Gary Posted March 31, 2004 Report Share Posted March 31, 2004 Re: Is this technique now considered legal? In this instance' date=' it clearly isn't what the player intended. If it were a "power up energy armor" type of construct, I could see that, but the way it was presented, it clearly wasn't intended to represent a power set that turns off when the PC is stunned.[/quote'] Yeah, it's pretty clear that the player was intending to have a limitation that didn't really limit him. That being said, strictly by the rules, the player is hosed if he takes that limitation and gets Stunned. And if I were a GM, I'd point this out to the player. If he chooses to take the limitation anyway, I wouldn't have the slightest bit of sympathy when he experiences the drawbacks associated with that limitation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.