Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

The scariest part of this, IMO, is absolutely the plausible deniability point.  I saw this...when did it get posted here first, a week ago?  Didn't pay attenion...thought it was a 100% Lego.

 

NOT a Glock covered in Legos.

 

I cannot recall anything more idiotic.  Or wrongheaded.  I can even see a lot of serious, responsible gun owners, and they're darn sure out there...and probably a lot of police officers...who'd support banning something like this *in a heartbeat.*  Any product liability attorney would *cringe* at the implicit liability aspects, should any kid shoot himself or someone else.  There'd be some shared blame implied...how was the gun left out?  But the dimwits selling this kit would catch a LOT of the blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...