics. 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megaplayboy Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 massey, Lawnmower Boy and Old Man 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megaplayboy Posted December 19, 2019 Report Share Posted December 19, 2019 10 hours ago, DShomshak said: Incidentally, I've seen/heard a few news articles about how some Dem activists are unhappy there won't be any people of color on the next debate stage. I'm a little surprised myself, but it does put the lie to a longtime Republican accusation: That the Democratic party is the party of identity politics. So far, black voters pretty strongly favor Joe Biden instead of the candidates who "look like them," Booker and Harris. And Hispanics didn't propel Julian Castro into the top tier, either. Mayor Pete's being gay seems largely irrelevant in his pitch to voters. Republicans seem to be the only ones focused on ethnic/religious identity and cultural grievances. The news reports I've seen about the recent Bevins/Beshear dust-up, and the race in Louisiana, say the Dem candidates talked policy and the GOP candidates talked They're Not Like Us anger and loyalty to Trump. I invite any Republicans who still think policy and governance matter to jump over to the Democratic Party. Whatever you advocate, I suspect you have a better chance among Dems than you would in the Party of Trump. Dean Shomshak Trumpism is fairly unambiguously white identity politics. Or "white grievance politics", if you will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.