Jump to content

Relativistic math question.


megaplayboy

Recommended Posts

I was going to calculate it for you, but it turns out that I don't have access to anything that will calculate results to 43 significant figures.

 

Edit: I found an arbitrary precision calculator online, and if I did the calculations correctly (no promises here) the answer is about 3.05 x 10^21 kg, which seems a little low, since it's about 1/1000 the mass of the Earth.

 

I've been going over the math and it looks right. I'll admit to being surprised and I would welcome a second opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to calculate it for you, but it turns out that I don't have access to anything that will calculate results to 43 significant figures.

 

Edit: I found an arbitrary precision calculator online, and if I did the calculations correctly (no promises here) the answer is about 3.05 x 10^21 kg, which seems a little low, since it's about 1/1000 the mass of the Earth.

 

I've been going over the math and it looks right. I'll admit to being surprised and I would welcome a second opinion.

That...seems plausible. The "oh my god" particle had a relativistic mass about 300 billion x rest.

 

So, a human sized mass moving at (c-planck) would have a relativistic kinetic energy of 0.5 x (3.05 x 10^23)(3 x 10^8)(3 x 10^8), or about 1.5 x 10^40 joules. Or, if you compressed the universe into a fist-sized mass and accelerated it to this speed, the relativistic KE would be around 10^90 joules. Or about 300 Damage Classes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So, a human sized mass moving at (c-planck) would have a relativistic kinetic energy of 0.5 x (3.05 x 10^23)(3 x 10^8)(3 x 10^8), or about 1.5 x 10^40 joules.

There is the minor issue of where that energy came from, how you got it all into that small mass, and what you did with all the waste heat from the process of getting all that confined in that way.

 

Perhaps just as informative, compute the energy density in that moving mass, then go to your cosmological-model-of-choice and see when the primordial fireball had that energy density. My guess is that it was Real Early On.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is the minor issue of where that energy came from, how you got it all into that small mass, and what you did with all the waste heat from the process of getting all that confined in that way.

Ask Petey. He did that at least twice. At least:

http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2004-08-20

http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2004-08-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...