I tried to search and see if this has been asked before but I didn't see that it had. In 6E2 pg. 102, there is an example in the first column that I can't quite get a grasp of. It is the example regarding the character, Smashtacular, with his Advantaged Strength. Now according to the example, when he performed his Haymaker, his damage increased from 8d6 to 10 1/2d6. That is an increase of 2 and half DCs. However, since Double Knockback is a +1/2 Advantage and the Haymaker adds only 4DCs, shouldn't his final damage be only 10d6. The bonus for the Haymaker is enough to add 2d6 but not quite enough to add 3d6, which would require +5 DCs (instead of the Haymaker's +4DCs) for a +1/2 Advantage. I see the table reads 10 1/2d6 but according to the rules, there are no half DCs. Is Strength an exception to this rule? Is the table wrong? Is this just a bit of rounding on the table to make things simpler? Or am I just missing something altogether? Thank you.
Question
Zephrosyne
I tried to search and see if this has been asked before but I didn't see that it had. In 6E2 pg. 102, there is an example in the first column that I can't quite get a grasp of. It is the example regarding the character, Smashtacular, with his Advantaged Strength. Now according to the example, when he performed his Haymaker, his damage increased from 8d6 to 10 1/2d6. That is an increase of 2 and half DCs. However, since Double Knockback is a +1/2 Advantage and the Haymaker adds only 4DCs, shouldn't his final damage be only 10d6. The bonus for the Haymaker is enough to add 2d6 but not quite enough to add 3d6, which would require +5 DCs (instead of the Haymaker's +4DCs) for a +1/2 Advantage. I see the table reads 10 1/2d6 but according to the rules, there are no half DCs. Is Strength an exception to this rule? Is the table wrong? Is this just a bit of rounding on the table to make things simpler? Or am I just missing something altogether? Thank you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts