Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Exclusive-Captain-of-aircraft-carrier-with-15167883.php

 

So, apparently the Navy is looking to remove this captain from command of the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which had to evacuate sailors in Guam following an outbreak of Covid19. Which was detected after he approved shore leave in Vietnam in March.

 

And probably elsewhere in April. 

 

This is probably going to get complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2020 at 1:31 AM, Starlord said:

 

Actually, I've been quite impressed with the leadership here in Ohio so far on Coronavirus.  Gov DeWine and Dr Acton acted swiftly and have been ahead of the curve and their daily television briefings of have been rock solid.

 

DeWine was mentioned on today's episode of The Daily, the NY Times radio program/podcastt. The subject was the resurgence of governors in national politics, arguing they'd sort of been eclipsed in public consciousness for the last decade or so as culture wars intensified and politics became more nationally focused. But with Trump making the federal government irrelevant for two months in responding to coronavirus, it's been left to governors -- and the difference in their responses has been stark. NY's Cupmo has been the most visible, but DeWine was noted as an example that Republican governors have not all parrotted Trump's line that everything's fine. Conversely, Florida's DeSantis was called out as particularly psittaceous.

 

Here in The Other Washington, yesterday Gov. Inslee said something good: We are not helpless in this crisis. "We have power in this thing. And the power we have is we can use our heads."

 

And today he vetoes a passel of bills he'd previously worked hard to get passed, as a way to cut $445 million from the state budget over the next two years. Because state revenues are going to take a beating, and there just won't be money for everything.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday the BBC interviewed perennial liberal Noam Chomsky, who amazingly is still alive (age 92, IIRC). He said the coronavirous was only the latest evidence that the radical capitalism of the last 4 decades or so Just Doesn't Work and we need to return to the days when corporations were regulated and billionaires were taxed.

 

To get an opinion from a very different source, today the BBC interviewed the editor of the business magazine Forbes. Who then said almost the same thing as Noam Chomsky: Milton Friedmanish, only stockholders matter free market absolutism does not work and must be changed. Corporations also need to operate for the benefit of workers, communities and society as a whole. The editor claimed that many of the billionaires he's interviewed say the same thing, though few are as yet willing to say it in public.

 

Okay, so talk is cheap. But I was surprised even to hear such talk from one of the cheerleaders of big business and big money.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday the BBC interviewed perennial liberal Noam Chomsky, who amazingly is still alive (age 92, IIRC). He said the coronavirous was only the latest evidence that the radical capitalism of the last 4 decades or so Just Doesn't Work and we need to return to the days when corporations were regulated and billionaires were taxed.

 

To get an opinion from a very different source, today the BBC interviewed the editor of the business magazine Forbes. Who then said almost the same thing as Noam Chomsky: Milton Friedmanish, only stockholders matter free market absolutism does not work and must be changed. Corporations also need to operate for the benefit of workers, communities and society as a whole. The editor claimed that many of the billionaires he's interviewed say the same thing, though few are as yet willing to say it in public.

 

Okay, so talk is cheap. But I was surprised even to hear such talk from one of the cheerleaders of big business and big money.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DShomshak said:

Yesterday the BBC interviewed perennial liberal Noam Chomsky, who amazingly is still alive (age 92, IIRC). He said the coronavirous was only the latest evidence that the radical capitalism of the last 4 decades or so Just Doesn't Work and we need to return to the days when corporations were regulated and billionaires were taxed.

 

To get an opinion from a very different source, today the BBC interviewed the editor of the business magazine Forbes. Who then said almost the same thing as Noam Chomsky: Milton Friedmanish, only stockholders matter free market absolutism does not work and must be changed. Corporations also need to operate for the benefit of workers, communities and society as a whole. The editor claimed that many of the billionaires he's interviewed say the same thing, though few are as yet willing to say it in public.

 

Okay, so talk is cheap. But I was surprised even to hear such talk from one of the cheerleaders of big business and big money.

 

Dean Shomshak

Forbes said that Trump's commerce secretary had lied about how much money he made to get on their billionaire list. It's no surprise they would say that big business only acts to secure a profit for the board and not for anyone else

 

CES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lord Liaden said:

There was a time when religious, philosophic, and pragmatic ethics was a required component of most economics curricula.

 

Pope_Francis_on_Economic_theory.jpg

I knew a guy who tried to say that trickle down worked if there was a certain amount of growth. I was like you're an idiot. Don't you read the paper you deliver?

CES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite interpretation of trickle-down economics was articulated on Jim Henson's satirical sitcom, Dinosaurs. Most rich people live in big houses on the tops of hills. If we give the rich more money, some of it is bound to fall out of their pockets and trickle down the hills to where the poor people live. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trickle Down Economics is the most inane policy ever invented. It assumes a progressive and altruistic streak in the rich that does not exist. It is however a great policy if you're rich and want to justify keeping your wealth. "hey...the more I make...the more will trickle down to the ….little people".'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dr. MID-Nite said:

It is however a great policy if you're rich and want to justify keeping your wealth.

 

That's literally its entire reason for existence.  Supply side economics has been known to be fake since before WWII.  It's nothing more than a disingenuous cover story for the rich.  They know it's a lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...