In your response to followup I, you indicate the character can decide not to use his FW, even after a successful roll. Presumably, he simply doesn't target the weakness.
You then indicate he would then be required to re-roll in order to use the FW again.
Assume he had previously made a FW roll, then missed a second roll to halve defenses again. It would seem appropriate that, if the character refrains from using FW on his next attack, then rolls again to FW again (target back to half defense), he culd not follow this up with another roll to halve the defenses again, down to a quarter.
In other words, refraining from exploiting the weakness would not set the character up to make more rolls, potentially reducing the target's defenses below the point where he previously failed a roll.
[Hopefully the above makes sense. If not, tell me and I'll try to rephrase.]
Question
Hugh Neilson
In your response to followup I, you indicate the character can decide not to use his FW, even after a successful roll. Presumably, he simply doesn't target the weakness.
You then indicate he would then be required to re-roll in order to use the FW again.
Assume he had previously made a FW roll, then missed a second roll to halve defenses again. It would seem appropriate that, if the character refrains from using FW on his next attack, then rolls again to FW again (target back to half defense), he culd not follow this up with another roll to halve the defenses again, down to a quarter.
In other words, refraining from exploiting the weakness would not set the character up to make more rolls, potentially reducing the target's defenses below the point where he previously failed a roll.
[Hopefully the above makes sense. If not, tell me and I'll try to rephrase.]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts