Jump to content

Thia Halmades

HERO Member
  • Posts

    8,650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Thia Halmades last won the day on October 2 2020

Thia Halmades had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About Thia Halmades

  • Birthday 06/24/1975

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    : New House, Who Dis?
  • Biography
    Full time DM, hockey wachin', gamer junkie. Married. With toddler.
  • Occupation
    Learning, and re-learning, my job over and over again.

Recent Profile Visitors

728 profile views

Thia Halmades's Achievements

Single Status Update

See all updates by Thia Halmades

  1. Quote

    My question has always been this: There’s this whole thing about abortion. But no one is willing to step up with daycare. Or the cost of healthcare. Or defund the military by a few million — against its trillions — to rebuild our public school system. You can’t save the children then forget about them. It’s not about being Christian; it’s code for racism and suppression of women.

     

    THANK YOU for saying that. I always ask this of Anti-Choice people, but they never give me a satisfactory answer.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Thia Halmades

      Thia Halmades

      The other thing that warrants mentioning is this: Anti-Choice is fine. Just as women didn’t want the right to vote, and fought against suffragists. I, myself, am PRO LIFE. I have a baby. I cannot imagine terminating a pregnancy. But I will FOREVER vote PRO-CHOICE. Why? Because it’s not my f’n place. It’s not my call. It’s frankly none of my GD business, and as a conservative (no true Scotsman fallacy, don’t even start me on the whole RINO blah blah blah) I am a HUGE supporter of individual liberty and an equally loud supporter of my right to make my own choices. So that’s the thing. 

       

      You don’t LOSE ANYTHING but giving someone ELSE a choice they very clearly need. I could go on like this for, frankly, hours. But you get the gist.

    3. Ragitsu

      Ragitsu

      I use the term "Anti-Choice" for two reasons.

       
      1. "Pro-Life" brings an asymmetry to a pair of definitions that should be accurate and focused on one single topic -> "Pro Choice" and "Anti Choice" as it relates to the option to have an abortion. The reasons as to "why" someone holds a P.O.V. can be brought forth in good time, but everyone should be on equal footing.
       
      2. Many "Pro-Life" people are for the death penalty, for imperialist/colonialist policies (i.e., offensive wars in general), for the "War on Drugs", for lethal means of self-defense, against universal healthcare, against universal maternity/paternity leave, against S.N.A.P., against subsidizing healthy food over junk food, resistant to green energy plans, et cetera. If someone truly is "Pro-Life" across the board, great: I applaud them for their consistency. However, because the discussion is not about the topic of life (and quality of life) in a wider sense, a broad term being used in this narrow context is inappropriate.
    4. Thia Halmades

      Thia Halmades

      I am very tired and should be in bed, but I’m watching the aftermath of the VP debate. I’m reasonably certain I agree completely with everything you said, but let me respond in more detail after I get some sleep.

×
×
  • Create New...