I'm looking at expanding the variety of uses of Charges and was looking at your Heroglyphs #16 article, specifically Conserved Charges. I like it as it provides an option sort of like Activation for Charges.
But it doesn't quite make sense as is -- are the values in the table backwards? Or should the text say "conserved" instead of "consumed"?
"if he rolls less than or equal to that number, a Charge is consumed"
Roll Reduction in Value
14- 3/4 less Limitation
11- 1/2 less Limitation
8- 1/4 less Limitation
It seems like the baseline should be 18- for -0 since the charge would always be consumed (as it is for regular charges) and the lower the value of the roll the less the Limitation if consumed is meant (14- is ~90% consumed so it's closer to -0, and 8- ~25% consumed so it's farther from -0).
So, is the table correct or the text?
P.S. great work on all the 6th ed. stuff shown so far! I hope a lot more cool options like you did in Heroglyphs make it into the game or the Advanced book.
Question
Hierax
I'm looking at expanding the variety of uses of Charges and was looking at your Heroglyphs #16 article, specifically Conserved Charges. I like it as it provides an option sort of like Activation for Charges.
But it doesn't quite make sense as is -- are the values in the table backwards? Or should the text say "conserved" instead of "consumed"?
So, is the table correct or the text?
P.S. great work on all the 6th ed. stuff shown so far! I hope a lot more cool options like you did in Heroglyphs make it into the game or the Advanced book.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts