Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

I particularly like the basis.

 

Quote

The president “does not spend every minute of every day exercising official responsibilities,” the opinion said. “And when he acts outside the functions of his office, he does not continue to enjoy immunity. … When he acts in an unofficial, private capacity, he is subject to civil suits like any private citizen.”

 

3 minutes ago, csyphrett said:

This defense has not worked for him in one of the Carrol cases either.

CES 

 

Where have any of his claims held up...other than, perhaps, a court run by one of his minion judges?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, unclevlad said:

b)  112 voted no...as did 2 Democrats.  Yeah, OK, the Freedom Caucus folks looked to be in there, but that's a lot more than just them.

 

The ATC story said two representatives voted "Present," rather than yea or nay, but didn't specify whether than yea or nay, but I didn't catch if the report specified they were Democrats. I could look it up, I suppose, but I'm busy with other things. I'm not sure how to interpret "Present."

 

Dean Shomshak

3 hours ago, Lord Liaden said:

H his empire of houses of cards is bleeding money to death, 

Ow, ow, mixed metaphors!

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, unclevlad said:

 

And while seeing Boebert and Greene out would be nice...it won't be via this route. 

 

I'm somewhat expecting that one or the other--or even both--will rage-quit after a tantrum complaining that they can't get anything done with all the RINOs in the House.  Or some other reason like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wcw43921 said:

 

I'm somewhat expecting that one or the other--or even both--will rage-quit after a tantrum complaining that they can't get anything done with all the RINOs in the House.  Or some other reason like that.

 

They may have come to believe that right-wing voters love them for themselves, not because they belong to the GOP, and will be reelected outside the Party. I hope they try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well.  I'll just say this - I hadn't actually realized he was still alive, for whatever that says about anything.

 

I believe I remember some Monty Python lines involving his name.  Actually... song... oh yes.  I own a copy of The Final Ripoff, fond memories of listening to that CD.

 

Lyrics
 
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
You're the Doctor of my dreams
With your crinkly hair and your glassy stare
And your machiavellian schemes
I know they say that you are very vain
And short and fat and pushy but at least you're not insane
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
And wishing you were here
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
You're so chubby and so neat
With your funny clothes and your squishy nose
You're like a German parakeet
All right so people say that you don't care
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrWolf said:

Well.  I'll just say this - I hadn't actually realized he was still alive, for whatever that says about anything.

 

I believe I remember some Monty Python lines involving his name.  Actually... song... oh yes.  I own a copy of The Final Ripoff, fond memories of listening to that CD.

 

Lyrics
 
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
You're the Doctor of my dreams
With your crinkly hair and your glassy stare
And your machiavellian schemes
I know they say that you are very vain
And short and fat and pushy but at least you're not insane
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
And wishing you were here
Henry Kissinger
How I'm missing yer
You're so chubby and so neat
With your funny clothes and your squishy nose
You're like a German parakeet
All right so people say that you don't care
 

 

That was where my mind went when I first heard of his passing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2023 at 4:23 PM, Lord Liaden said:

However these cases turn out, Trump is living every day in terror of punishment, his empire of houses of cards is bleeding money to death, and his precious "brand" is annihilated. That at least is some measure of justice.

 

The blood may be flowing into the sand the house of cards is built on but he keeps on throwing stones in it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, tkdguy said:

Another dirty trick: using deepfake to trash people you don't like:

 

 

Is this subject to legal repercussions?

It depends. If the person attacked can prove defamation in a state with those laws, then there could a lawsuit over. Since this video is supposedly a sliced together video of Cortez, she can sue maybe under the fact they used her appearance.

CES   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the man's comments at around 2:13 on..."it doesn't need to be plausible, because people are so desperate to believe things about those they despise that they utterly suspend their disbelief."  That's significant here, in that part of the defense against defamation, in similar cases, has been "no reasonable person believes him."  This arguably spears that smack in the side, if it's accepted as accurate.

 

The issue first would be, WHO would you sue?  The Dominion case was easy because all of Fox News was a massive target.  Who did this?  Finding that out is exceptionally difficult, if not impossible, as it's SO easy to do this, and to slip it into channels.  If it's a foreign national, then trying to bring the case is hard, and collecting on any judgment would be even harder, assuming we're talking an unfriendly nation.  If it's a US citizen, fine, you can win the case, assuming you can identify the person responsible, and can prove it...you can conceivably argue for reasonably sizable damages.  But what can you collect?

 

I'm fairly sure the #1 problem, tho, is the needle in a haystack problem.  Look how infrequently spam email servers or the robocall centers get shut down...and they're responsible for massively more activity, which is also explicitly criminal activity, not civil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden issued his statement.

 

I’ll never forget the first time I met Dr. Kissinger. I was a young Senator, and he was Secretary of State—giving a briefing on the state of the world. Throughout our careers, we often disagreed. And often strongly. But from that first briefing — his fierce intellect and profound strategic focus was evident. Long after retiring from government, he continued to offer his views and ideas to the most important policy discussion across multiple generations. Jill and I send our condolences to his wife Nancy, his children Elizabeth and David, his grandchildren, and all those who loved him.

 

 

Morbius was the one of the movies of all time. 

 

That is the most lukewarm tribute to a deceased person I've ever read.  

 

Edited by Clonus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...