Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

The NYTimes podcast "The Daily" offers a brief guide to the "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory used by white supremacist mass shooters... and those who inspire them, such as Tucker Carlson.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/16/podcasts/the-daily/buffalo-shooting-replacement-theory.html?action=click&module=audio-series-bar&region=header&pgtype=Article

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, unclevlad said:

 

The problem is that Cheney's been stamped as a wannabe Democrat for her "disloyalty" so anything she says is ignored by the Republican leadership.  They're doing everything they can to remove all influence, and will be aiming to unseat her in the primaries.  


Wake me up when Cheney actually votes with the Democrats on any substantive bill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/14/2022 at 9:34 PM, Pariah said:

Tell me you've never seen Star Trek without telling me you've never seen Star Trek.

 

280451621_10159698856901469_707160621612

 

And now, the counterpoint:

 

Fox News Reporter Says Star Trek Has Never Been Woke Before, DS9 Writer Calls Him A Moron

 

The last paragraph of the article is classic:

 

Quote

For his part, Fox News' David Marcus does concede that Star Trek has always "delved into cultural and societal issues", and "reflect[ed] American and global foreign policy." He says that it's different this time, however, because now they're making it partisan by referencing the 2020 Capitol Riots, and bringing on Democrat Stacey Abrams for a guest role. I have no idea how this is any more political than the Bell Riots, explorations of homophobia, depictions of genocide, and showing freedom fighters in a positive light. I guess Marcus just isn't happy that he might be the one getting called out this time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Starlord said:

 

Since Erdogan assured the Finnish president several weeks ago that Turkey had no objection to Finland's membership, I'm inclined to side with those who believe this is just him ratcheting up his bargaining position. He wants more action taken against Kurds living in Finland, whom he claims are "terrorists," and/or the restoration of American arms sales to Turkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Old Man said:

One of these days I'll have to figure out why Erdogan hates the Kurds so damn much.

 

Honestly, that one's easy. Kurds in Turkey have long suffered systemic discrimination and past outright oppression by the majority ethnic Turks. Several states in the region, including Iraq, have sizeable Kurdish minorities, and many of them aspire to unite the areas where they predominate into an independent "Kurdistan." This would of course diminish the territory of Turkey and the other states, and create a new regional player to change the political balance.

 

Some Kurds have taken to more violent means to oppose the Turkish government. Many Kurds have emigrated to countries in Europe, particularly Sweden, and send money to their relatives in Turkey and their other home countries, often to support pro-independence groups. While some of that money may very well go to fund violence, Erdogan labels all Kurds opposing his regime as "terrorists" (very common designation by autocrats for their opponents these days), and those countries which have accepted Kurdish immigrants as harboring and supporting terrorists. Erdogan also accuses the Kurds as being among the factions who attempted a coup to overthrow him in 2016. Rightly or wrongly, that narrative suits his justification for instituting more dictatorial measures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Old Man said:

One of these days I'll have to figure out why Erdogan hates the Kurds so damn much.

Sniped by LL, but I'll finish anyway.

 

Not really an expert, but IIRC the issues between Turkey and the Kurds go back to the abolition of the Ottoman Empire. On the one hand, Kemal Ataturk's crew wanted to create a nation-state: Turkey, as the country of the Turks. Except... the territory included a wide area inhabited by Kurds, who insist they are not Turks on the factually irrefutable grounds that they aren't. They speak a completely different language (though Kurdish has absorbed many loan words from Turkish); they've lived in more or less their current territory since at least 2000 BCE. So when the Turkish government declared that there was no such thing as Kurds, they were "Mountain Turks" and had to learn Turkish, some Kurds got upset enough they turned to violence.

 

As LL mentions, Kurds exist in various other countries as well, creating a fairly sizeable movement that wants to lop off parts of those countries to create their own country of Kurdistan.

 

Leaving aside the justice of Kurdish rebels' cause or methods, Erdogan has shown he cannot abide any sort of pluralistic compromise on, well, anything. A rational person might think, "Hey, if I can make nice with our Kurdish population and make them feel they have a stake in my government, I can use them to give my country influence in other countries with Kurdish minorities." But the mythological basis of nationalism does not permit such a pragmatic course.

 

Nationalism: It's just not been a good thing.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/14/europe/sweden-finland-nato-next-steps-intl/index.html
 

So that’s official, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine massively strengthened NATO on their northern border (if approved, which I expect will eventually happen). Article 5 just took on a whole new significance.

 

On the other hand, this is quite the legacy achievement. Even the Soviet Union didn’t overcome the historic neutrality of those states. Impressive work by Putin in that respect…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2022 at 1:01 AM, unclevlad said:

Madison Cawthorn, the North Carolina Republican congressman who managed to alienate...well, almost everyone...lost in his primary today.  

But Budd won for the senate seat he was going for. Hopefully he will lose his election

CES 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, it's never too early to begin the indoctrination.  

 

It is unfortunately a VERY real book...and #19 on Amazon.  Not in its category...overall.

 

Reviews are, as you might expect, almost completely split...5 stars or 1 star, for 96% of em.

 

We know that truth has no significance;  only keeping the waters churning.  And not just today;  the Republican strategy has never been about just today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2022 at 7:40 AM, Pariah said:

I registered as Republican just so I could vote in the primary. Originally because Ammon Bundy was running (before messing up and having to be independent). But, McGeachin was a piece of work.

 

I was disappointed that Raúl Labrador won Attorney General.


1. As your next Attorney General I will be the aggressive, relentless leader that Idaho needs. I will defend Idaho’s sovereignty and fight unconstitutional mandates. I will keep our elections fair and honest. I will defend and expand our 2A rights. I will ensure we are the most pro-life state in the Union. I will fight to reinstate President Trump’s border security policies. I will fight the radicals that are trying to force CRT and transgender ideology on our children. And I will fight Big Tech’s social credit scores and their anti-conservative and anti-American censorship. Idaho needs an Attorney General who will be the people’s lawyer, rather than a tool for the bureaucracy and special interests. I will defend every Idahoan’s individual liberties; fight back against the Biden administration’s failed policies; and ensure the people of Idaho have a voice in the Attorney General’s office. I will bring needed reforms to the office. Idaho’s incumbent Attorney General has been in office for twenty-years. He’s been employed by the government for over thirty-years. No wonder he sees his job as defending the government and the bureaucracy, not you. I will change that starting day one.
2. Idaho needs an Attorney General who understands that government exists to ensure that the rights of the citizens are secured and protected. During the pandemic, I fought for the rights of Idahoans to keep their jobs and pursue their livelihoods, to meet with their families, and to continue practicing their religion freely. I fought for Idahoans’ medical freedom and against unconstitutional mandates. I will continue to do so as Idaho’s next Attorney General. In contrast, during the pandemic, the current Attorney General interpreted Idaho’s statutes as granting the chief executive the power to declare a state of emergency for over 750 days despite Idaho law limiting emergency authority to sixty days. That decision closed schools in Idaho, closed businesses and churches, and it affected every single person in Idaho dramatically. It was wrong and will not happen again if I am your Attorney General.
3. The great battles for the soul of our nation are taking place in our courthouses. All across America, strong Republican Attorneys General are pushing back against the Radical Left and their agenda to “fundamentally transform” our nation. Except in Idaho, where our Attorney General is absent from these fights. The incumbent Attorney General of Idaho did not fight for election integrity and instead stood with radical Democrat lawyers. The incumbent Attorney General did not defend Idaho’s pro-girl sports bill, instead saying that biological men had a constitutional right to compete on girls’ sports teams and use women’s locker rooms. Also, the incumbent Attorney General joined with Democrats to support some of Biden’s radical nominees to run the Department of Justice. Finally, he failed to join the lawsuit filed by the other Republican Attorneys General demanding the Biden DOJ either explain or rescind their memo asking to surveil parents for expressing their opinions at school board meetings and other forums. Maybe this is why he has received donations from former Democrat Attorneys General and the praise of the radical Attorney General from the State of Washington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...