Jump to content

The Academics Thread


Pariah

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Pariah said:

There are very few things in nature, it seems, that do not spin. 

 

"Make it spin! Spinning is so much cooler than not spinning."

 

 

It's worse than you think.  No quarks or leptons have a quantum spin of zero, so in essence, all matter spins.

 

Getting dizzy... gonna hurl...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, L. Marcus said:

Virtual vomit? Almost poetic.

 

Wanna see him turn green?  Ask him if the particles' rotations are subject to LS coupling or j-j coupling.  I suggest being behind a plexiglass barrier when you ask, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gave final exams today. Because they were of the multiple choice variety, I already have them scored and grades entered.

 

With everything that's happened in the last several days, I have basically no motivation to go in and put in a full day tomorrow. But I have even less motivation to do the lesson planning that would be necessary to call in a sub.

 

I swear this is the only occupation where it's easier just to go to work when you feel like crap than to take a day off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Estimate the size of impactor needed to boil away Earth's oceans.

 

Initially, you will need to estimate the energy needed to do that.  Assume the Earth's oceans cover 3/4 of its surface and are a uniform 3 km deep, and that they are at their maximum-density temperature for (pure) liquid water at standard pressure.  With water's specific heat and latent head of vaporization, this lets you compute the energy.

 

The only source of energy is the kinetic energy of the impactor.  Two cases are worth exploring: an asteroidal planetesimal with a density of about 3 metric tons per cubic meter and an impact velocity of about 25 km/s; and a cometary impactor with a density of about 1 metric ton per cubic meter and an impact velocity of 60 km/s.

 

Obviously not all the impactor's KE goes into boiling water, but the fraction is unlikely to be less than 5 to 10%, so assume an impactor mass ten times that needed to get ten times the "boil-away energy" computed in the first paragraph.  Compute both the impactor mass and impactor radius of spherical objects in the two cases.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...