nblade

Strangly enough that power construt could have uses with a few mods. Each charge would last only 1 phase and after that you would lose the +50 stun. For that one phase you would be up, but after that you would likely go back down below 1 stun, until 3 more phases past, since you would be out of charges. Likely you would try to recovery during the first use of the charge, so you wouldn't have to use the other charges or you just leave it as a "last great stand before your knocked out" kind of thing. Of course it can be an abuse, so I'd likely not allow a PC to have it, but something like it with a single charge could be interesting for a villian to have. As to End Reserves on Charges, I'd likely have to see the actual construct.. I'm think it would be unlikely that I'd find one I'd allow. Still I think Steve's comment was more along the lines of "I'm not forbiding since there might be a cool effect only possible by allowing it".

Re: Re: Re: About Dodge... That's an interesting question. The point about CSL I was thinking about was HTH only or Ranged only Skill Levels. In the HTH example you could use them for DCV but only against other HTH attacks. At least that is my understand, so you question about Martial is an intersting question. As a general ruling for my game, I'd have to ask was the attack you were dodging HTH or ranged? Which every one it was would get the FULL DCV of 18, and the other 13. Example, say you dodged a fist, you would be DCV 18 vs all HTH, and DCV 13 for all ranged attacks. Unless of course the skill levels where 5pts levels, then it would always be 18 in those cases.

Re: About Dodge... Like any combat maneuver, it valid against all attacks until next phase. The only things that may or may not be applied is CSL, depending on their type and how they are used.

From the looks of the formula, more like 9.

Actually the parachute is part of the pilot's gear and not really part of the plane. This gear would include a slew of survival equipment as well. Not that it really matters, but it would be an interesting diversion to see a complete write up of the the parachute and survival gear.

You know I swear I've seen an example of this in a published product, but I have no idea where. I'd say likely around -1/2 myself.

Well if that's your only issue with, then I think you should just rebuild it without the Hardened. It would be a pt or two cheaper I'm sure. Of course with AP attacks only the CL Def is not halved, regular defenese are still halved unless they also are hardened. As for Penatrating, I'd follow the Rules FAQ idea of if the pentrating attack does more body then the defenses that are hardened, then those defenses are ignored. At least I think that's a sugguestion.

well glad I got it right. (been one of those months, if you know what I mean)

To be honest, I really don't know. I'm going to guess and say that it is likely still the same.

I'm going to guess that this is what your looking for. http://www.globalguardians.com/master%20lists/index.html

Why even use an acronym? I know it sort of in the spirit I suppose, but people name thier computers every day and they don't have to have acronyms.

I have to agree. Sometime I'm looking for a limiation or advantage and I'll be darned its not in the limiations nor advantage section, but in the Attack power or other section. Sometimes drives me made. But like all things I cope.

What they are not?

I'm sure that a matter of one's POV. I'd have to say yes and no to that question.

It is a bit odd, but off the top of my head, I see no reason that this construct couldn't be allowed. Of course in the end its up to the GM opinion, if it is allowed.