Jump to content

Thor: Ragnarok spoiler thread


Bazza

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Lord Liaden said:

Deleted due to unnecessary provocativeness.

 

Liar. Everyone knows Canadians are too polite to do provocativeness. ;)

 

I have a general rule of thumb: If a movie has a stupid thing in it, and is otherwise good, I forgive the stupid thing. There aren't many perfect movies, so I'd never be able to enjoy anything if I wasn't willing to overlook the occasional logical gap or sub-par storytelling technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to interviews with all the major players all they had was a rough outline of a script and they primarily riffed and improv'd their way through the entire shoot.  This was barely a Marvel movie and more a zany, silly space comedy.  It seems pointless to try to pick at something that is akin to Spaceballs or Bill and Ted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Starlord said:

According to interviews with all the major players all they had was a rough outline of a script and they primarily riffed and improv'd their way through the entire shoot.

 

That's a condemnation, in my book, not a justification. The movie turned out well (overall) despite the lack of planning, writing, or careful development that movies deserve, and everyone involved has surely breathed a heavy sigh of relief at having gotten away with it. Usually when you wing it like that, you end up with something more akin to Justice League. We should all hope and pray Marvel doesn't do it that way ever again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I have a general rule of thumb: If a movie has a stupid thing in it, and is otherwise good, I forgive the stupid thing.

 

It depends on the stupid thing but yeah, generally I'll follow that rule too.  I like Raiders of the Lost Ark despite its various plot holes and problems.  You can do something dumb even a few times and if its otherwise entertaining and well done; okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the Quinjet. Funny thing is, I distinctly remember a conversation between Natasha and Fury where he said they found the Quinjet in the ocean or something, but no sign of Banner or the Hulk. I always assumed that one of the Grandmaster's minions (maybe Valkyrie herself, having seen Hulk fight by following Thor) took him to Sakar. Not sure where the Quinjet came from unless Tony let him use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, zslane said:

 

That's a condemnation, in my book, not a justification. The movie turned out well (overall) despite the lack of planning, writing, or careful development that movies deserve, and everyone involved has surely breathed a heavy sigh of relief at having gotten away with it. Usually when you wing it like that, you end up with something more akin to Justice League. We should all hope and pray Marvel doesn't do it that way ever again.

 

Second this. 

 

I must be in the minority but I really liked the first and second Thor movies. This one however, although it had some amusing moments, didn't work for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zslane said:

 

That's a condemnation, in my book, not a justification. The movie turned out well (overall) despite the lack of planning, writing, or careful development that movies deserve, and everyone involved has surely breathed a heavy sigh of relief at having gotten away with it. Usually when you wing it like that, you end up with something more akin to Justice League. We should all hope and pray Marvel doesn't do it that way ever again.

 

Marvel hired a director who's known to work that way, and had produced movies which demonstrated that he knows what he's doing, where he wants to go, and how to get there. Sure, it was a gamble to hand him a big-budget effects film, and to take an established character in a new direction; but it was a calculated, considered gamble, and it paid off very handsomely at the box office. Note that I didn't care for Ragnarok myself -- classic comic-book Thor is my favorite superhero -- but a lot of people feel it revitalized the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...