Re: Question about "Pulp"
Since I see this so often, I thought I should clarify the whole thing a little bit. "Pulp" technically has one meaning, that being the magazines printed on cheap, pulp paper,or the stories that appeared in them. Pulp magazines covered a whole lot of ground over the 40+ years they were around and calling every kind of story that appeared in them "pulp" can be very misleading.
Usually, what people nowadays mean when they're talking about pulps or pulp fiction is one of two things- "hero" pulps like Doc Savage and The Shadow or hard-boiled detective stories about Sam Spade, Philip Marlowe and the like (including sleaze-o stuff by writers like Robert Leslie Bellam).
Movies like Indiana Jones or The Rocketeer that are often referred to as being "pulpy" are actually based directly on the old movie serials, not the pulps. They were the film equivalent of the hero pulps, but had as much in common with comic books and comic strips of the time (there were serials based on Captain Marvel, Blackhawk, Flash Gordon, and Buck Rogers, for example). Like movie serials, "film noir" movies were the cinema equivalent of the crime/detective pulps, many of them taken directly from stories that appeared in the magazines (like Hammet's "The Maltese Falcon or Chandler's "The Big Sleep".)
It seems like "pulp" has come to mean cheap thrills from the 30's and 40's, but that type of "cheap, fast, and out of control" storytelling, whether it's in the form of film, print, or even radio, to a smaller extent was a product of the time just before, during, and after World War II.
I guess if you had to give it all one name, it might as well be "pulp", but calling Daredevils of the Red Circle "pulp" is like calling "The Master of the World" "steampunk". It just don't seem right, I tells ya!