Re: MYTHIC HERO: What Do *You* Want To See?
I am? That’s news to me.
I don’t see a lot of value in assigning uniform point values to all legends. For one, it closes up design space by limiting the range of points that can be assigned to any given character. By the same token, there’s the threat of making all the characters only useful at specific points in the PCs career. Let’s say, for example, that you set up a rivalry between Gawain and the party, which they resolve, and then start to look for the next rivalry in Lancelot. Well, by all rights Lancelot should be head and shoulders over Gawain, but if they’re built on the same points then you’ll have to modify Lancelot a fair bit to make him a believable step up over Gawain.
It is also make-work because the author needs to figure out where all the unused points that are left over go to for lesser characters. I mean, Sir Kay is less competent than King Arthur in every way that really counts, so once you’ve developed Arthur and established his level of proficiency you’d go to Kay and set him up to be largely less competent. Having set up Kay as noticeably weaker than Arthur in key areas, you’ll have a whole bunch of “extra” points for Kay that need to be spent to make the point values uniform. So these points get tossed at a whole bunch of miscellany and suddenly Kay can speak Swedish, or something, simply because he had points that needed to be burnt off.
Some characters are simply more competent then others and the way to document this mechanically is through a difference in total points.