Hey everyone,
I need a rule clarification on Invisibility vs. Sight and other sensory groups.
There is a player at the table to who has invisibility to sight. He is making the claim that if you use any sight group to detect him, he will be un-detectable. This includes if you are looking at a radar screen, it would make a “Bleep” sound but you would not see the dot on the screen, because you would be using your “sight” to see the representation shown.
He has quoted pg 126 as his reference in which it states something like a battleships radar uses both radar (as the equipment) and normal sight (in order to see the screen). Because a radar screen uses sight (which is common) it would be -½ .
Now, I and two other players are unsure on this. With the exception of page 126, nowhere else in the book does it suggest that you are invisible to all mechanical representations? Not only does this seem ridicules, but it also seems very un-thematic. The problem in this case is that the argument has come up based solely on the rules and not on the spirit. The story teller has already said that he thinks it’s illogical however; this has become an argument of rules.
Does this mean that if someone is looking at a radar screen when a flash grenade goes off, the guy looking at the screen gets blinded even though he is not anywhere in the area? After all his “sight” group would be technically joint affected by radar according to page 126. Or is he reading this wrong?
I can’t imagine this being the case nor can the two other players. It seems completely silly and in many ways, it makes the sight group of sensory WAY to powerful. Is this a Rule 0 (the story teller makes the call) moment or is there rules that you can point me to that suggest that this player is misinformed?
Thanks.
Mainman112