Re: "You're not a REAL Hero!"
Bah! A hero is simply someone who uses whatever abilities he or she has to do something for the betterment of society without any thought of reward or duty. I'm surprised nobody has brought up the dictionary definition yet. Pay attention to number three.
1: In mythology and legend, a man, often of divine ancestry, who is endowed with great courage and strength, celebrated for his bold exploits, and favored by the gods.
2: A person noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life.
3: A person noted for special achievement in a particular field: the heroes of medicine.
4: The principal male character in a novel, poem, or dramatic presentation.
As an aside...
Whoever said Batman's not a hero obviously hasn't paid attention to all the times Batman gets the crap beat out of him... All the times he gets put in traps and whatnot. That's not risking life and limb? He's not invulnerable so he HAS to be smart. He's still donating his time, energy, MONEY and whatever else can be listed to try to keep Gotham clean.
Edit: Okay, I conceed he's dark and whatnot, but he DOES save lives, stop robberies and so on. Perhaps revenge motivates him, but what he DOES helps people. Maybe he's not a four-color, upstanding, moral, perfect version of a hero, but he is still a hero. If nothing else, at least in the eyes of the people his actions help.
To whomever said it was more noble to donate time than money, let me point out... The person who donates money likely does some kind of job to earn that money. Jobs take time. Therefor by donating money they ARE, in effect, donating their time - just not directly.
Let me put forth a new moral quandry in a similar vein. Who would be more "heroic":
A professional who puts in a 50 hour week, makes good money to support his family and then donates the recompense for the last 10 hours of work to charity...
or
A person who puts in a 40 hour week, makes enough money to support his family and then donates 10 hours of service to the same charity?
Both have supported the charity. Both have spent the same number of hours away from their loved ones in the week. And in the end, the second example can't use their 10 hours of service to buy blankets or food, if those are needed. The tradeoff is that the first person's money will not represent them at a 1:1 rate.
I personally fail to see the 'heroic' difference between someone who can absorb a shot from a pistol running around jumping in front of police in shootouts... and someone who donates a huge sum of money to buy ALL said police bulletproof vests. It's different means to the same end - officers are saved.
Anyhow, that's my $0.027 (inflation )
-Todd