Jump to content

The Academics Thread


Pariah

Recommended Posts

I was told that a prominent nuclear physics theoretician asserts that all physicists are either autistic or schizophrenic, and the first icebreaker session he has with the undergrad summer research interns has everyone stating which one of those they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2018 at 3:44 PM, Cancer said:

* Cancer returns from getting honest data with which to refute an administrator's ambush using grossly biased numbers *

 

One of those messages that rather than being carried, really should be fired at him.

 

One thing I love to tell my students: "If there is a first and great commandment in science, it is this: Thou shalt not disregard the data. The numbers say what the numbers say."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current question being graded: What is the Roche limit?  How is it applicable to the systems of bodies orbiting the Jovian planets?

 



Zero point answer:

 

I might give an LOL point for that if I see it, though.



The Roche limit is how many roches you have to see before you get disgusted and call an exterminator.

 

The moons of Jupiter and Saturn are just crawling with the things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Cancer said:

Current question being graded: What is the Roche limit?  How is it applicable to the systems of bodies orbiting the Jovian planets?

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 


Zero point answer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I might give an LOL point for that if I see it, though.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
 


The Roche limit is how many roches you have to see before you get disgusted and call an exterminator.

 

The moons of Jupiter and Saturn are just crawling with the things.
 
 

 

 

Wasn't Roche the guy who kept running for President as an Independent?

 

 

WHat?

 

I didn't know planets could be jovial?

 

WHAT??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trap I had not previously appreciated: asking a question where students have heard about the subject (case at hand, the greenhouse effect) and mistakenly think they understand it.

 

It's even more of a trap when you promised them a question on the final about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎6‎/‎2018 at 5:44 PM, Cancer said:

* Cancer returns from getting honest data with which to refute an administrator's ambush using grossly biased numbers *

 

One of those messages that rather than being carried, really should be fired at him.

 

Is the administrator Han "Never tell me the odds" Solo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...