Jump to content
Gauntlet

Why purchase a Skill Level with All Attacks?

Recommended Posts

On ‎10‎/‎23‎/‎2019 at 1:24 PM, Hugh Neilson said:

The only basis I can see for CV being costed at 5 CP is that, pre-6e, the closest thing we had was +1 Skill Level, DCV only, for 5 points. 

That's logical. So effectively, the Advantage that a Skill level can "add 1/2 DC" (+1/4?) is balanced by the Limitation: "Extra Time: 0 Phase" (-1/4?)

 

If that's the case the 5E Skill Costs do seem to work better.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2019 at 9:02 PM, Greywind said:

That presupposes that such balance is actually attainable.

 

If we do not believe balance, at least in a rough sense, can be attained, why bother with a point-based system?  If the points are not about balance, what is their purpose?  An environment where those with greater systems mastery can identify the bargain prices, and the best synergies, to design the most (over) powerful characters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Hugh Neilson said:

 

If we do not believe balance, at least in a rough sense, can be attained, why bother with a point-based system?  If the points are not about balance, what is their purpose?  An environment where those with greater systems mastery can identify the bargain prices, and the best synergies, to design the most (over) powerful characters?

Wow! Way to blow Greywind’s comment outta  proportion. No one is suggesting that we shouldn’t try to have a balanced system however as 6 editions show though, a perfectly balanced system is a fools errand. It’s counter productive. I feel that it’s costing the game new players. Isn’t trying to get to perfect balance got us to 2 volume 6th edition? Seriously with Gnome Body’s “because it punishes some concepts”, really punishes? How about enjoy the game and don’t worry about some getting a point or two more than you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wow! Way to blow Greywind’s comment outta  proportion.

 

Hm just seemed like a reasonable response, pointing out that you have to work toward the best levels of balance and mathematical value you can.  You'll never get perfect balance, but just throwing up your hands and saying "its not possible!" is silly as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luke said "it's not possible" and threw up his hand.

 

Is 1 pt in STR equal to 1 pt in DEX? Seems the numbers would say they would, but then why does DEX cost more?

 

All the arguments of "this stat does more/less than that stat, so it should cost more/less" seem to point out that a lot of the stat valuation is based solely on experience and usage. So, since most players/GMs got nothing out of COM, it went away and we got the Striking Appearance in its place.

 

And we have dry areas in stats where they do nothing except get us a little closer to the next skill break point.

 

Two different 450 pt characters are equal. Not necessarily balanced against each other, but equal. Equal in value. It takes a GM to sit and go over the characters to find the balance between them, based on his experience, expected usage, and opinion. And opinion is nothing to base a balance on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/26/2019 at 6:42 AM, Ninja-Bear said:

Wow! Way to blow Greywind’s comment outta  proportion. No one is suggesting that we shouldn’t try to have a balanced system however as 6 editions show though, a perfectly balanced system is a fools errand. It’s counter productive. I feel that it’s costing the game new players. Isn’t trying to get to perfect balance got us to 2 volume 6th edition? Seriously with Gnome Body’s “because it punishes some concepts”, really punishes? How about enjoy the game and don’t worry about some getting a point or two more than you.

 

As an example of a "punished concept", try building a "highly trained normal" in 5e under the constraint that he is Normal, not Legendary - no stat permitted to exceed NCM, including DEX, SPD and CON.  He should be able to compete with a character having a 33 DEX and 6 SPD, in a 12 DC/25 defenses standard campaign.  How many more points will the "legendary/superhuman" concept have to spend on other abilities?

 

Perfect balance is definitely impossible, as a perfect comparison of disparate abilities cannot be done objectively.  However, we can see in play that certain abilities are exceptionally valuable for their cost, and others seem like they do not deliver value for their points.  As well, when we build the exact same things in two or more reasonable ways, and the cost is markedly different, that is an objective imbalance.

 

On 10/26/2019 at 11:06 AM, Christopher R Taylor said:

 

Hm just seemed like a reasonable response, pointing out that you have to work toward the best levels of balance and mathematical value you can.  You'll never get perfect balance, but just throwing up your hands and saying "its not possible!" is silly as well.

 

Exactly

 

On 10/26/2019 at 12:36 PM, Greywind said:

Luke said "it's not possible" and threw up his hand.

 

Is 1 pt in STR equal to 1 pt in DEX? Seems the numbers would say they would, but then why does DEX cost more?

 

All the arguments of "this stat does more/less than that stat, so it should cost more/less" seem to point out that a lot of the stat valuation is based solely on experience and usage. So, since most players/GMs got nothing out of COM, it went away and we got the Striking Appearance in its place.

 

And we have dry areas in stats where they do nothing except get us a little closer to the next skill break point.

 

Two different 450 pt characters are equal. Not necessarily balanced against each other, but equal. Equal in value. It takes a GM to sit and go over the characters to find the balance between them, based on his experience, expected usage, and opinion. And opinion is nothing to base a balance on.

 

Stats are challenging.  When 6e was initially released, I considered DEX overpriced compared to INT and PRE.  All three provide bonuses to several skills, and "something else" (initiative; PER; PRE attacks and defense).  Over time, I have moved to the belief that INT and PRE are underpriced.  +1 to all rolls (other than PER for INT) should cost 5 points.  Skill levels are still overpriced under this model as they do not enhance all rolls at once.  The other ability should cost 5 points (+5 initiative; +1 to all PER rolls; +1d6 PRE attack - and PRE defense should move to EGO exclusively).

 

STR has to be evaluated against other options to do damage.  I do not think doubling its cost would work, as it would then be too costly.  I do think a review of the various ways of increasing STR damage and effects is needed (Hand Attack is not as valuable as a MA DC, for example) and their pricing based on STR with limitations and advantages (that includes MA DCs being 0 END).

 

As I understand Steve's logic, COM went away because COM was not a characteristic.  It had no mechanical effects.  More importantly, any effect it would be given, based on five editions of house rules and online suggestions, modified PRE, another characteristic.  So it was changed into a talent built with limited PRE.  Maybe Martial Arts DCs and Hand Attack should be talents like Deadly Blow.   They do the same thing.

 

Requiring an advanced understanding reaching a near-intuitive level of how various abilities balance, despite their point costs, markedly reduces the number of people who can effectively GM a Hero game, constraining its market.  That's not good for the business model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/28/2019 at 7:39 AM, Hugh Neilson said:

Requiring an advanced understanding reaching a near-intuitive level of how various abilities balance, despite their point costs, markedly reduces the number of people who can effectively GM a Hero game, constraining its market. 

 

I've received matching feedback from several of my Fantasy HERO players.

 

They enjoy the game system, but they'd never even consider being a GM for it.  Too complicated and too much haggle room.

 

Systems with hard rails - like D&D 5e - do take a good chunk of workload off the DM.  There's little haggling as what does or doesn't constitute a legal/fair/balanced character is set in stone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

There's little haggling as what does or doesn't constitute a legal/fair/balanced character is set in stone.

 

I'd say its sort of the opposite, since there's no objective standards or basis for balance.  Its all arbitrarily declared.  yes, its based on decades of play, but still: its just what they assert: this is a 3rd level spell.  That is a 14th level ability.  No, what D&D does is not make balance easier, it makes flexibility more guesswork: you can make a new class/spell/item/feat, etc but you're simply guessing based on on what has gone before.  The "splat" books are a perfect example of how well that works out.

 

At this point D&D is every bit as complex as Hero, its just familiar so people know it well and are comfortable with its complexities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Christopher R Taylor said:

I'd say its sort of the opposite, since there's no objective standards or basis for balance.  Its all arbitrarily declared.  yes, its based on decades of play, but still: its just what they assert: this is a 3rd level spell.  That is a 14th level ability.  No, what D&D does is not make balance easier, it makes flexibility more guesswork: you can make a new class/spell/item/feat, etc but you're simply guessing based on on what has gone before.  The "splat" books are a perfect example of how well that works out.

 

At this point D&D is every bit as complex as Hero, its just familiar so people know it well and are comfortable with its complexities.

D&D is actually worse.  Every bloody spell is its own unique snowflake that every bloody caster will have to look up every time they cast it.  Every bloody class feature has to be learned all over the instant anyone changes class.  Every bloody monster ability has to be looked up by the GM for each new monster.  Every bloody feat etc etc you get it by now. 

D&D's design is "Let's build everything out of exceptions!" and means that learning D&D is im-expletiveing-possible.  People just get used to "Caster = look stuff up" or ignore their abilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ScottishFox said:

Systems with hard rails - like D&D 5e - do take a good chunk of workload off the DM.  There's little haggling as what does or doesn't constitute a legal/fair/balanced character is set in stone.

 

That's the nail on the head for me. Hero's subjectivity.

 

If I buy a 5-6 level adventure for D&D I know that it will pretty much work for characters of those levels.

 

If I buy a Standard Superheroic 6E HERO adventure then I'm probably going to have to do a lot of work to tailor it to my game. The writer's idea of what is right for that sort of level is probably very different from mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what's missing in the adventures (not that there are any 6th edition Champions adventures for sale...) is that they don't have "this is the ideal power level" usually.  My Fantasy Hero scenarios do, but most don't.  So its not so much "hero is too subjective and takes too much work" its that D&D puts the power range you can reasonably play this scenario in, and Hero doesn't...

 

...yet ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...